Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Seniority has everything to do with longevity

  • Thread starter Thread starter MCDU
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 18

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
So people flying MD-80/DC-9/A-320/B737 and larger get double seniority anyone flying anything smaller gets half seniority...that way a former RJ guy who just got hired into an MD-80 gets put way ahead of his former colleagues at his former employer, and since we all know that someone who hasn't even finished sim training in an MD-80 is at least 4 or 5 times the pilot he was the week before, and the ex ATA guy who spent 20 years flying 73's or 75's but is now a lowly RJ captain is, as we all know, a terriable pilot by grace of the equipment he flies.


Wrong. Seniority is what your longevity "buys" you at your current airline.
 
wait until they unveil the great health care wealth transferrance when we all have to pay to subsidize the uninsured - classic Democrat welfare
Old man that boat has already left the dock when your republican friends transferred the little wealth possess by OUR MIDDLE CLASS back to the special club, and then spent the rest fighting oil wars all around the globe. What's more twisted about the world than that?

When you have to pay $3500.00 each month to pay for medical insurance for your healthy wife and 16 year old son, then you will understand but your ME, ME, ME mentality who BTW receives SUBSIDES to pay your medical insurance from your employer (funded by...?) can continue to think that you are part of the club.

If "WE" (yes, you and ME) can spend trillions to protect the people (Iraqis) from diseases like Saddam then you can definitely spend a serious dollar amount to help American protect themselves from diseases like corporate profits on sickness. It was a great Republican who once socialistically remarked "government of the people, by the people, for the people..." I think the common theme here is PEOPLE, not corporations.

It's folks like you are that make the world so twisted. Don't blame it on others.

Now back to the thread...
 
You gotta love all the angry/bitter Liberal comments on here. Public education at its finest.

I'm not sure what you mean. I went to public school so I am _________.

Please fill in the blank.
 
Yea, what he said! Let's up the ante even more and say Mesa merged with Southwest. As for Republic though, those guys deserve jack squat. That was always a bottom troll airline, and should be placed underneath just about any other pilot group out there in a merger. I do have condolences towards the US Airways group though, because again mentioning Mesa, I thinks a large quantity of the "dude, I'm just here to get my time, and get on with the majors" went to Mesa and then on to America West. You can blame ALPA, but I think the biggest blame goes first to the what best for me, me, me crowd which unfortunately is spread far and wide among the professional pilot crowd, ALPA or not.


You got that right Embraer driver! The AWA guys were just a small notch above Mesa! You are very inciteful indeed and smart indeed!
Geez, does it surprise anyone why America West pilots want their lottery ticket so bad? Wait until they all go to Republic, then they can get their slotting they so badly feel they deserve! HA HA
 
Anybody who disagrees with this hard fact has a real twisted way of spinning things for their own personal gain. Even the airline bases everything on your longevity.

So everything is based on longevity?

Pilot: "Sir, I'm ready to upgrade"

Chief Pilot: "Yes, I believe you are. However we can not upgrade you because you don't have the required five years of longevity in order to make Captain"

Pilot: "But sir, our airline has only been in existence for three years, and we have yet to fly a single revenue flight since all of us pilots are still F/O's. We don't have any Captains."

Chief Pilot: "I understand. You and the rest of the pilot group only have to wait two more years, then you can all become Captains."

Pilot: "But then who will be our F/O's?"

Chief Pilot: "Oops."

MCDU - longevity is used for what you get within you own airline, relative to the other pilots at that airline. If you are a junior Captain and your airline merges with another, you still remain a junior Captain, no matter how long you or your seniority-list-neighbor from the other airline have been at your jobs. The word there is seniority list, not longevity list. THAT is what longevity is about - and that is not a 'spin for personal gain'.

HAL
 
One final thought, though. I believe that your seniority at Skywest, Cape Air, or Delta is of equivalent value. If Delta bought any one of those carriers, or there was a merger, I believe that your seniority should be weighted based on accepted standards, I don't care if it's a 402 you flew or a 744. A professional airline pilot is a professional airline pilot.

All professional pilots may be equal (I disagree by the way, but for the sake of argument) fine. But the jobs professional pilots occupy are not equal. A pilot flying a 402 has no right to be merged into a position to hop into a 747 seat, I don't care how long he/she has been flying that 402. To do so disregards the hard work of someone who has done all it takes to be in the position of flying a 747.
 
I agree michael, but outsourcing has seriously muddied the waters.
The achievement of getting hired at a regional is not equal to getting hired onto a major- but the entry level major job is now severely delayed bc of rjs- and what's the difference between an rj and a Fokker or dc9?
I can't express what a collossal sellout the outsourcing has been in the 2000s. My generation has every right to fight for the same career opportunities that major pilots seem more than willing to sell.
 
So everything is based on longevity?

MCDU - longevity is used for what you get within you own airline, relative to the other pilots at that airline. If you are a junior Captain and your airline merges with another, you still remain a junior Captain, no matter how long you or your seniority-list-neighbor from the other airline have been at your jobs. The word there is seniority list, not longevity list. THAT is what longevity is about - and that is not a 'spin for personal gain'.

HAL



Exactly. And a perfect example of this is what happened to an old college friend of mine who got hired at USAir in 1987 way before any of the mergers, either the PSA/Piedmont USAir 3 way merge in the late 80's early 90's or the more recent one with AWA.

T never got furloughed since hiring on at USAir in 1987, nor did he ever upgrade to Captain in all his time with his airline, although he could held F28 captain in the early 90's. However ,he chose not to because he didn't like the short haul nature of the flying that the airplane did . His choice, I guess. But I would have played that hand a little differently.


After 2 trips thru BK court, all the furloughs , displacements loss of pension salaries etc. he wound up 60 from the bottom on his own senority list ,a B737 reserve F/O out of CLT.


Now ask yourself 2 questions. Did my friend havelongevity at his own original airline ?Absolutely without a doubt. Did that longevity at his own original airline buy him a senior position at his own airline ? In other words did he have seniority at his own original airline prior to the merger ? Not by a long shot. Even though T got hired at USAIr in 1987 and was never furloughed, the best that longevity date got for him was a very junior positon on his own stand alone seniority list,which is admittedly better than being furloughed outright.

So now the prevailing wisdom on the east side is that T and others like him should leapfrog over guys like my crashpad roomate L who hired on at AWA in 1988 who until recently was a Line holding 757 Capt flying our Hawaii trips until getting displaced to senior A320 Capt with our recent cutbacks, and whose name can be found on the AWA Pilot Seniority list ( a totally different distinct and seperate list than the one my friend T's name can be found on , I mighgt add. )


Until the east pilots of this airline realize that longevity does not a senior pilot make, and that there is nothing you can do to change that fact maybe we can move on to more important issues like contact improvements and pay raises that will benefit all USAIRways pilots ,east and west; regardless of where you are on the combined list .


Be very thankful you got recalled to Hawaiian ...very thankful.

PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Last edited:
The bottom pilot according to the nic,was only in that position for a short time. 1988 hire all were or could have held capt and are now once again in that position or close to it. The snapshot in 2005 was a complete rape of a someones career. No fences and not taking the attrition in to factor made the nic toxic. Ask yourself why one group wants the nic and one will fight to the bitter end. Just like midex pilots who deserve their Doh.

M
 
The bottom pilot according to the nic,was only in that position for a short time. 1988 hire all were or could have held capt and are now once again in that position or close to it. The snapshot in 2005 was a complete rape of a someones career. No fences and not taking the attrition in to factor made the nic toxic. Ask yourself why one group wants the nic and one will fight to the bitter end. Just like midex pilots who deserve their Doh.

M
Hey doosh:
I realize you're a very confused woman these days..........

Marty claiming to have started at US Air in 1997

http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=848465#post848411

Marty claiming to be a UAL pilot.

http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1224345#post1224345

Marty recently claiming not to work for Us Air.

http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1830329#post1830329
 
The bottom pilot according to the nic,was only in that position for a short time. 1988 hire all were or could have held capt and are now once again in that position or close to it. The snapshot in 2005 was a complete rape of a someones career. No fences and not taking the attrition in to factor made the nic toxic. Ask yourself why one group wants the nic and one will fight to the bitter end. Just like midex pilots who deserve their Doh.

M

If that attrition was so important to you guys as it should be then why wasn't that issue addressed before the process moved to mediation and finally arbitration when we had our 2 negotiting committees trying to put something together? Or was it just more advantageous to try and ram a DOH intergration down our throughts hoping no one out west was paying any attention ? Why was it when our case were presented before the arbitrator ,he called us back into his chambers to give us another 10 days to modify our proposals before he ruled and you guys wouldn't back down from your original DOH presentation ?


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Last edited:
Those are all good and valid points. East pilots should have known Nicolaus history and should have worked on fences and protections. Doh was not going to happen with George and he should never have been used while pursuing a DOH list.

M
 
Yes they are. And thanks for recognizing that . Now care to try respond to them ? Regarding DOH, don't you think you would have been better off trying to negotiate something other than a DOH list in the first place ? Seems to me and many others that all you did the short time the process was under the auspicies of the 2 merger comittees was negotiate in bad faith with the end result coming back to bite you in the a$$. Now that you guys have this thing FUBAR ,the big question is where do we (as a combined pilot group for a change;)) go from here ?


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Last edited:
The bottom pilot according to the nic,was only in that position for a short time. 1988 hire all were or could have held capt and are now once again in that position or close to it. The snapshot in 2005 was a complete rape of a someones career. No fences and not taking the attrition in to factor made the nic toxic. Ask yourself why one group wants the nic and one will fight to the bitter end. Just like midex pilots who deserve their Doh.

M


C'mon Marty,not true and you know it. According to 2 friends I have over there ,the 1987 hire I went to college with that I mention in my post, and a 1988 hire who I flew commuters with and had a few beers with in SAN a few months ago, neither one can hold Captain in any aircraft, not even the 190. They aren't any closer to the left seat now than they were pre-merger.

By the way, I gotta ask. Who's the hottie in your avatar ?

PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top