Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republic 4th,Quarter and Calendar Year 2011.Frontier Airlines reports 11.0% increase

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

inflightboi175

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Posts
151
INDIANAPOLIS -- Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: RJET) reported operating revenues of $697.8 million for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2011, an increase of 7.4%, compared to $649.8 million for the same period last year. The increase in revenues is primarily due to an 11.0% increase in Frontier Airlines’ unit revenues.
During the quarter, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $191.1 million to reduce the carrying value of certain assets, mainly its 42 owned 37-50 seat aircraft. The Company also recorded non-cash charges of approximately $24.1 million related to the expected return of four leased A319 aircraft in 2012 and approximately $9.0 million related to the renegotiation of its E190 purchase order and the expected return of certain leased Embraer aircraft in 2012.
Therefore, on a GAAP basis, the Company reported a net loss of $123.5 million, or $2.55 per diluted share, for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2011, compared to a net loss of $1.3 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, for the same period last year. On an ex-item basis, the Company is reporting net income of $17.0 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, compared to an ex-item net income of $7.4 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, for the three month periods ended Dec. 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
“We are very pleased with our fourth quarter results, especially in light of significant fuel price headwinds on our branded operations,” said Bryan Bedford, Chairman and CEO of Republic Airways Holdings. “Our restructuring efforts during 2011, coupled with strong unit revenue growth at Frontier, enabled us to produce significantly improved ex-item results this quarter, in spite of more than $35 million of increased fuel costs.”
The following tables present the reconciliation of results on a GAAP basis to the reported ex-item results for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2011 and 2010:
http://www.sunherald.com/2012/02/29/3786864/republic-airways-holdings-announces.html
 
$191,100,000.00 write down or impairment charge on Chatauqua planes? I think those are being set up to go away. Maybe Chatauqua is going away altogether.
 
$191,100,000.00 write down or impairment charge on Chatauqua planes? I think those are being set up to go away. Maybe Chatauqua is going away altogether.

I may not be the smartest at reading these financial reports but it has always been my belief that CHQ would fade off into the sunset. This is one of the large reasons I left and decided I wanted to interview at Frontier.

I still remember the night vividly. I was finishing up IOE and check airman at CHQ mentioned that he thought CHQ would eventually be gone. I didn't get it then, but I get it now. He was a good Captain, Airman, and guy to boot.

That story always reminds me that there ARE some great people over at the triad of evil, despite some differences of opinions.

I wish all of us luck in the future!
 
It was interesting reading the financials that the only part of RJET that did well is the part they want to divest.
 
And as an additional benefit, make the FFD side look bad to the mediator.

win/win
 
70.4 million loss for the year doesn't make them look like they did well.

Of course this would be the line of thinking if you were uninformed or unwitting of the reasons behind the numbers. The Airbus is profitable and in particular, it is profitable in Denver. The regional aircraft (RAH) that were flying under the Frontier brand were largely responsible for the losses reflected in the year-end report. Going forward, only the Airbus flying will be accounted for in the Frontier numbers. This is good for Frontier but not so much for the regional airlines feeding them. Some joker got a LOL regarding whether there was going to be a "buyer" for Frontier. I don't think they are looking for a buyer, rather an investor who will be able to take a profitable stand-alone airline to the next level. As always, the ridiculous fuel prices may foil a lot of plans in this industry for everyone.
 
Of course this would be the line of thinking if you were uninformed or unwitting of the reasons behind the numbers. The Airbus is profitable and in particular, it is profitable in Denver. The regional aircraft (RAH) that were flying under the Frontier brand were largely responsible for the losses reflected in the year-end report. Going forward, only the Airbus flying will be accounted for in the Frontier numbers. This is good for Frontier but not so much for the regional airlines feeding them. Some joker got a LOL regarding whether there was going to be a "buyer" for Frontier. I don't think they are looking for a buyer, rather an investor who will be able to take a profitable stand-alone airline to the next level. As always, the ridiculous fuel prices may foil a lot of plans in this industry for everyone.

Or possibly down a few levels. Chapter 11 to Chapter 7.
 
The numbers speak volumes and they are not easily fudged. Aside from fuel costs, they are all positive and, when considering fuel costs for Q4, they are most likely the best numbers EVER reported by Frontier for a Q4.

Branded revenue up 8.9%

- good

Capacity down 1.9%

- neutral to not good except for:

Load Factor up 5.6%

- good

Total Revenue per ASM (TRASM) up 11.0%

- very good

Pre-tax income (profit) $7.8M (compared to $11.2M loss same quarter last year)

- Good

Branded CASM 7.93¢ (6.80¢ when "integration & fleet transition" expenses of $40.1M are excluded)

- 6.80¢ pretty good, What was the $40.1M for? My guess is it is a reflection of "fleet transition" away from ERJs and E170s.

Fuel costs 27.3% higher than same quarter last year ($35m?)

- Bad.

Imagine what the pre-tax income would have looked like without an extra $35M spent on fuel and "integration & fleet transition" expenses of $40.1M.
 
Now for the other side of the equation:

RAH Fixed-Fee revenues up $2.8%

- Good

RAH Fixed-Fee pre-tax income flat at roughly $22M

- Neutral

RAH Fixed-Fee CASM increased 6.5% to 8.29¢

- Bad

Embraer flying for Frontier branded operation is now done on a "pro-rate' contract and P&L will no longer be included in Frontier financials.

- Good, ERJ/EMB losses (or profits) will not be buried in Frontier financials.

RJETs total cash balance decreased $59.6M

- Bad

RJETs restricted cash increased $12.3M

- Good, although "restricted" is the key word with that $12.3M

RJETs unrestricted cash decreased $71.9M

- Bad

RJET reports 25 aircraft in its "Other" segment

- Bad, because they don't have anywhere to fly them with FFD. They are subleased or flying charters.

RJET incurred $191M charge to reduce carrying costs of "certain assets"

- Bad

11 ERJs were parked during Q4, at a cost of $2.7M

- Bad

11 ERJs are subleased offshore

- Bad, because this reflects fact that they are "extra" aircraft with current place in the FFD business

One E170 and 2 Q400s also parked

- Bad

RJET is attempting to rid themselves of aircraft that are excess to its projected operating needs

- Bad, for growth and I guess good for the bottom line financial performance of FFD side.
 
In this economy, why would someone sell something that is "making money"? I would think they would want to hold on to that?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom