johnsonrod
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
- Posts
- 4,218
The C-series is so far into mainline on every scope clause that it can't start at the small carriers and nibble away at scope clauses like Embrauer is trying to do with the E series. This means it has to go head to head with both Boeing and Airbus, and to win orders it needs to be demonstrably better. From what I've read, they've done it, but at great cost in $$ and delays. With 737 NG and A319 as competition, they look great. But the longer the delays, the closer we get to NEOs and MAXs, which will level the playing field.
I fear that Bombardier has misplayed this, and will have to rely on start-ups or other carriers not heavily vested in Boeing/Airbus. The product looks compelling, but can Bombardier afford to keep funding it until it is self-sufficient?
Have you seen this chart below? A319 NEO and 737-700 can't compare with the CS300 in terms of efficiency:
http://airinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/casm-chart.jpg
UAL is already very familiar with Bombardier through the CRJ series and Q400. The C-Series can also fly more than 2,000 miles full and it can operate on short runways like Aspen or London City - it offers amazing flexibility that the A319 NEO can't offer and a FBW system not available on the future 737-700 MAX.
With 40 airframe slots (and some options) from Republic, any of the legacies could add the CS300 relatively quickly once testing is finally done. Again, time will tell...
Last edited: