Alfred Kahn is the guy you need to read (more?) about. He wrote deregulation and once said "Pan Am can go to hell". Of course he loved SWA... However, and here's an interesting point about Midway (the airport and the airline you mention), initially small airlines asked for 2 years of protection around Midway airport. Kahn and his team carefully considered it, but ultimately declined. Competition, and the unfettered outcome, was what they [Kahn's team] were after and NOT picking winners. That is NOT what happened in Dallas. SWA received enormous protection from bare knuckled competition at Love Field. Opposite of what was intended. It's a way bigger deal than the sum total of legacy airline BKs. They were handed their success.
You know, Floppy, I've asked you twenty times to actually explain this, and twenty times you've p*ssied out on me. I wonder why that is.
You
have repeated lies, which I've refuted, but you've never actually shown any "protection" shown SWA at Dallas Love, and by whom. Why?--there was no "protection." Only attacks.
One more time for you, Flop, the slow-witted amongst us: only AFTER winning every legal challenge thrown against us by the other airlines, including multiple trips up to and including the US Supreme Court; and only AFTER surviving actual illegal threats and tactics that resulted in convictions in
criminal court of three other airlines, including Flop's beloved Continental airlines; Southwest finally started flying in 1971 as an intrastate Texas airline.
After deregulation in 1978, Southwest planned expansion and started flying to other states. Again, more frivolous and BS legal attacks, which were all dismissed by various courts, again including the US Supreme Court. What happened then? Why, DFW and American Airlines got their paid-for political stooge, House Speaker Jim Wright (D., Ft Worth) to change the law, by sneaking in what became the Wright Amendment into unrelated legislation. This had the effect of hobbling SWA in Dallas Love, and prohibited us from expanding service any further in the future. Hmmm, a prohibition on what we
wanted to do doesn't sound much like "protection"; it sounds like interference.
Up until the compromise that finally ended the WA in 2014, other airlines came and went from Dallas Love as they pleased, although they were subject to the same restrictions that Southwest was. And, up until 2014, there were literally
dozens of unused gates at Dallas Love that no other airline wanted. So don't give us the old "Southwest had other airlines banned from Love Field" BS.
So tell me please, Flop, what exact "protection" did Southwest receive? And from whom did Southwest receive it? Are you going to actually answer this time, or will you p*ssy out again?
Bubba