scoreboardII
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Posts
- 2,694
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a lot of evidence out there that is not presented in the mainstream media.
For example, did you know that there was a massive spike in put options on UAL and AMR stock in the weeks before 9/11? Not on CAL or DAL or LUV, just UAL and AMR and it has never been investigated. Congress can easily find out who bought the options and could have called them in and asked what they knew, but they avoided the whole subject. Why would that be?
Sort of surprised that nobody has mentioned NPR. Not really interested in the news shows that provide "viewpoints" or debate. Just give me facts and I'll figure out an opinion on my own.
Ratings and spin are unrelated. Some may interpret that high ratings come from a network telling people what they want to hear.
Old white men yelling at a TV in agreement does not equal truth in reporting.
People often mistake popularity for truth, FOX et al are "infotainment". Case in point, the Snowden affair, if you look at one single info point, the Verizon data monitoring debacle. That one issue is beyond all the other data exposures. Research TOR, lots of interesting stuff that Google et al don't include in their search databases.Very true. Bill O'Reilly's ratings are through the roof, even though zero factual information is actually presented during the broadcast.
There is a lot of evidence out there that is not presented in the mainstream media.
For example, did you know that there was a massive spike in put options on UAL and AMR stock in the weeks before 9/11? Not on CAL or DAL or LUV, just UAL and AMR and it has never been investigated. Congress can easily find out who bought the options and could have called them in and asked what they knew, but they avoided the whole subject. Why would that be?
Very true. Bill O'Reilly's ratings are through the roof, even though zero factual information is actually presented during the broadcast.
The sponsors are not swayed by the truth. Bottom line...pure and simple. FN knows this and does a brilliant job keeping viewership high, accurate reporting is not important.
FOX NEWS ALERT! (...and then some "scandal" involving some "liberal"...or a "war on Christmas")
...do you believe for one minute a big company is going to stake it's reputation on a show that is not being upfront or truthful??
This IMHO is the difference between liberals and conservatives; a liberal is okay with your opinion, so long as that liberal agrees with it! The second you voice an opinion opposite that of the liberal, the liberal wants to silence you and shut you down!! How many conservatives do you see calling for MSNBC, CNN, the NY Times or any other media outlet to be shut down or silenced? Never,
A couple of cowboy Southwest types could, especially if they took the runway already doing 80 knots.