Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Union Resurgance

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
That's what the PATCO controllers thought in '81, also. They figured their illegal strike would cause enough damage to get what they wanted, even if a bunch of guys crossed the lines. Didn't work out that way, did it? Tons of them ended up crossing the lines, and Reagan replaced the rest with military controllers. You think we can do better? I think not. It's a recipe for disaster.

I'm fairly sure that in today's day and age, you couldn't replace pilots with pilots from the military...the military pilots are somewhat busy doing other things right now.
 
Wow... The end of secret ballot voting.

That means I can find out who the frak voted FOR T.A. 2 at AAI... SWEET! (Can't really, but it would put the pressure on for the next T.A.)

No more hiding behind your vote, boys and girls. BRING IT!! :D

(Why am I not surprised that McCain opposes it?)

That is the exact reason that there is a secret ballot. I think unions are a good thing for pilots and given the choice I would vote for one. That being said there should be a check against threats and pressure to join a union.

Judge the value of a union on the merits not on who has the bigger mouth.

SkyWest is the perfect example +50% turned in their cards, but when it came down to it only 35% voted to join. The secret ballot protects their DEMOCRATIC voice.
 
I'm fairly sure that in today's day and age, you couldn't replace pilots with pilots from the military...the military pilots are somewhat busy doing other things right now.

They wouldn't need to. Over 50% would cross the lines just because Shrub would tell them to. That's plenty to keep the economy moving long enough for him to break the unions. You can't win this battle that way. You're outgunned. You want to win? Vote pro-labor.
 
In the end...

In the end consumers will determine how many pilots work and what they will be paid. Management cannot do it, unions cannot do it and the gov't cannot do it. It seems those who posted in the past that the consumer would accept higher prices in order to pay the pilots more, have been wrong. Prices have gone up due to fuel and passengers buying tickets have gone down. We see it everywhere, lay offs, stopped hiring, airplanes being parked. It may down size to the point that only the rich fly on 10% of today's market and 95% of today's pilots will be unemployed or downgraded. But those who keep their Captain's seat; it will be the glory days again.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure they have ways of finding out.

If they did, then they would already be able to do it, because Authorization for Representation cards already contain the employee's name and are already seen by the NMB and the union. The only difference with the EFCA would be that the representation cards would be used for the official certification of the union rather than a second phone vote.
 
You want to win? Vote pro-labor.

I'm voting for Obama, just like you. However, if you truly expect him to be "pro-labor" then I think you will be sorely disappointed. Obama's administration will turn just as blind an eye to the dismantling of organized labor as Bush's administration did.
 
I'm voting for Obama, just like you. However, if you truly expect him to be "pro-labor" then I think you will be sorely disappointed. Obama's administration will turn just as blind an eye to the dismantling of organized labor as Bush's administration did.

And on what do you base this theory? The Dems have been desperately trying to push the Employee Free Choice Act through for several years against massive Republican opposition. The Dems have tried repeatedly to raise the minimum wage, always against massive Republican opposition. Democratic Presidents have always appointed pro-labor members to the NMB and NLRB. Republicans have always appointed anti-labor, pro-big-business members to these boards, with Dubya being the absolute worst offender. The Republicans tried to push through a bill that would make any strike by an airline labor group to be a "terrorist action." This was defeated by the Democrats, thankfully.

Sorry, but in every case, the Dems come to our defense as the Reps try to tear us apart to help their big-business buddies. Them's just the facts.
 
Sorry, but in every case, the Dems come to our defense as the Reps try to tear us apart to help their big-business buddies. Them's just the facts.
Oh, you're in for rude awakening should O win. Of course, with oil where it is today and where it is heading, our jobs may not even exist in a year.
 
This is a simplistic and unrealistic view of what would happen. Walmart is the largest employer in America and pay the least amount of benefits per employee. They provide nothing to this country other than taking from the employees to give to the owners and CEOs.

That's right, Wal Mart provides nothing..... becides low prices, massive tax revenue, etc.
 
That's right, Wal Mart provides nothing..... becides low prices, massive tax revenue, etc.

And poverty for their employees, forcing their health care costs onto the state medicaid programs, driving good small businesses out of business, etc... WalMart needs to die.
 
Other benefit

That's right, Wal Mart provides nothing..... becides low prices, massive tax revenue, etc.
Not to mention a major factor in controlling inflation, you can not raise prices if there is a Wal-Mart here you.
 
Last edited:
Not to mention a major factor in controlling inflation, you can not raise prices if there is a Wal-Mart here you.
Thank you pilotyip. This is an often overlooked benefit of walmart. Do you think target would charge higher or lower prices if walmart didn't exist?


PCL: The free market (ie millions upon millions of people that decide to shop at walmart) says it is good.

No walmart employee is forced to work there, and no one is forced to stay working there. If they don't have the mental capacity or motivation to move up, or move on to a higher paying job, that is not walmart's problem.

Walmart does far more to help the poor that you think it does to harm them. I recall that they will sell perscription drugs for $5. Your SS check will buy you more at walmart than anywhere else.
 
If this works, then maybe every unionized Walmart worker will demand $100,000 a year. The local LaRaza union will also demand $100 to mow your lawn. The plumbers union will be able to charge $400 to fix your toilet while you are on a trip. This will be awesome!!!!!!
This shows how stupid the average airline pilot is, while you have been living rent free in your parents basement, they have been paying the bills. If you can get away with a $400.00 plumbing bill, you are lucky, ask your mom, she probably had to blow the plumber just to get her senior discount! And you don't even wanna know what she did for/to the lawnmower driver. All while you were on that 5 day reserve tour.
PBR
 
That's right, Wal Mart provides nothing..... becides low prices, massive tax revenue, etc.
Low prices that make the Chinese government rich, massive tax costs due to lack of benefits to it's part time labor force. Why do you think communities all over the country try to block Wallymart from building in their communities, the Wallymart way of business is expensive for the local economy.
Stupid, stupid, stupid
wake up
PBR
 
Low prices that make the Chinese government rich, massive tax costs due to lack of benefits to it's part time labor force. Why do you think communities all over the country try to block Wallymart from building in their communities, the Wallymart way of business is expensive for the local economy.
Stupid, stupid, stupid
wake up
PBR

Exactly. Amazing that the WalMart lovers can't see this.
 
You think you're going to get 70,000 pilots to all strike on the same day in an illegal strike? Good luck. I'd bet over half would cross the lines just because King George Dubya tells them to.

Dubya would just declare a nat'l pilot strike as a threat to nat'l security and the Department of Homeland Security would gain authority to "detain" :rolleyes: anyone involved in labor actions......wouldn't put it past our monkey-brained president.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. Amazing that the WalMart lovers can't see this.

Whatever, but I sure do like their dividends. Don't like Walmart? Buy some shares, your opinion will change.

Oh the poor, downtrodden proletariat. :rolleyes:
 
Dubya would just declare a nat'l pilot strike as a threat to nat'l security and the Department of Homeland Security would gain authority to "detain" :rolleyes: anyone involved in labor actions......wouldn't put it past our monkey-brained president.

Ain't that the truth.
 
Whatever, but I sure do like their dividends. Don't like Walmart? Buy some shares, your opinion will change.

Oh the poor, downtrodden proletariat. :rolleyes:

Sorry, but I have no desire to benefit from dividends at the expense of the employees that can't afford health care, let alone stock. WalMart is evil.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top