50 Aircraft?

[B19 Flyer]

like the BBJ?

Proven wrong again!

BBJ is a nice airplane but carries less than 300 passengers. So yes, it's small and can 't do what the fleet that I'm involved with can. You seem to forget that a great percentage of my career was with a legacy carrier, and the equivelent of a 737 would have been entry level.

 

[fischman]

No you are wrong. You misquoted me. You accused me of stating, "You might find B19 telling folks to "shut up and get back to work."

That isn't what that post stated. That posted stated directly, "Do your job and shut up." No reference that about getting back to work, and that is a major difference.

The post is about all the whining that you and other union members do on this board. You're such a bunch of whiners.

If you are going to post my opinions for me, at least get them right!

That is semantics, and the intent of your point is the same.

 

[fischman]

BBJ is a nice airplane but carries less than 300 passengers. So yes, it's small and can 't do what the fleet that I'm involved with can. You seem to forget that a great percentage of my career was with a legacy carrier, and the equivelent of a 737 would have been entry level.

Remind me how many the Piaggio seats again?

 

[fischman]

BBJ is a nice airplane but carries less than 300 passengers. So yes, it's small and can 't do what the fleet that I'm involved with can. You seem to forget that a great percentage of my career was with a legacy carrier, and the equivelent of a 737 would have been entry level.

The BBJ and 737, although have the same type rating, are different airplanes.

The BBJ is a global aircraft, where the 737 is a continental plane.

 

[B19 Flyer]

The BBJ and 737, although have the same type rating, are different airplanes.

The BBJ is a global aircraft, where the 737 is a continental plane.

Understood. But still small by what I am currently involved with. I didn't make this choice, it just happened, but the BBJ is small in comparison, though big by NJ standards.

 

[B19 Flyer]

That is semantics, and the intent of your point is the same.

No it's not. Your statement puts words into it that I didn't state and implies that they are not working.

My statement implies that you have a job to do, just do it and stop whining. Be fortunate you have a job.

Apples and oranges, your perception is why you need a union or your mother to speak for you.

 

[fischman]

But still small by what I am currently involved with.

Remind me how many the Piaggio seats again?

.....

 

[fischman]

No it's not. Your statement puts words into it that I didn't state and implies that they are not working.

My statement implies that you have a job to do, just do it and stop whining. Be fortunate you have a job.

Apples and oranges, your perception is why you need a union or your mother to speak for you.

Whatever dude. I'm not going to argue semantics. I see it as the same thing.

 

[lowspeed]

Remind me how many the Piaggio seats again?

what do you mean by that.

 

[skiandsurf]

You guys are embarassing.

End of discussion.

 

[fischman]

what do you mean by that.

I'm just asking a question. That's all.

 

[corpflunkie]

Remind me how many the Piaggio seats again?

Why did you have to go and bring my company into the fruckus?

 

[gomach2]

yawn!!

 

[fischman]

Why did you have to go and bring my company into the fruckus?

That depends on who you work for.

 

[gunfyter]

Why did you have to go and bring my company into the fruckus?

There are those who believe 19 is management there. I am going with 19 has his own aviation consulting company.