Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

So ASA(SKW) buys an airline...

  • Thread starter Thread starter OCP
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 13

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

OCP

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Posts
976
And that airline grows, while the buyer shrinks? Not just keeping the airplanes that they have, but pulling more (37 seat?) out of the desert. And that makes money?
But ASA sucks so bad that we lost 14 AC this year. 6 200s(50 seat) and 8 700s.
 
Last edited:
And that airline grows, while the buyer shrinks? Not just keeping the airplanes that they have, but pulling more (37 seat?) out of the desert. And that makes money?
But ASA sucks so bad that we lost 14 AC this year. 6 200s(50 seat) and 8 700s.

The buyer isn't shrinking. They are adding flying for US Airways.
 
Aren't we all ASA (now Expressjet)? Why no expansion of the CRJ?
Me thinks that they are trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the XJT people by playing nice...

Oil is well over $100 a barrel now. 50 seaters and high oil don't really mix, thus little expansion.


Godspeed!


The OYSter
 
Aren't we all ASA (now Expressjet)? Why no expansion of the CRJ?
Me thinks that they are trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the XJT people by playing nice...

Maybe it's because the XJT side is more cost competitive?

Who? Skywest Inc.? or (former) ASA?

The buyer. That is what you said in your original post.

Oil is well over $100 a barrel now. 50 seaters and high oil don't really mix, thus little expansion.
Unfortunately they will last a little longer because they pay their people less money.

So what's your excuse for the addition of five 37 seaters to people who are paid more money?
 
Last edited:
The Continental CPA's are just more lucrative than the Delta ones. Hard to grow when management agrees to CPA's that decrease in revenue over time while their costs go up.
 
Maybe it's because the XJT side is more cost competitive?



The buyer. That is what you said in your original post.




So what's your excuse for the addition of five 37 seaters to people who are paid more money?

I have no idea why they would try that. Probably not very smart. 37 seaters are even more uneconomical with high oil prices. AA Eagle will be dumping most of them shortly according to articles I have read. Maybe they will use them on a corporate shuttle? Face it, if oil stays this high for good, it doesn't look "good" for any 37 seater, let alone 50 seaters. The economics just aren't there. But, someone can always try to prove that wrong.


Godspeed!


The OYSter
 
And that airline grows, while the buyer shrinks? Not just keeping the airplanes that they have, but pulling more (37 seat?) out of the desert. And that makes money?
But ASA sucks so bad that we lost 14 AC this year. 6 200s(50 seat) and 8 700s.

The buyer hasn't shrunk. ASA did not buy XJT. SKW did (which has been beaten to death already).


Anyway...who knows why one side of the house is growing while the other is not. Soon enough, it all won't matter anyway. Maybe United has a preference of ERJs over CRJ2's.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom