Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

135 Duty day

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sammy
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 15

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I worked for a 135 operator for a situation almost like what pilotyip described. Of course one had the responsibility to be on call and answer the phone, but the company said, and the POI allowed, that if the pager bill was in your name, then they just happened to get ahold of you.

Never mind that the company supplied the pager, and you could not turn down the flight either. There are POIs who think try to interpret regs for themselves, like in that situation, rather than follow them as they are written.

Hopefully with new regs written, that do not have vague language, they will be less room for people to play around with the regs like that and undercut operators who do it right.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom