Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DOJ Criticizes CAL UAL Immunity Request

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

NavinRJohnson

Registered Gorer
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
144
From Business Travel News:


DOJ Slams DOT's Tentative Star Alliance Antitrust Approval

JUNE 29, 2009 --
The U.S. Department of Justice in a filing on Friday vigorously criticized the Department of Transportation's tentative approval of Continental Airlines' request for antitrust immunity with nine Star Alliance carriers. DOJ's filing not only further delays final approval, but could derail the immunity effort.

In a filing that spans more than 50 pages, DOJ blasted the immunity request and asked DOT to amend its tentative approval, issued in early April. DOJ noted, "DOT should deny the broad requested immunity and instead grant a more limited immunity," noting the tentative approval as it stands would reduce competition, raise fares, seep into domestic markets and offer little in the way of consumer benefits.

Continental last year laid out its plan to leave SkyTeam to tightly align with nine Star carriers through the immunity request, which was fortified by a proposed joint venture with Air Canada, Lufthansa and United (BTNonline, June 30, 2008).

The United States Attorney General Eric Holder earlier this month recommended U.S. authorities not grant antitrust immunity to Star Alliance members until DOJ finished its review of transatlantic airline competition. DOT has yet to issue a final order on the antitrust immunity application after missing its May 31 statutory deadline for a final decision (BTNonline, June 24).

DOJ in the filing dated June 26 concluded, "The immunity requested by the joint applicants is unprecedented in scope and breadth, sanctioning collusion by United and Continental on all international service, eliminating or significantly reducing competition between certain Star alliance members on routes where they provide the only—or almost all of—the competitive alternatives, and removing previously imposed protections designed to preserve competition on overlap routes."

DOT in a separate filing said it would give interested parties until July 6 to comment on DOJ's analysis, after which DOT would proceed in issuing a final order.

Continental in a statement today said it remains "confident that DOT will approve our application." The carrier said it would file a response to DOJ's published comments with DOT. "We appreciate that DOJ has submitted its comments, which will allow DOT to close the docket and move forward with the application," Continental noted.


I'm interested to see what the final immunity will look like. This could force a merger to compete with Delta, since broad immunity might not be in the cards.


 
I wonder if this has anything to do with UAL raising more cash? Getting ready for the marriage perhaps?
 
I wonder if this has anything to do with UAL raising more cash? Getting ready for the marriage perhaps?

Yep - I just heard from the girl at the hotel desk that the merger is happening FOR SURE today at 6 PM Eastern....no wait, I had a guy on the jumpseat that says it really will happen next Friday. Oh wait, I forgot - Kellner called me yesterday and said the merger is certain next month after his Friday golf game. It all makes sense right? United's books are a real peach right now...they've got multiple airbus's (which of course CAL has none), and their 757's are not compatible. Makes perfect sense.

It's all a big conspiracy!!! The sky is falling, the sky is falling. :rolleyes:
 
Heyas,

If UAL wanted a merger, they missed the boat. The NWA/DAL merger was a shoe in because of the administration. The current administration is sure to do a complete rectal exam.

If CAL doesn't want a merger, but the DOJ blocks their anti-trust immunity, things may get complicated.

Nu
 
I guess the Gov't sees that you can't be "buddy buddy" and have all of those flights to China. You need to merge, and that's it. Have fun with that relative seniority merge.......


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
You need to merge, and that's it. Have fun with that relative seniority merge.......


Bye Bye---General Lee


I predict in the next decade or so there will be MANY MANY mergers. If I were President of ALPA I would do my best to get all carriers into ALPA and then create a national seniority. I would also keep it secret and never post it on a forum.

Seriously, you may want to think about it seriously now before it's too late.
 
Heyas,

If UAL wanted a merger, they missed the boat. The NWA/DAL merger was a shoe in because of the administration. The current administration is sure to do a complete rectal exam.

If CAL doesn't want a merger, but the DOJ blocks their anti-trust immunity, things may get complicated.

Nu

So it might come down to merge or die?
 
Delta in 1 to 2 years is going to be very powerful once they fully integrate. Not trying to stroke their egos, but with their global scope it will attract a lot of business customers for one stop ticket shopping.

However, right now all their proverbial sh!t isn't in one sock as they bring it all together, so there is some breathing room. The rest of the carriers will have to do something that can compete on that scale. Either hire like there's no tomorrow and buy aircraft (highly doubtful), or merge.

This antitrust ruling will shape the future of the US airline industry. If passed the status quo may continue on for a while longer. If not, industry shakeups will happen and soon. No doubt about it.

Navin
 
F***. I think this is another nail in my coffin and the eventual merger of CAL/UAL.
 
Merger or die. It will be nice to see a bloody oozing sore covered by a 25 year band aid called CAL ALPA defend its weakling self with empty threats, non-action, selfish pilots and double talk while it rolls over on the CAL pilots.

25 years of selfishness with pilots who think they got away with but haven't. Once a bloody oozing sore always a bloody oozing sore, ie. CAL pilot.

There is no reforming a traitor who will take another pilots job.
 
Last edited:
Merger or die. It will be nice to see a bloody oozing sore covered by a 25 year band aid called CAL ALPA defend its weakling self with empty threats, non-action, selfish pilots and double talk while it rolls over on the CAL pilots.

25 years of selfishness with pilots who think they got away with but haven't. Once a bloody oozing sore always a bloody oozing sore, ie. CAL pilot.

There is no reforming a traitor who will take another pilots job.

While this may be true we all know that without a merger UAL has serious problems going forward and few give them any chance to survive on their own. Deep down (and sometimes publicly) everyone at UAL knows they're circling the drain. Years of arrogance and poor management have left a once proud carrier desperately seeking a savior. The last few weeks have seen attempts to raise cash. First UAL announces an aircraft order that no one believes is serious or would yield a single airframe inside of 8 years. The aircraft order a ruse to convince potential buyers of the newly released bond program that they are investing in a sound carrier with plans to grow and prosper. It's readily apparent there is no plan forward, no plan to become viable. Instead, "right sizing" to make the company attractive for "merger" aka last ditch buyout.

CAL has plenty of losers (98% of which are holdovers in IAH), there is no question about that. In the end, this isn't about CAL. It's about UAL and what piece of UAL is left to merge with. CAL had a look at those books and walked away from the deal. Depending on which analyst you choose to subscribe to CAL would be much better off shopping the inevitable fire sale scheduled for sometime in the coming year. Here's some light reading for you.............


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124630802244770103.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2959811120090629
 
It's never been about what's good for the employees short term or long term. It's about what's the best for investors and how quick it can line the pockets of executives. So what doesn't make sense to us, makes perfect sense to the executives. I never thought until today that a merger is going to happen. Sadly, I think I'm wrong and it's going to go down this year. Here's to a tanking career!!!
 
Heyas,

If UAL wanted a merger, they missed the boat. The NWA/DAL merger was a shoe in because of the administration. The current administration is sure to do a complete rectal exam.

If CAL doesn't want a merger, but the DOJ blocks their anti-trust immunity, things may get complicated.

Nu

DOT has final ruling - which is in favor of CAL joining the STAR alliance. DOJ only reccomends, DOT is the final approval authority.
 
It's never been about what's good for the employees short term or long term. It's about what's the best for investors and how quick it can line the pockets of executives. So what doesn't make sense to us, makes perfect sense to the executives. I never thought until today that a merger is going to happen. Sadly, I think I'm wrong and it's going to go down this year. Here's to a tanking career!!!

Dude, you sound like a broken record. Honestly, buck up - the only thing you can control is being the best flyer you can be. If we merge with United (which I don't think we will for years to come) - so be it. It is what it is.

Americans under Carter saw double digit interest rates and gas shortages and 4 years later enjoyed a great economy under President Reagan. Things will get better.

Take a step back and look at the big picture. Right now you're at an airline that constantly takes the top airline award from Forbes, is #1 in customer service from multiple sources, and has a pretty darn solid management team. Things aren't so bad.
 
Last edited:
Dude, you sound like a broken record. Honestly, buck up - the only thing you can control is being the best flyer you can be. If we merge with United (which I don't think we will for years to come) - so be it. It is what it is.

Americans under Carter saw double digit interest rates and gas shortages and 4 years later enjoyed a great economy under President Reagan. Things will get better.

Take a step back and look at the big picture. Right now you're at an airline that constantly takes the top airline award from Forbes, is #1 in customer service from multiple sources, and has a pretty darn solid management team. Things aren't so bad.


Uuuhh, so how does that help us? Who cares CAL is winning awards? How does that help our situation? Solid management team? They hedged at 140 bucks a barrel. Buck up? Just hand over that pipe you're smoking.
 
Dude, you sound like a broken record. Honestly, buck up - the only thing you can control is being the best flyer you can be. If we merge with United (which I don't think we will for years to come) - so be it. It is what it is.

Americans under Carter saw double digit interest rates and gas shortages and 4 years later enjoyed a great economy under President Reagan. Things will get better.

Take a step back and look at the big picture. Right now you're at an airline that constantly takes the top airline award from Forbes, is #1 in customer service from multiple sources, and has a pretty darn solid management team. Things aren't so bad.
\

Ha! Pan Am, EAL, Piedmont, etc. use to have all of these things as well.
 
Uuuhh, so how does that help us? Who cares CAL is winning awards? How does that help our situation? Solid management team? They hedged at 140 bucks a barrel. Buck up? Just hand over that pipe you're smoking.

Fair enough - feel free to lose sleep over crap you can't control. In the meantime I'm looking forward to a couple of Bogota overnights coming up next month.
 
Fair enough - feel free to lose sleep over crap you can't control. In the meantime I'm looking forward to a couple of Bogota overnights coming up next month.


I'm not losing any sleep over anything other than being sick as a dog with swine flu......I think. There's nothing wrong with having an interest in my career. Sure, I can't do anything about it, but it doesn't mean I have to like it. When we merge with UAL, my career....AND YOURS...will take a vertical dive. Enjoy Bogota!!!
 
After age 65, the economy, and swine flu start panning out I am afraid a merger will be the final kick in balls to a junior hire at CAL like me. Waaaahhhh. I know, but still, ALPA guys keep insisting that they have a plan in place to guaranty I will be in the same "relative" spot if a merger should take place. There's a big difference between a company growing and hiring to fill the spaces and one that just instantly doubles with pilots in place. Just don't want to go from a working job to waiting in line behind 1000 once furloghed pilots due to date of hire.
 
While this may be true we all know that without a merger UAL has serious problems going forward and few give them any chance to survive on their own. Deep down (and sometimes publicly) everyone at UAL knows they're circling the drain. Years of arrogance and poor management have left a once proud carrier desperately seeking a savior. .......http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2959811120090629

Blah Blah Blah..... that all you got?

Those years of UAL arrogance are exactly what makes the difference between CAL's bloody stains and UAL's ability to win the day. The game of merger is not about my company is better than yours. Its about a companies pilots having a stronger backbone and will than the other company.

USAIR was swirling the bowl in 2004. US Air pilots right or wrong have been setting the pace of the merger since the merger with the West started.

UAL will win the day concerning the Master Seniority List because UAL pilots have what CAL pilots don't and will never have because of CAL's history.

Get your shoe shin rag ATRCA because your going to have some boot licken to do if you forget it tomorrow.
 
Blah Blah Blah..... that all you got?

Those years of UAL arrogance are exactly what makes the difference between CAL's bloody stains and UAL's ability to win the day. The game of merger is not about my company is better than yours. Its about a companies pilots having a stronger backbone and will than the other company.

USAIR was swirling the bowl in 2004. US Air pilots right or wrong have been setting the pace of the merger since the merger with the West started.

UAL will win the day concerning the Master Seniority List because UAL pilots have what CAL pilots don't and will never have because of CAL's history.

Get your shoe shin rag ATRCA because your going to have some boot licken to do if you forget it tomorrow.


17% interest against "spare parts" to raise $175 million at a company that routinely loses $500 million a quarter. Absolute desperation has arrived at UAL. Deep down, you know you're going to be fishing for a job at Home Depot without a merger. You guys have truly arrived at the bottom of the barrel. I like the WSJ version. That's the version where AA and CAL selectively pick apart the company at CH 7 proceedings. I seriously doubt the CAL BOD will allow CAL to assume UAL debt. The same group of folks who walked away from the last UAL save attempt will probably come to the same conclusion this time around. Your desperate and lashing out, I get it. I won't hold it against you. It's a long hard fall to the bottom and you're just now coming to grips with it...........

Have fun and start taking pictures. You'll want to remember end, you know for the stories and stuff. I would also start stealing all the UAL pillows, glasses and what not. 10 years from now that junk will be worth a few bucks on ebay...................
 
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. CAL is also very highly leveraged and could also face a cash shortage crisis itself. The one thing that is certain is that the place to be now, won't be in 5-10 years.
 
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. CAL is also very highly leveraged and could also face a cash shortage crisis itself. The one thing that is certain is that the place to be now, won't be in 5-10 years.

I rarely post. I enjoy lurking. A lot of good information. Mostiy though, a lot of the same comments over and over again. UAL, for whom I work, is a great company, but one that has been poorly managed, and has been the victim of a very hostile leader towards its labor groups.

I am very tired of hearing of UAL's eventual demise. While the never ending shocks to our industry keep coming, it IS going to force the industry to change, just like the car industry. The DOJ is so hell bent on not allowing any one airline to have too much market share, because, god forbid, prices might go up. That fragmentation by having too many airlines and cheap start-ups will force the continued struggling of the airlines.

CAL is a great airline. But for everyone to think that CAL is in such great shape, and to just let UAL die and so they can pick up the pieces is fairly cocky and arrogent in my opinion. Is United in better shape? Nope. Is CAL United's saviour? Gimme a freakin' break.

From an investment news letter I get from www.stansberryresearch.com:

I'm about to tell you how I know exactly when Continental Airlines will go bankrupt. You might recall my similar work on GM. I spent about two years explaining, quarter after quarter, that there was no way the company could escape bankruptcy. Even though such information can be incredibly valuable to stock traders, my work inspired a lot of anger from our subscribers, who didn't understand my reasoning had nothing to do with cars, or "America," but simply with mathematics. GM's enormous debt load ($172 billion at last count) couldn't be supported by the car company's dwindling market share and negative profit margins. At a certain point (I'd say 2006), it became mathematically impossible for GM to ever make enough money to repay its obligations. The interest payments were compounding faster than it could ever hope to grow the business, and it didn't have enough equity left to refinance.

These situations are tragic for investors, employees, and customers. There are no easy explanations for why companies sometimes end up in these "no way out" scenarios. Thus, it may seem crass or even immoral for me to demonstrate how these situations can be the best investment opportunities of all. But I'd ask that you, if only for a minute, put aside these "good neighbor" emotions. You see, when you buy a stock, an endless number of things might go wrong. As an analyst, it is impossible for me to identify every possible business risk. And as you know, sooner or later, everything that can go wrong will go wrong.

On the other hand, when you're researching companies that are truly stuck in "no way out" scenarios, there aren't any realistic alternatives. No matter what else happens, their debts and interest payments will come due. And that means you can know, with a far higher degree of certainty, what your investing outcome will be. And so, I ask you: Would you rather own a stock that may or may not increase in value? Or would you rather short a stock that you can know, for certain, will go bankrupt by a specific date in the future?

This kind of analysis has always appealed to me because of the certainty. Most subscribers don't know my very first newsletter, written in 1999, accurately predicted the demise of the original AT&T, which was the most widely held stock in America at the time. Most recently, I told my subscribers Continental Airlines will go bankrupt. And now I can even tell you when...

The company has $105 million of equity sitting under more than $12 billion worth of debt. It operates at a loss because its gross margins have fallen in half in only three years. Fuel costs and competition have rendered its full-service, high-cost, and unionized business model obsolete – much like what happened to General Motors. It has $900 million worth of lease and capital obligations coming due this year and only $2.7 billion worth of cash left. In 2011, 40% of its $6 billion in long-term debt will come due.

But the trigger for Continental's bankruptcy will be an obscure clause in its credit-card processing agreement with Chase Bank. The agreement requires Continental to maintain at least 25% of its current obligations in cash. Next year (2010), the portion of its long-term debt that's due in 2011 will become "current" – due within the next 12 months. That will cause Continental's current obligations to soar to nearly $7 billion. At the same time, its cash reserves will be falling. The collapse of the current ratio will trigger a cascade of debt defaults, pushing the airline into bankruptcy. Thus, Continental will go bankrupt at some point in 2010.

I know Continental can do nothing to avoid a default. It only has $105 million of equity left. That's simply not enough to restructure its debts. And it can't operate profitably enough to afford to repay its debts – it doesn't even have enough cash to pay for the planes it has already agreed to buy from Boeing. If you short the stock today, I'm 100% sure you will double your money in 12 to 18 months.
 
Blah Blah Blah..... that all you got?

Those years of UAL arrogance are exactly what makes the difference between CAL's bloody stains and UAL's ability to win the day. The game of merger is not about my company is better than yours. Its about a companies pilots having a stronger backbone and will than the other company.
UAL will win the day concerning the Master Seniority List because UAL pilots have what CAL pilots don't and will never have because of CAL's history.

Get your shoe shin rag ATRCA because your going to have some boot licken to do if you forget it tomorrow.

Really? Care to make a wager on this point? I wish no ill will to any of my union brothers and sisters. As a member of the CAL MEC, I am ready to go to war to protect my pilots seniority. We have a solid MEC and that is very important in a merger. Not saying we are merging just if we do.
 
I rarely post. I enjoy lurking. A lot of good information. Mostiy though, a lot of the same comments over and over again. UAL, for whom I work, is a great company, but one that has been poorly managed, and has been the victim of a very hostile leader towards its labor groups.

I am very tired of hearing of UAL's eventual demise. While the never ending shocks to our industry keep coming, it IS going to force the industry to change, just like the car industry. The DOJ is so hell bent on not allowing any one airline to have too much market share, because, god forbid, prices might go up. That fragmentation by having too many airlines and cheap start-ups will force the continued struggling of the airlines.

CAL is a great airline. But for everyone to think that CAL is in such great shape, and to just let UAL die and so they can pick up the pieces is fairly cocky and arrogent in my opinion. Is United in better shape? Nope. Is CAL United's saviour? Gimme a freakin' break.

From an investment news letter I get from www.stansberryresearch.com:

I'm about to tell you how I know exactly when Continental Airlines will go bankrupt. You might recall my similar work on GM. I spent about two years explaining, quarter after quarter, that there was no way the company could escape bankruptcy. Even though such information can be incredibly valuable to stock traders, my work inspired a lot of anger from our subscribers, who didn't understand my reasoning had nothing to do with cars, or "America," but simply with mathematics. GM's enormous debt load ($172 billion at last count) couldn't be supported by the car company's dwindling market share and negative profit margins. At a certain point (I'd say 2006), it became mathematically impossible for GM to ever make enough money to repay its obligations. The interest payments were compounding faster than it could ever hope to grow the business, and it didn't have enough equity left to refinance.

These situations are tragic for investors, employees, and customers. There are no easy explanations for why companies sometimes end up in these "no way out" scenarios. Thus, it may seem crass or even immoral for me to demonstrate how these situations can be the best investment opportunities of all. But I'd ask that you, if only for a minute, put aside these "good neighbor" emotions. You see, when you buy a stock, an endless number of things might go wrong. As an analyst, it is impossible for me to identify every possible business risk. And as you know, sooner or later, everything that can go wrong will go wrong.

On the other hand, when you're researching companies that are truly stuck in "no way out" scenarios, there aren't any realistic alternatives. No matter what else happens, their debts and interest payments will come due. And that means you can know, with a far higher degree of certainty, what your investing outcome will be. And so, I ask you: Would you rather own a stock that may or may not increase in value? Or would you rather short a stock that you can know, for certain, will go bankrupt by a specific date in the future?

This kind of analysis has always appealed to me because of the certainty. Most subscribers don't know my very first newsletter, written in 1999, accurately predicted the demise of the original AT&T, which was the most widely held stock in America at the time. Most recently, I told my subscribers Continental Airlines will go bankrupt. And now I can even tell you when...

The company has $105 million of equity sitting under more than $12 billion worth of debt. It operates at a loss because its gross margins have fallen in half in only three years. Fuel costs and competition have rendered its full-service, high-cost, and unionized business model obsolete – much like what happened to General Motors. It has $900 million worth of lease and capital obligations coming due this year and only $2.7 billion worth of cash left. In 2011, 40% of its $6 billion in long-term debt will come due.

But the trigger for Continental's bankruptcy will be an obscure clause in its credit-card processing agreement with Chase Bank. The agreement requires Continental to maintain at least 25% of its current obligations in cash. Next year (2010), the portion of its long-term debt that's due in 2011 will become "current" – due within the next 12 months. That will cause Continental's current obligations to soar to nearly $7 billion. At the same time, its cash reserves will be falling. The collapse of the current ratio will trigger a cascade of debt defaults, pushing the airline into bankruptcy. Thus, Continental will go bankrupt at some point in 2010.

I know Continental can do nothing to avoid a default. It only has $105 million of equity left. That's simply not enough to restructure its debts. And it can't operate profitably enough to afford to repay its debts – it doesn't even have enough cash to pay for the planes it has already agreed to buy from Boeing. If you short the stock today, I'm 100% sure you will double your money in 12 to 18 months.

To me this guys loses all credibility since he is trying to profit from shorting the stock.
 
I hate'em but...

UAL will outlast CAL. In spite of itself, UAL is the stronger brand and will ultimately survive in some form or other. I do not purport to suggest that it will be a form worth a ********************, but a form nonetheless.
 
Dig up older post prior to USAir/AmWest. A lot of denial was going on then also.....especially by USAir pilots being bought.
 
UAL, for whom I work, is a great company, but one that has been poorly managed, and has been the victim of a very hostile leader towards its labor groups.

WOW About 12 years ago I said the same thing to a UA on MY jumpseat about my airline ,TWA, and was told by that UA pilot "The sooner you die the better it will be for everybody else in this industry, Its about survival and those "healthy" enough to bring the industry UP and not drag it down"......

History is funny............
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom