Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Future hiring of Skywesters

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I don't think SWAPA is the only one. I foresee a lot of union groups avoiding Skywest pilots if the drive fails. No pilot based hiring board wants to take on a bunch of anti union management koolaid drinkers who will work to subvert the union.


Attitudes like this screws all the pilots who are not "koolaid drinkers" and DO vote yes and the union fails. It also bolsters the hiring potential of the real anti-union "koolaid drinkers" if SkyWest becomes a union shop. It is sad that idiots like this SWA captain cannot see past his own ass and hire based on the qualifications of an applicant instead of emotional response.
 
I suppose that the last time ALPA was voted down no one was hired either... idiot.

This is the first time OTHER unions have become involved, put in the spotlight, and supported the drive. He did not say that they won't hire Skywesters, he just said it could affect. I am not saying that it is right, but it is something you all at Skywest need to think about.
 
No different than Gojets to me, they can just think us for what the do have !!! I don't care how you vote!!

Will be funny if ALPA national sends out notification to the hiring pools of the no vote and they don't want anything to do with ALPA...

ALPA has more money and they will get the last laugh!!
 
Brickair7777 said:
Every time I start really leaning towards voting for alpa some asa toolbox comes up with a statement like this and pisses me off to the point of voting no out of spite....

Ok, you have me here, I'm with you...

Brickair7777 said:
I know GD well that major pilot groups don't even care about regional scabs and alter-egos...why would they worry about whether a regional that is in the top 20% compensation bracket votes in a union? That's right, they don't...

Maybe this is true, not sure...

Brickair7777 said:
I'll debate the merits all day long...BUT DON'T F*CKING TRY TO INTIMIDATE ME!

With you 100% here bro!!!!

Brickair7777 said:
I'M NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR ORGANIZED CRIMINALS! If I wanted to be part of that, I'd be a teamster and hijack delivery trucks on my days off.

huh??

Brickair7777 said:
COUNT ME AS ONE MORE CONFIRMED NO VOTE! And I'm going to call RIGHT NOW so I don't change my mind later!

That's insane!!

Ok, now listen; I'm just as pissed off as you are about the rhetoric FROM BOTH SIDES!!!! (Read my other posts on the topic) But to vote no because you're pissed at one side more than the other is ridiculous, wastes your vote and DOESN'T HELP OUR PILOT GROUP!!!

I'm not trying to tell you how to vote other than to VOTE SMART. They win if you vote because of emotion. Just think about it for a bit.

Put down the phone, stop reading FI for awhile, re-think the MERITS of both sides and make a good decision based on that. You're a fellow pilot of mine, I support your decision, just make it a decision based on something other than Flight Info BS, ok?

Fly Safe.

-JP
 
So vote no. I really don't care what you think, "toolbox". It's your career.

And if this is the deciding factor for you, you're really more ignorant than I thought.

See my above post on this...

Hey John, been meaning to ask you, where was that picture taken?
 
or maybe they stopped hiring them because of the typical SkyWest macho attitude? Southwest hires on personality and nobody wants to spend 4 days with some know it all!!!!
 
Jumpseating to work the other day on SWA and was able to chat with a "hiring board captain" and a SWAPA rep. His exact words were,

"Well we are carefully following the current Skywest ALPA drive. Our union feels that it would be in the best interest for Skywest to vote a union in. We have always really liked hiring from Skywest, and will probably continue to do so in the future, but my hands would be tied if our union and hiring board take a position to the fact that they are really starting to be known as an anti-union group. It may very well affect the hiring of them in the future, but I think it may be more a reducuction in interview numbers (of skywesters) and not necessarily the hiring percentage. I must admit that our actual hires out of Skywest has dropped as we have interviewed many and only a few were hired. We will have to see how the drive turns out, only time will tell on this one. I do strongly sugest that they do vote ALPA in, it can only help the hiring of them industry wide. Many boards are made up of pilots, the same pilots who want better QOL, work rules, pay and so on. It is in thier best interest to hire from a group a people that stand to uphold the same desires, and not from a group that will roll over to management."

I know some of you will flamebait this, but whatever, take it for what it's worth. I was there and I did not vote for union on previous drives, but I sure would right now. You have no idea what the security of a union feels like until you have it.

Yogi


Yeah your so full of $hit!!!!!!
 
dontfeedthebear...

You have lost it. I have nor will I ever be discriminated against because I am SkyWest. I can't even begin to tell you how rediculous this post is.

Newsflash...not voting for ALPA doesn't mean you're antiunion...you may just feel that the union will not benefit you. I have had a union rep tell me that I had valid reasons for not wanting to vote in a union here...no blacklist for me.

Hey...Let me guess; are you going to make another post on the majors board saying...
"I was jumpseating on UPS the other day and the Captain told me if USAir votes out ALPA that we won't be hiring anymore of them".

Get real guys.
 
or maybe they stopped hiring them because of the typical SkyWest macho attitude? Southwest hires on personality and nobody wants to spend 4 days with some know it all!!!!

We can agree on one point, Southwest does favor personality over less favorable attributes, such as, but not limited to stereotyping an entire company as “macho”. It is quite ignorant, insulting and presumptuous to refer to an entire group of pilots you have never met. Generalizing or not that attitude won’t get you very far in life. Least of all four days in the cockpit.
 
Jumpseating to work the other day on SWA and was able to chat with a "hiring board captain" and a SWAPA rep. His exact words were,

"Well we are carefully following the current Skywest ALPA drive. Our union feels that it would be in the best interest for Skywest to vote a union in. We have always really liked hiring from Skywest, and will probably continue to do so in the future, but my hands would be tied if our union and hiring board take a position to the fact that they are really starting to be known as an anti-union group. It may very well affect the hiring of them in the future, but I think it may be more a reducuction in interview numbers (of skywesters) and not necessarily the hiring percentage. I must admit that our actual hires out of Skywest has dropped as we have interviewed many and only a few were hired. We will have to see how the drive turns out, only time will tell on this one. I do strongly sugest that they do vote ALPA in, it can only help the hiring of them industry wide. Many boards are made up of pilots, the same pilots who want better QOL, work rules, pay and so on. It is in thier best interest to hire from a group a people that stand to uphold the same desires, and not from a group that will roll over to management."

I know some of you will flamebait this, but whatever, take it for what it's worth. I was there and I did not vote for union on previous drives, but I sure would right now. You have no idea what the security of a union feels like until you have it.

Yogi


Nice try....
 
I dont believe any of this. SWA is much more concerned with their fuel hedges running out then if SKW voted down ALPA or not.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom