Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Al Franken Wants Computers Out Of The Cockpit

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Sorry for all the fast fire posts here but they're responding to me fast.

Notice how Tristar edited his post? He added the second quote and everything below.

I posted a post and the forum put two up.

He pointed out how I must be stupid because I can't seem to operate an internet forum that I have no control over.

I explained what happened and he then added to that post (1 minute later) more hate directed toward me about how I must be illiterate and uneducated and should take remedial English and what not.

Nice, misdirect and attack me when your argument is weak. Good move. I'm sure everyone will buy it.
 
I've said nothing about ACORN being maligned. I said the Church is worse.

Yes, of course. Most churches engage in voter fraud and aiding and abetting child prostitution. Exactly what color is the sky in the world you live in?

Easily verified from other sources? Then why not post THOSE sources?
You mean like the Wall Street Journal Online? That one was cleverly hidden in plain view. Again, you really should look into that English course.

I just want you to know that just because you shout real loud and find others to agree does not mean you are right.
Did this also apply for the last eight years? If so, would you please share this info with Janeane Garafalo, Michael Moore, Al Franken, et al. They appear to have missed the memo.

The MAJORITY of this great nation agree with me.
Whether or not they do depends largely on which day you ask. I'll give you on a Tuesday in November the majority of those who voted (whether entitled to or not) were fed up with the Republican party and thought John McCain was a poor choice. [Note - I happen to share those two sentiments. However, I did not choose to express them by supporting a unqualified first term senator from city rife with political corruption like the majority did.]

Notice how Tristar edited his post? He added the second quote and everything below.
Yes, I did edit my post and I was not trying to hide it. I read further after I made the original post and realized you made even less sense than I originally thought. Rather that serial post, I edited and added. While I was doing so, you were responding to my original post. Sorry if that's too hard for you to grasp.

I posted a post and the forum put two up.

He pointed out how I must be stupid because I can't seem to operate an internet forum that I have no control over.
I found it rather ironic when you are boasting about how brilliant you are. Particularly your last sentence, which apparently doesn't say what you intended.

I explained what happened and he then added to that post (1 minute later) more hate directed toward me about how I must be illiterate and uneducated and should take remedial English and what not.
We're again running into this same problem with English comprehension. I have not directed hate at you - at no point have I suggested violence against you or the denial of your civil rights, nor (I believe) have I shown "intense animosity or dislike" or "detestation."

I certainly HAVE ridiculed you for being inconsistent, inaccurate, and careless - but I don't believe that rises to the level of hatred.

You on the other hand have slandered the church and repeatedly called others racist and accused them of hatred. That comes much closer to hate than my actions.

Nice, misdirect and attack me when your argument is weak. Good move. I'm sure everyone will buy it.
Let's see - my argument is weak, eh? I'll replay this one more time for you:

Scroll back just a bit and you'll notice that you are the one claiming ACORN was not convicted of voter fraud. They were. You claimed the information was difficult to find. It wasn't.

You repeatedly call others racist with no evidence to support that conclusion. They may or may not be, but as has been pointed out, it is a common technique to selectively use the names of political figures to satirize them. I quite clearly recall people referring to "George Herbert Walker Bush" and "Danforth Quayle" in an attempt to make them appear elitist, and we won't go into the names used against the most recent George Bush.

Based on those, I'd say it is you who has the weak (more accurately, non-existant) argument. Climb down off of your toy horse and don't pretend to lecture me on misdirecting arguments.

Finally, I as previously pointed out, I ridiculed you, I did not attack you. I certainly can do so if you would like so you can see the difference, just let me know.

No one needs to buy anything I say - your poor performance in this discussion inherently discredits you to those who care to read objectively. I simply had fun pointing it out in a manner which has raised your ire.

[Note - I edited this post for an error about 45 seconds after I originally posted it. Hopefully I'm allowed to do that...]
 
Last edited:
wow, your ignorance has surpassed my interest. I guess you win. Although the Churches get more people to vote Republican and any other organization. I never said I supported ACORN. I read, speak and understand English better than most on this forum.

One more time...for the record. I pressed "post quick reply" and two posts showed up. I'm not sure what you think I should have then done other than change one to read "duplicate post". You took that to mean I'm too stupid to run a computer.

Despite the fact I now no longer care what you think does not in any way mean I retreat. I'm just sick of arguing with people who let Glenn Beck and O'Riley think for them.

Merry Halloween. Happy tomorrow and get bent.
 
The problem is you go to great lengths to highlight the "Hussein" part. Is he to be scorned or even suspect because his parents gave him a name that 39 years later the USA would be mad at a leader of Iraq with the same name? "It's his name, what's the problem?" Why don't you just call him a "Negroid" and say, "hey, it's in the dictionary...what's the problem?"

I've said nothing about ACORN being maligned. I said the Church is worse. rottonacorn.com does not come off as a very non-biased source for your anti-Obama drivel.

Easily verified from other sources? Then why not post THOSE sources?

Typical racist response, ignore reality and hate without cause. Go ahead and attack this messenger...you are a racist. Stop watching Fox.

I know I will never change your hate or your mind. I just want you to know that just because you shout real loud and find others to agree does not mean you are right. The MAJORITY of this great nation agree with me. I know that burns you up. Get therepy and move on. 2012 is taken but 2016 might be your year. Who knows?

I'm not the one associating a negative connotation with the name Hussein. You are. So who really has the problem here?

You said, and I quote, "I don't recall ACORN being "convicted of multiple instances of voter fraud". In order to help your superior intelligence I provided you with a list of examples all of which are verifiable. acornisrotten.com is certainly biased. It's also VERIFIABLY accurate. But that's unfortunate so you choose to ignore that little detail and instead complain about the name of the website.

How is disagreeing with you or Barack Hussein Obama (better?) hateful? Or racist?

As far as watching Fox News, that brings us back full circle to where this started. Fox News/Limbaugh/Hannity are extremely popular but according to you popularity is no measure of legitimacy. Unless of course we're talking about the Kenyan, then it is an accurate measure. Got it.
 
Oh, you're a "Birther"! My bad. I should have picked up on that much quicker. I usually spot a moron straight away but for some reason I thought you might have something intelligent to say. Again, my sincere appology.

Even the GOP has moved on from the "birther" movement, but there you are still plugging away calling our President a Kenyan. Any chance you want to wipe your ass with the flag or constitution before ya go?

Just for the record, I'm truley sorry I didn't identify you as retarded sooner. I must be slipping.
 
I'm not the one associating a negative connotation with the name Hussein. You are. So who really has the problem here?


Yes you are and it is obvious. You don't have to play dumb because you're doing a great job at it and you don't even realize it. Why even bother?
 
Last edited:
I was talkin to Al, when he said the 'F' word on Atlantic common once... All the flights out their had a chuckle at this idiot out in the real world. He's a goober.
 
wow, your ignorance has surpassed my interest. I guess you win. Although the Churches get more people to vote Republican and any other organization. I never said I supported ACORN. I read, speak and understand English better than most on this forum.

One more time...for the record. I pressed "post quick reply" and two posts showed up. I'm not sure what you think I should have then done other than change one to read "duplicate post". You took that to mean I'm too stupid to run a computer.

Despite the fact I now no longer care what you think does not in any way mean I retreat. I'm just sick of arguing with people who let Glenn Beck and O'Riley think for them.

Merry Halloween. Happy tomorrow and get bent.
Do not ever compare a church and acorn. Ever. You should not let Acorn do your thinking. Think for yourself, rookie.
 
wow, your ignorance has surpassed my interest.

Dear "Super Genius." Please point out where I have been ignorant. The truth is you don't like what I say but are unable to refute it. So instead your attempt to denigrate me. As you attempted to it: "Nice, misdirect and attack me when your argument is weak. Good move. I'm sure everyone will buy it."

Although the Churches get more people to vote Republican and any other organization. I never said I supported ACORN. I read, speak and understand English better than most on this forum.

You vigorously defend ACORN in spite of overwhelming evidence that they are a very corrupt organization. It obviously upsets you (though you are unable to properly express it) that those who attend church vote in a way which do not approve of. At least most of those people are actually entitled to vote, which is more than you can say for the ACORN recruits.

As for the English language, as they say in court, "Objection - assumes facts not in evidence."

One more time...for the record. I pressed "post quick reply" and two posts showed up.

Yes Forrest, I'm aware. I made fun of you since you are the one claiming to be a "super genius" and "too intelligent" for the rest of us poor morons on here.

I'm not sure what you think I should have then done other than change one to read "duplicate post". You took that to mean I'm too stupid to run a computer.

Once again you are thinking far too narrowly, but that appears to be your modus operandi.

Despite the fact I now no longer care what you think does not in any way mean I retreat. I'm just sick of arguing with people who let Glenn Beck and O'Riley think for them.

That's too bad. I would enjoy reading some actual thoughtful commentary from you. Instead you simply call others racist and denigrate those who don't support your point of view. I called you out on it, turned it around on you, and you go run and hide rather than posit an actual thoughtful argument.

By the way, I don't watch Glenn Beck or Bill O'Riley, nor do I let anyone do my thinking for me. Based on your lack of ability to form a coherent argument here, I'm not convinced I can say the same for you. Do you let MSNBC, CNN, and "The View" do your thinking for you?

Merry Halloween. Happy tomorrow and get bent.

You sure get testy when you are called out. Why not just admit that you either lied or were terribly ignorant about ACORN, and that lacking an actual argument you resort to ad homenim attacks. It won't kill you, really.
 
You vigorously defend ACORN in spite of overwhelming evidence that they are a very corrupt organization. It obviously upsets you (though you are unable to properly express it) that those who attend church vote in a way which do not approve of. At least most of those people are actually entitled to vote, which is more than you can say for the ACORN recruits.

First, if you're going to get all "Grammar Professor" on me then perhaps you should check you own posts for typos before throwing stones at me.

Second, you will have a very hard time going through this thread or even the entire forum and finding a post where I supported ACORN. I simply pointed out that the Church brings in WAY more people for the right than ACORN ever thought to bring in for the left. That is a fact and you cannot dispute it.

As for ACORN having members doing illegal things? Sure, but the Church comparison holds up here too.

Third, you've made a couple references now to my "Current Position" being Super Genius. That is a reference to my avatar and not me so settle down out there.
 
Oh, you're a "Birther"! My bad. I should have picked up on that much quicker. I usually spot a moron straight away but for some reason I thought you might have something intelligent to say. Again, my sincere appology.

Even the GOP has moved on from the "birther" movement, but there you are still plugging away calling our President a Kenyan. Any chance you want to wipe your ass with the flag or constitution before ya go?

Just for the record, I'm truley sorry I didn't identify you as retarded sooner. I must be slipping.

He is, by his own admission, African-American. What part of Africa? Kenya. So it's okay to be African-American when it's convenient, ie: affirmative action, vote for me because I'm African-American. But it's not okay to specify where in Africa his heritage is based on.

I'm not a birther, even though I am curious about all the secrecy concerning his birth certificate and his academic record. For a guy that ran on a platform of change and open-ness he sure keeps seemingly innocuous info awfully close to the chest.

Besides, I only used the term 'Kenyan' to jerk your chain. Too easy. You went after that like Michael Moore after a cheeseburger. Nice job Mr. Super Intelligence. Here fishy fishy ..........
 
Yes you are and it is obvious. You don't have to play dumb because you're doing a great job at it and you don't even realize it. Why even bother?

Well no shiite Sherlock. Of course I used it as a pejorative. That's the point. I don't like B. Hussein Obama (aka the Kenyan). He stands for everything I oppose. Good call. Brilliant!
 
What's all the fuss, nothing has changed since Obama, and nothing will. If McCain had won, things would still be as they are. Even healthcare reform will look just like it would with a republican in office.
 
Because of all the concern surrounding the nomenclature of the current resident of the White House I think it's prudent we check with the PC Czars and find out what the officially approved verbiage is. In the interim the following terms are unauthorized:

Obama
BHO
B. Hussein Obama
Barack Hussein Obama
Barack Obama
The Kenyan

Until we get a final determination from the Czars I will only use the term "Mr. President". I don't want to get charged with a hate crime and be labled a racist for using a non-approved term.
 
I believe that Mr. Barak Hussein Obama, his administration, and this democratic congress will be shown by history to be one of the most corrupt and anti-democratic in this nation's history. Mr. Obama's cheap talk on openness doesn't match his deeds. The billions in money that has been thrown around willy nilly is simply unbelievable while anyone that questions it is labeled an enemy and obstructionist. This guy is a master at deception that even the early bolshevicks in the communist movement would be proud of. And it's all possible because of the weak-minded sheeple that voted for their own screwing.

I remind my grown children who probably voted for him that the coming economic meltdown and raging inflation is THEIR fault and don't expect help from daddy. Daddy's going to be busy just trying to defend the homestead.
 
What's all the fuss, nothing has changed since Obama, and nothing will. If McCain had won, things would still be as they are. Even healthcare reform will look just like it would with a republican in office.


Ding ding ding......this is the winner! We would only be going a little slower wih the repub.........Guys BOTH PARTIES SUCK! Dont get so entrenched in the party what do you want FREEDOM or GOVT??? Very simple question, there is (was) only one country that was/is freedom AMERICA but many many many that want GOVT. Why is it that folks like Glass want to make this free country like all the others and most of them want to change to the les govt option???

I have never understood this!
 
Long Enough

Typical racist response, ignore reality and hate without cause. Go ahead and attack this messenger...you are a racist.

Why is it 'you people' throw this out??? I once remember a hope and a dream of a man being judged by the content of his character, not the color of his skin. Why is "B. Hussein Obama" racist??? Of all the years I have travelled in the middle east and the years that I lived in Africa, I think the majority of Hussein's that I met (or knew of) weren't quite
a "Negroid"
...

My problem with President Obama is that he is at best a socialist, and seems to ignore the oath of office that he took to, "...preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." - but this has been my complaint of most current Presidents. This pegs my cringe-meter regardless of their natural pigment.

You are correct in saying that we are the greatest country in the world, despite these (Al Franken included) self serving crooks in office - in both parties!!! This is due to our constitution, and the uniqueness of the principles we were founded upon. Perhaps our politicians should put the politics aside... but I'd prefer instead if they quit trying to steal their fellow citizen's property to assuage some misplaced sense of guilt, their own lack of industry or to expand the ever-growing tyranny that lies in their hearts.

Quite simply, it is their ultimate goal that I detest. These crooks you defend do not have our best interest at heart. Without calling me a racist, perhaps you can tell me why, and on what grounds you see fit to defend these men/women who have the priveledge of serving their constituency?
 
At best a socialist?

Why? Cause Fox said so?
I believe in mail. Am I a socialist? I'm all for public school. Socialist again? Now here's where I come off the tracks... I believe that my health and the health of every American it so lofty an idea that it rises above corporate profit and falls into a special place very close to the security of my family and every other American.

It seems a no brainer that health is closely related to security. We let the government handle security. I do believe they spend quite a few dollars on it. What's the problem in guarenteeing every American basic health?

I know...socialist. Forgive me.



Point two: I think we all know exactly why the government is throwing around so much money these days. There were a few headlines that were pertinent during his inauguration. It must be very convenient to not know what would have happened if nothing was done but my guess is it would have been very ugly. I can't understand why nobody is willing to give any credit where credit is due.

If giving credit or even a "Thank You" is too much then perhaps the GOP could simply stop trying to hinder EVERYTHING and being the party of "NO". There is a true nastiness in politics today and the only thing I can think that is causing it is racism.
 
Glassjaw-

Do you have any idea what the actual definition of "socialist" is? Maybe you should read a little bit. Why not start with this definition-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
skip right down to where it references "socialism in Marxist theory," and then try and explain to everyone here how this is not precisely Obama's philosphy.

Ever heard the phrase "spread the wealth around?" (Fox News did not make that up by the way-it came straight from the head-marxist-in-chief's lips.) The man is what he says he is-and he has clearly communicated the fact that he subscibes to socialist tenants many times-both before and after the election.

What it all boils down to is this: Do you think it is fair to take from me and give to someone who has not earned what I have earned? Do you think it is right to give my things to these people (who could have gone out and earned their own stuff?) Well-if you believe such things, you are a socialist, and when Barak Obama designed our economy around taking from our unborn Grandchildren and great-Grandchildren to give to those who are "less fortunate" today-then clearly, he is the very worst possible kind of socialist.

-I didn't see that on Fox News, but I sure would love to see you try to show me where my assertion is wrong.

PS.- THANK YOU Barak-For screwing my future and that of my grand children, great grand-children, and whomever else may choose to reside in this financial trainwreck of a country.... All this borrowing and insane spending to try and avoid a little pain in the short term will make things far worse in the long term-and $1 trillion extra in healthcare spending each year sure won't help that.
 
Last edited:
Glassjaw-

Do you have any idea what the actual definition of "socialist" is? Maybe you should read a little bit. Why not start with this definition-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
skip right down to where it references "socialism in Marxist theory," and then try and explain to everyone here how this is not precisely Obama's philosphy.

Ever heard the phrase "spread the wealth around?" (Fox News did not make that up by the way-it came straight from the head-marxist-in-chief's lips.) The man is what he says he is-and he has clearly communicated the fact that he subscibes to socialist tenants many times-both before and after the election.

What it all boils down to is this: Do you think it is fair to take from me and give to someone who has not earned what I have earned? Do you think it is right to give my things to these people (who could have gone out and earned their own stuff?) Well-if you believe such things, you are a socialist, and when Barak Obama designed our economy around taking from our unborn Grandchildren and great-Grandchildren to give to those who are "less fortunate" today-then clearly, he is the very worst possible kind of socialist.

-I didn't see that on Fox News, but I sure would love to see you try to show me where my assertion is wrong.

PS.- THANK YOU Barak-For screwing my future and that of my grand children, great grand-children, and whomever else may choose to reside in this financial trainwreck of a country.... All this borrowing and insane spending to try and avoid a little pain in the short term will make things far worse in the long term-and $1 trillion extra in healthcare spending each year sure won't help that.

Maybe they could try just listening to this for a moment.
But then again, you and I will both be classified as "racists."
 
B. Obama youth knives on sale now, mmm, mmm, mmm... Trade in your gun and get one free.

Most people do not understand what all this stimulus money is doing. I fly in Japan and everyday understand how weak the American dollar is. Right now it's .90 cents to the yen and experts are predicting .50 cents to the yen by 2010. You can't just throw money at a situation and hope for course correction.
 
I don't like the borrowing or printing either. But I don't blame the current administration for it. I blame the last administration for it. Bush was throwing mad money at Wall Street before Obama even came into office. Obama continued that as there is very little choice. If the economy did go into extreme melt down, as it was heading (remember the DOW at around 6200?), then it wouldn't simply be "pain in the short term". It would be soup lines for you and me and many many others. Maybe the folks flying in the back of GV's now would be less hurt but the whole of the country would have been in ruins. On a global scale there would have been millions to die of starvation and millions more to die in resource conflicts.

That has been averted, for now, and it took lots of borrowing and printing to do it. But laying the blame for that is important and the blame lies with the GOP and 8 years of unfettered power. Getting us into massively expensive wars for no reason is a good place to start.

I'm all for people getting ahead. That is the American way. I don't begrudge anyone making an honest buck. But there does need to be a balance. Everything in life needs balance.

If you give everybody the same then there is no motivation to get better and that is socialism. I'm not for that.

If you allow a system where the super rich are allowed to have ALL the money it locks everyone else down in poverty, unable to climb no matter how hard they try.

For the past decade or so the pendulum has been swinging toward the later and it needs to be corrected back a notch or two. Not all the way to "everyone has the same"...but a bit back towards that direction.

There is no way 1% should own 90% of it all. That's too far. Ya know how to tell when it's too far? The 1% become unable to convince the 99% that it's in their interest to keep the system the same and the people revolt and vote in "Change You Can Believe In".

By the way...aren't you all in a Union? A union sole purpose is to keep the 1%'ers (management) from hoarding all the benefits for themselves and force them to share with the 99%'ers (YOU!). You would think you union supporters would be more in line with the Dems. I know ALPA always supported the Dem ticket every time in my magazines.

Lastly, I do not think everyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist. I think many on the right are, but not all...not by a long shot. But when you resort to disagreeing with OUR president to the point that you call into question his middle name or which part of Africa he is referring to when defining "African-American", I have no response except to consider that you are either retarded or a racist. Maybe both.

gp

PS, the edits were to clean up grammar lest this all gets lost on spelling or sentence structure.
 
Last edited:
I don't like the borrowing or printing either. But I don't blame the current administration for it. I blame the last administration for it. Bush was throwing mad money at Wall Street before Obama even came into office. Obama continued that as there is very little choice. If the economy did go into extreme melt down, as it was heading (remember the DOW at around 6200?), then it wouldn't simply be "pain in the short term". It would be soup lines for you and me and many many others.

Both Obama and McCain were invited to the white house by then President Bush to discuss the TARP bailouts, as one of them would inherit the consequences. To my disgust, both candidates agreed it was the thing to do... this was discussed during the second or third (forgive me for being lazy) debate, which was on all news channels. A bit hard to cry foul now. I would contend that it was the overstepping of all branches of government that led to this fabricated crisis... as the legislature and the courts ruled that banks lend to people that didn't normally qualify for loans... The Fed (oh man, one could write books on these crooks) and Wall Street have their blame, but they were playing the system as it was designed to be played.

Maybe the folks flying in the back of GV's now would be less hurt but the whole of the country would have been in ruins. On a global scale there would have been millions to die of starvation and millions more to die in resource conflicts.

If you are worried about millions of people dying around the world, I would maybe start with refusing to purchase ethanol... again, there's some research involved. But I digress...

That has been averted, for now, and it took lots of borrowing and printing to do it. But laying the blame for that is important and the blame lies with the GOP and 8 years of unfettered power. Getting us into massively expensive wars for no reason is a good place to start.

How, exactly has it been averted?!? We spent approximately $42,000 per car on the cash for clunkers program... ABC news is reporting (not FOX) that the stimulus jobs are being created to the tune of $160,000 per job... Biden admits that the bailout money given to car companies will probably never be returned... the US Government has nationalized (by bailouts) over 26% of the US economy (Healthcare will bring that to a figure closer to 40%, according to the CBO), and we haven't even touched the fiscal policy of the administration. This is your money!!! Not Government's!!!

You are correct, the GOP is guilty of a lot of things as well. But I guess you didn't read my last post.

I'm all for people getting ahead. That is the American way. I don't begrudge anyone making an honest buck. But there does need to be a balance. Everything in life needs balance.

So who decides where and when its right to take from others??? There is a place for charity, but not at the barrel of the IRS or an out of control government. Your philosophy that there needs to be a balance. What does that even mean... how do you come up with that? Think about the logical means to that end for a moment.

If you give everybody the same then there is no motivation to get better and that is socialism. I'm not for that. If you allow a system where the super rich are allowed to have ALL the money it locks everyone else down in poverty, unable to climb no matter how hard they try.

I think your heart is in the right place, and I'm not patronizing you at all. I love the fact that we can all rise up and succeed in the US. What I said in my last post I meant. We have the greatest system that the world has ever seen. The founders were very careful not to establish a static class system through their fiscal policy (as evidenced in the federalist papers and the constitution). We are progressing to a dangerous point in our short history, where by the policies of corporatism and special interests, the common man has lost his voice, and may soon be discarded into a feudalistic system of serfdom. The easy thing to say is "make everyone equal, down with the rich, its not fair!" You strive for a Utopia, but get instead the tyranny of the lowest common denominator.

For the past decade or so the pendulum has been swinging toward the later and it needs to be corrected back a notch or two. Not all the way to "everyone has the same"...but a bit back towards that direction.

Yes, the pendulum is too far from individual liberty. So, there is this misconception of left v. right. I contend that it is always liberty v. tyranny. What you say "a bit back towards that direction" is a very, very slippery slope.

There is no way 1% should own 90% of it all. That's too far. Ya know how to tell when it's too far? The 1% become unable to convince the 99% that it's in their interest to keep the system the same and the people revolt and vote in "Change You Can Believe In".

We agree!!! The government shouldn't own any of it!!! (okay, so maybe you don't find that funny, but it was worth a shot)

I don't think that 1% owns 90% of it all. We all have the right to private property in this country. That includes money, wealth and all your stuff. Your house, your land, etc. Some may have more than you. Get over it brother, there's always going to be greed and envy...

How about the FAIR TAX!?! We'll all be treated equally (no sarcasm)!!!

By the way...aren't you all in a Union? A union sole purpose is to keep the 1%'ers (management) from hoarding all the benefits for themselves and force them to share with the 99%'ers (YOU!). You would think you union supporters would be more in line with the Dems. I know ALPA always supported the Dem ticket every time in my magazines.

Nope, not in a Union. Being a contract (now full-time) pilot, I miraculously managed to negotiate my contract all by lonesome. I think you need to review your history of unions. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate all of the work that ALPA and others did for this industry as far as safety and work rules, but I think you'll find that they are now just another special interest player peddling their wares.

Lastly, I do not think everyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist. I think many on the right are, but not all...not by a long shot.

Uhhhhh, what? That's like me saying many on the left are racists, but...

But when you resort to disagreeing with OUR president to the point that you call into question his middle name or which part of Africa he is referring to when defining "African-American", I have no response except to consider that you are either retarded or a racist. Maybe both.

While I am not a "birther" - I think the President could do a lot to eliminate most of this criticism. Traveling abroad to Pakistan as a young man with a foreign passport raises quite a few questions. So does attending a college while on a student visa. If those things are false, he can un-seal a lot of documents. I am not saying that the President has to make available every little thing because of the kook fringe, but there are some legitimate concerns due to things that he did as a young man. But, how does that make someone a racist???

PS, the edits were to clean up grammar lest this all gets lost on spelling or sentence structure.

I hear you man, no worries.

As for your earlier post about the government services that we have, and which are socialist... um, I think you may want to check out Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. It's really interesting. Then go to the tenth amendment, its even better. If you're curious... that's my opinion on what we should have as programs.

Suggested Reading List:

US Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers...

oh, and a great read: Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. (Not published by Glenn Beck or FOX News!!!) The name may scare you, but its exhaustively documented with some neat history.
 
wow...I thought I put too much time into posts.

Well thought out reply though. I'm still mad at the right.
 
Maybe they could try just listening to this for a moment.
But then again, you and I will both be classified as "racists."

Dammit, Scope-you are truly a world-class A#1 toolbag, but at least we found something we can finally agree on:

Barak Obama is a way bigger toolbag than the sum of both of us put together plus that of all the other toolbags we have ever known!
 
Ahhh, it was a slow start to the Cowboys game... (don't hold that against me though). As far as being mad, I understand your frustration. I'm enraged at the cavalier attitude of both parties.

It was either Jefferson or Adams (I'm sure someone will correct me, as it could be another of our founders) that talked about the uneasy truce between the citizenry and their government. We have to check them at every step! It's unfortunate, to say the least - but it's your responsibility to preserve your hard fought liberty. Get involved; with your local government, city/county meetings - lets hold ALL of these bastards accountable. This is you and your family's life they so flippantly disregard.
 
JFReservist: Fantastic reply! I am hard pressed to find anything you have said which I disagree with. Bravo!
 
Yeah, nice reply. Yet there you are with a picture of our president with the word "NOPE" on the side. Where does that leave us?

Eight years of Bush taught us to follow lock step behind our leader. I'm sure of it because I recognize those same people now telling me to paint a Hitler mustache on the Presidents image.

I conceed you and I want what's best for our country, but I'm certian the right wants what is best for corporate profits.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom