20 ABX DC9 Captains Surplussed

[EatinRamen]

Im sorry to hear that your airplanes are being taken away. I'm one pilot not at all happy about gaining aircraft at the expense of another pilot group.

 

[727Niteflyer]

under the contract dont pilots have to go with the airplanes ?

On another thread it was explained that the pilots have to go with the airplanes.

 

[abxdx]

Not if the airline they fly for does not exist anymore.

under the contract dont pilots have to go with the airplanes ?

On another thread it was explained that the pilots have to go with the airplanes.

 

[DC-9er]

N714AX is the ACFT. I believed it was dry-leased to you folks. Probably the first of many, not all to PACE, I am sure they will spread them around. Curious, do you guys have 767's on your certificate?

Pretty sure 714AX has never flown revenue service for ABX. So that was the one aircraft that might not fall under scope.

 

[ABXbooger]

I think this was the China plane that our management used to again show how brilliant they are...

JH to his cronies: " hey, y'all let's go over and screw them Chinese into selling us a cheap airplane...yuck, yuck...they won't know what hit 'em..."

 

[erichartmann]

Well Eric he who knows all,

Never made that claim. Just think your opinion as expressed here is wrong, and gave mine. Opinions are like the redeye, everybody has one.

once DHL parks all the aircraft ATSG/ABX will file BK.

Perhaps. I think the whole place goes under if that happens and I don't think Joe wants that. He's already made a ton of money off this deal, more than enough to live very comfortably for the rest of his life. So it's not about money.

I personally do not see Joe running a training department while all the aircraft are parked and no revenue is coming in. Bottom line is no retraining! I say DHL pulls the plug Jan 1 or sooner!

First, though, DHL will park the -9's. If they haven't yet parked the 767's there will be money for retraining. Big "IF" I admit. Since the ACMI runs into 2010 there may well be money for some money for retraining even if they pull the plug in Jan '09 as part of a cancellation. I think it possible there will be people who go home and collect paychecks until their number comes up for furlough. In fact, I think that the most likely senario if DHL pulls the plug on or before Jan 1. All the -9's and the PC 767's get parked, the relatively junior 767 CA's who are needed for the right seat will go to training, everybody else not needed to fly the SF's go home, and as soon as the first former 767 CA comes out of training for the right seat everybody at home is furloughed along with the 767 F/O's who are still flying.

Please do not quote me the CBA if you read my post I said "THE UNION" I did not say I did not think ABX could open KIX dom.

The implication was there.

And per the ACMI DHL is responsible for funding our retirement while we have a contract with them.

I never said they weren't on the hook for retirement. That, after all, is part of the "C" in ACMI.

 

[erichartmann]

Can't argue yea or nay to any of your other points, but I seriously doubt that we're losing money, and I seriously doubt that Cappy is losing either. No clue about CAM, but I can hazard a guess. Although our fearless leaders year in and year out have felt the need to cry that we can't survive under our then and now current cost structure, we've made millions year in and year out when the final results became public. If we are losing money now, it's because it's being squirreled away from us using some good old fashioned recipes in the ATSG kitchen. Someone along the chain is lining their pockets, and it ain't us...

Thats based on the consolidated annual report financials. I suspect what's happening is they are showing you and Cappy as losing money within ATSG so as not to have to pay taxes and as part of the contract negotiating strategy.

 

[727Niteflyer]

ATSG will remain alive and prosperous using ATI and Cappy. I suspect that the same fate awaits ABX as did ATA. The holding company shifted all debt from North American and World to ATA and Sank it. I have a feeling thats whats gonna happen here.

 

[b707guy]

Thats based on the consolidated annual report financials.

Can you provide a link to this report, or post an excerpt? I'm a shareholder and haven't seen anything myself. Cappy's always made money, mid to high single digits as I recall (along the lines of industry typical margins, anyway), and we've posted incredible profits, well into double digits and well above industry typical numbers. The only thing that's changed in the past year is who's cooking the books.

 

[erichartmann]

Can you provide a link to this report, or post an excerpt? I'm a shareholder and haven't seen anything myself. Cappy's always made money, mid to high single digits as I recall (along the lines of industry typical margins, anyway), and we've posted incredible profits, well into double digits and well above industry typical numbers. The only thing that's changed in the past year is who's cooking the books.

Try looking under free edgar or the SEC. I took someone else's word for it, which I freely admit may have been a mistake.

 

[erichartmann]

ATSG will remain alive and prosperous using ATI and Cappy. I suspect that the same fate awaits ABX as did ATA. The holding company shifted all debt from North American and World to ATA and Sank it. I have a feeling thats whats gonna happen here.

It is my understanding that the debt is held under the parent ATSG. Much of it comes from the purchase of CHI. I'm not sure it would be particularly easy to transfer that to ABX at this point, but this is not my field.

 

[erichartmann]

Off the subject a little here... We at Pace Airlines just accepted delivery of a leased ABX 767-200. Of course our management doesn't say why or what it's for. Can anyone at ABX shed any light on this? Is ABX leasing a/c or is Pace "stealing" someone's flying. I'm just trying to get an idea.

Do you know what the "N" number is?

If its a cargo aircraft it would most likely be N714AX, which as someone else pointed out was never in revenue service for ABX. Our management has used this to justify a transfer of this aircraft to CAM and dry lease it elsewhere. This is widely regarded as pressure on the union for contract negotiation purposes. Since it hasn't worked I have no doubt they will follow through and this may be the proof. Now the union will have to decide if this represents a violation of our scope language. Who you wind up flying cargo for may make a difference.

If its a pax aircraft it may be the ex Air China aircraft equipped with the odd-ball P&W engines that ABX decided was not worth converting to cargo config for our use.

The scope language pertaining to pilots "following" the aircraft involves a "Substatial Assest Sale" which in turn is defined as the disposition or and/or transfer directly or indirectly more than 25% of the company's aircraft in a single or multiple transactions over a rolling 30 month period.

 

[b707guy]

I would suspect that any debt incurred by the purchase of CHI would come from CAM, who owns and is trying to pay for a bunch of 767s, a 757 or so, and conversions to boot. Before CAM snapped up all of our aircraft, we owned about half of them, and lease rates on the rest, even on the -73s, were pennies on the dollar compared with 767 lease rates. Heavy checks and 100k hour checks were (and still are...) the only really pricey aspect of living with DC-8s.

Every time we (ATI) have been bought over the years, the ensuing financial report showed an incredible revenue spike on the part of the purchaser. This includes both our individual sale to CHI, and CHI to what was ABX at the time. ATI's and Cappy's contribution to ATSGs overall revenue stream is accompanied by very little debt that can attributed to us directly. Here's a wild assertion of which I have no evidence to back up as I've never been aboard an ABX aircraft, so maybe you can help deny or at least verify the possibility of this: My guess is that the aircraft operated by ABX Air have not been transferred to CAM, so that ABX Air can be shown as a losing entity (and therefore a scapegoat) on the books due to 767 purchases and conversions that are still being paid for. CAM by itself may be losing money, but can be shown as contributing to a positive revenue stream down the road. All just a guess on my part...

 

[nitefr8dog]

Never made that claim. Just think your opinion as expressed here is wrong, and gave mine. Opinions are like the redeye, everybody has one.



Perhaps. I think the whole place goes under if that happens and I don't think Joe wants that. He's already made a ton of money off this deal, more than enough to live very comfortably for the rest of his life. So it's not about money.



First, though, DHL will park the -9's. If they haven't yet parked the 767's there will be money for retraining. Big "IF" I admit. Since the ACMI runs into 2010 there may well be money for some money for retraining even if they pull the plug in Jan '09 as part of a cancellation. I think it possible there will be people who go home and collect paychecks until their number comes up for furlough. In fact, I think that the most likely senario if DHL pulls the plug on or before Jan 1. All the -9's and the PC 767's get parked, the relatively junior 767 CA's who are needed for the right seat will go to training, everybody else not needed to fly the SF's go home, and as soon as the first former 767 CA comes out of training for the right seat everybody at home is furloughed along with the 767 F/O's who are still flying.



The implication was there.



I never said they weren't on the hook for retirement. That, after all, is part of the "C" in ACMI.

Well Eric, Joe may not want the whole place to go away but 500M in dept and no revenue means the banks do not care what Joe wants. As far as parking the 9s and retraining, when the 9s are all parked the 767s will be shortly after hence the doors will be bolted shut! As far as KIX you may be a mind reader but you are not very good at it. I was very vocal about the company being able to open KIX. No mater how much the union stomped thier feet and rolled around on the floor a judge now days needs to see some damages. Just saying we do not like will not and did not get it stopped. JMHO.

 

[erichartmann]

...I was very vocal about the company being able to open KIX. No mater how much the union stomped thier feet and rolled around on the floor a judge now days needs to see some damages. Just saying we do not like will not and did not get it stopped. JMHO.

I was not particularly vocal about it, but felt from the beginning that the union had zero chance of prevailing on KIX. One had only to read the CBA language to understand how that would go.