Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Union Resurgance

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

GogglesPisano

Pawn, in game of life
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Posts
3,939
Fears Of A Union Renaissance
Brian Wingfield, 06.05.08, 7:00 PM ET




Washington, D.C. - Who's afraid of a little organized labor? U.S. business, that's who.

Union membership encompasses just 7.5% of the private sector, but the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is fearful of a potential resurgence in the United States. Now the group, which represents business interests, is opposing a laundry list of bills fluttering about Capitol Hill, which the chamber says would make it easier to organize a union, expand worker benefits at the expense of employers and lift the caps on punitive damages sought by employees in lawsuits.

"What's going on on Capitol Hill right now is nothing less than a radical rewrite of our nation's unemployment laws," says Randel Johnson, the chamber's vice president for labor, immigration and employee benefits. As a result, the group is about to revamp its lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill and in states like Colorado and Minnesota--which will host the presidential nominating conventions later this year--to turn the tides on union expansion.

But forget 2008. "We're very concerned about the next four years," Johnson says. The prospect of Democrats controlling Congress and the White House is unsettling for foes of labor expansion. Even before Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., sealed his party's nomination for president this week, he'd already scooped up endorsements from big unions like the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the United Steelworkers Union and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

Labor issues do seem to be front and center this election season. Obama said he would consider renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement to keep more American jobs from being outsourced. Democrats in Congress have been firm about ensuring that labor clauses are part of international trade agreements, some of which are still pending. Labor disputes last week were part of what derailed merger discussions between UAL (nasdaq: UAUA - news - people ) and US Airways Group (nyse: LCC - news - people ). SEIU has waged a highly public campaign to close tax loopholes on so-called "buyout billionaires,"--private equity and hedge fund managers.

Teamsters spokesman Galen Munroe says, "It's pretty much accepted that Americans want change after the Bush administration," adding that the Employee Free Choice Act, designed to make it easier for workers to choose a union, would help strengthen the middle class. The measure didn't make it out of the Senate last year, but Obama has vowed to revive it if elected.

That's exactly what the chamber and the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, an alliance of local chambers of commerce and other business associations, fear. The groups say that because the bill would do away with the secret ballot voting that allows employees to choose a union, it would pressure individual workers to sign on. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, opposes the bill.

Even if Democrats sweep Congress and the White House in November, the chamber and other business groups appear to have an ally in the Supreme Court. In several cases last year, the court ruled in favor of business interests, including a decision that limits frivolous lawsuits against employers.

As early as next week, the court could rule whether a federal labor law pre-empts California's prohibition against employers using state money to deter union organizing campaigns. With many winds in Washington blowing in Big Labor's favor, business groups are hoping the justices come out on their side once again.

--Additional reporting by Lea Erculiani.
 
Vote pro-labor!
 
What we need is a general 1 day strike and shut the entire airline system down. Only that way would there be enough outrage to force the politicians to start managing the national transportation system instead of wringing their hands and complaining.
 
That's exactly what the chamber and the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, an alliance of local chambers of commerce and other business associations, fear. The groups say that because the bill would do away with the secret ballot voting that allows employees to choose a union, it would pressure individual workers to sign on. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, opposes the bill.
Wow... The end of secret ballot voting.

That means I can find out who the frak voted FOR T.A. 2 at AAI... SWEET! (Can't really, but it would put the pressure on for the next T.A.)

No more hiding behind your vote, boys and girls. BRING IT!! :D

(Why am I not surprised that McCain opposes it?)
 
What we need is a general 1 day strike and shut the entire airline system down. Only that way would there be enough outrage to force the politicians to start managing the national transportation system instead of wringing their hands and complaining.


Not workable...

What is workable... is a national demonstration on the DC Mall. There was one last year, but only 100 pilots showed up.... guess it wasn't that important and everything is really fine?

What do you think?
 
You gotta hand it to the Chamber of Commerce -- at least they don't try to sugar-coat their blatant, cynical self-interest.

Can't have a bunch of rabble-rousing workers trying to secure a decent wage, working conditions and job security. After all, capital is all that matters. :rolleyes:

Everyone knows that capital, not labor, does all the heavy-lifting in this economy.
 
They should be scared and trembling in their boots. All they have to do is look at how ALPA has "takin' it back" over the past 2 years.

If that doesn't scare the chamber of commerce, I don't know what will.
 
They should be scared and trembling in their boots. All they have to do is look at how ALPA has "takin' it back" over the past 2 years.

If that doesn't scare the chamber of commerce, I don't know what will.

Your sarcasm is duly noted. While the Chamber may not be trembling in their boots, they do seem to be taking the threat of organized labor resurgence somewhat seriously. After all, the more money the front-line working stiffs take home to pay for stuff, the fewer yachts and condos your CEO can buy. Can't have that. All that luxury spending is the engine of this economy, don't you know.
 
If this works, then maybe every unionized Walmart worker will demand $100,000 a year. The local LaRaza union will also demand $100 to mow your lawn. The plumbers union will be able to charge $400 to fix your toilet while you are on a trip. This will be awesome!!!!!!
 
If this works, then maybe every unionized Walmart worker will demand $100,000 a year. The local LaRaza union will also demand $100 to mow your lawn. The plumbers union will be able to charge $400 to fix your toilet while you are on a trip. This will be awesome!!!!!!

This is a simplistic and unrealistic view of what would happen. Walmart is the largest employer in America and pay the least amount of benefits per employee. They provide nothing to this country other than taking from the employees to give to the owners and CEOs.
 
Last edited:
Wow... The end of secret ballot voting.

That means I can find out who the frak voted FOR T.A. 2 at AAI... SWEET! (Can't really, but it would put the pressure on for the next T.A.)

No more hiding behind your vote, boys and girls. BRING IT!! :D

(Why am I not surprised that McCain opposes it?)


I read that entirely differently, Lear. I read it as Management would be able to see who voted for Unionization . . . . and would be free to fire those who voted for a Union, or to vote for a stronger union.

TW
 
"Simplistic and unrealistic is really about all we do here on Flightinfo"


The simplest and most realistic thing I have seen about what we do here.
 
All 70k is not needed to severely impact operations/economy/commerce etc!

That's what the PATCO controllers thought in '81, also. They figured their illegal strike would cause enough damage to get what they wanted, even if a bunch of guys crossed the lines. Didn't work out that way, did it? Tons of them ended up crossing the lines, and Reagan replaced the rest with military controllers. You think we can do better? I think not. It's a recipe for disaster.
 
I read that entirely differently, Lear. I read it as Management would be able to see who voted for Unionization . . . . and would be free to fire those who voted for a Union, or to vote for a stronger union.

TW

Incorrect. Management would never see the cards. Only the union and the NMB would see the cards.
 
Not workable...

What is workable... is a national demonstration on the DC Mall. There was one last year, but only 100 pilots showed up.... guess it wasn't that important and everything is really fine?

What do you think?

The problem with a national demonstration is that it would garner about 10 seconds of news coverage (if any at all) and maybe some news print coverage on page 12...certainly not front page news.

If somehow everyone called in sick the same day....that would be the lead story on ABC/CBS/NBC and CNN...the pundits would be talking about it for days....

Now...if they threw every pilot that participated in jail....then the whole system would REALLY be shut down.

It may be illegal, but so were the Solidarity strikes in Poland during the Cold War, and those guys faced way harsher consequences than we would (as I recall some were even killed).

Bottom line is it won't happen here, I just believe that in the grand scheme of things, a big demonstration would lead to nothing...

(now if every pilot took the day off of work to participate in said demonstration.....)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top