Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Recurrent training/checking is the responsibility of the operator. I don't know why pilots have allowed these operators to put the onus for the cost of 135 training on them. You can argue whether you should pay for initial Type Rating, but the cost of meeting 135 requirements has traditional been, and should remain, a cost to the operator.Does any one know of any FAR part 135/management companies that require a signing of a Recurrent Training Contract?
Does any one know of any FAR part 135/management companies that require a signing of a Recurrent Training Contract?
Particularly inasmuch as 135.351(a) puts the requirement squarely on the operator.I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the legal proceedings after someone is fired for refusing to sign a contract for recurrent.
That could be the reason they never seem to have enough pilots, and are always advertising for same.Pegasus Elite/Segrave Aviation is pulling this stunt also.
US Jets/KAHN.
Are they still around and flying off a defunct Certificate number from Miami? and a host of
broke, busted and disgusted learjets?
Owner is a snake. [Partner] moneybags, bank
board member from PFN is silent partner and
owns all the planes. He is a snake, too. Just
goes to show how pathetic the FAA is at
regulating and policing their own bureaucracy.
Didn't we all put this new and improved Ops
Spec page in all of our Documents to verify
and account for operational control? Just
how in the he77, did fireball get past this
little obstacle?
(shaking head and holding in hands with disgust)
100-1/2
I would politely refuse.. know people that have....F em!