shagadelic
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 16, 2002
- Posts
- 309
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe the bitching will stop?................nah.
Hopefully this will ease a small amount of the pain that both sides are experiencing.
Not if they don't give first priority to the AirTran pilots who were based there. If they have a situation were an AirTran pilot got displaced out and gets replaced by a SWA guy there you will be creating a nightmare.
Not if they don't give first priority to the AirTran pilots who were based there. If they have a situation were an AirTran pilot got displaced out and gets replaced by a SWA guy there you will be creating a nightmare.
Grind that axe, Dan
AT pilots will not be getting displaced out of their AT domicile. When they transition to SWA they will get placed in a SWA domicile. There currently is not a SWA domicile in ATL. Therefore, they will bid and be awarded a domicile based on their seniority and vacancies. When ATL is opened up, every SWA pilot will be required to add ATL to their vacancy list. Once Jul '13 rolls around, they will announce who is awarded or displaced to ATL. Any new AT pilot coming over to the SWA side will bid accordingly. Again, they will be awarded what they can hold. So, there will not be any nightmare scenario like you are stating. This might actually be a good thing for AT/SWA alike.
But, thanks for your concern Mr. Roman!!!
Not in the least, before some SWA guys jumps in here and say I hate SWA, let me point out the reason I am so active on these merger strings. I work for Hawaiian so I think it's obvious why "smaller" airlines merging into larger airlines is of particular interest to me. Although the only realistic option out there is DAL and Lee Moak was in HNL and went on record dispelling that (I know I know, that and $2 will get you a cup of coffee). Nevertheless, it's a subject of great interest to me. Not so much at my seniority as much as concern for the whole seniority list.
So......back to the original thought on here. If an airline tried to buy HAL, displace pilots out of HNL and than replace those pilots there would be a firestorm. Fortunately there are enough protections to prevent that scenario, both geographically and politically that it is not a realistic concern, but it still is something I hate seeing happen to anyone else.
In other words the AirTran pilots brought ALL the ATL flying to the table but now it's being divided among the whole list?
As long as you're not bought by Southwest, you should be good with that. And the word is "precedent", by the way.There is a lot of president for this in prior mergers and acquisitions..
Oh boy, here we go... *sigh*
As long as you're not bought by Southwest, you should be good with that. And the word is "precedent", by the way.(Sorry, couldn't resist)
.
I know, just messing with you, I don't usually play "spelling or grammar police".fixed it! Spelling never my strength... you should see how bad I'd be were it not for spellcheck.
Oh I know, but I'm not going to get into another debate of who wishes they had stayed stand-alone and why, we've beat that to death the last 48 hours.I have some good friends at AT, don't get me wrong, Im all about doing the best for your pilot group, but a lot worse could have happened to AT than joining southwest. I remember back in the day in Concorse C when i was a smoker, I'd spend quite a bit of time in the "smoke room" talking to Value Jet/Airtran guys ... I remember the TWA rumors, I remember the ASA rumors! I also remember the time when we called it a lateral move to go from ASA to Airtran... the company had come a long way, but it was naive to think it was going to remain an independent airline for very long.. The airline industry is a natural oligopoly... it's just like it was pre-deregulation, only now it's deregulated.. STILL costs a fortune to run one and turn a profit!
I know, just messing with you, I don't usually play "spelling or grammar police".![]()
At least some of our CA's should be a little happier not having to commute when they cross.![]()
Funny he wanted to be put on the bottom of the list before now his seniority is much better. Better to be lucky then good sometimes.a would be classmate of mine who is a CA at AT told me there was a captain there at AT who actually had a class date for southwest... almost took it too, luck for him they cancelled it before they announced the merger and saved him from a lifetime of misery.
It will be interesting to see what the DR outcome is for displacement rights for 717 pilots.
AirTran displacement rights are clearly spelled out in your CBA. The DR won't tell you how to administer your own contract. 717 displacements occur on the AirTran side and have no bearing as to any rights or perceived rights on the Southwest side of the fence. AirTran pilots are not considered displaced when they bid over to SWA.
Sorry Bud.
This is a plus for both sides IMHO......It'll get the transitioned AT ATL guys back home to ATL, and slow the defacto displacement of SW FOs in the east coast domiciles, particularly MCO......
LOL - I heard THAT!I think us two ex-mods, on Michaels $hit list can at least go that dirty once in a while!![]()
About 70% of our ATL pilot group commutes, which means about 30% live there of about 1,000 or so pilots, that's 300 peeps. If the majority of them get back in, that should flesh the base out pretty well, even when it grows later on. Good news for them, once the dust settles and people get (mostly) where they want to be.I agree. ANY east coast base will help. I'm not sure how much it will help MCO, but any relief for those wanting ATL/East Coast is welcomed in my book.
I hope the former AT guys that want it can hold it. It would be great for them to drive to work. Unfortunately they don't all live there, but definitely good news.