Outsider looking in here:
IF the solution to all of this integration mess was better fencing, why on earth did you (US) go to arbitration.
I keep reading posts by (US) folks about what should have been done and what could nave been done to more evenly and equitably arrive at merged list. My question is, why weren't these things actually negotiated?
In the end, this is clearly a failure to negotiate. That failure does not rest with the Arbitrator, nor with ALPA. It rests with those chosen to negotiate, and by default, those who sent them.
Thank You for putting it in a nutshell. However what is common sense to most everyone is in fact illogical to the MEC reps in the east. This can't be their fault, it's everyone else's (ALPA, Nic's, West Mec) fault because they didn't give us what we wanted. Their membership should be pissed that their leaders who were entrusted with the responsibility to look out for them didn't take a hard look at merger policy and say "gee where are we at risk here and lets find a way to minimize it" (fences) but instead we had pompous proclaimations no negotiations whatsoever. Even after the Arbitrator told them that their plan would not work!!!
And now after misrepresenting their guys for so long, impractical promises and failing. They have frustrated the rank and file so badly that they are virtually handing them to the yahoos at USAPA who are also misreprsenting the likelyhood of switching unions to beat the award.
I suppose they believe that if they drag the West into USAPA that they will just as blindly submit to what ever they decree as the east guys have done.