Besides, the "no recommendation is a failure" is what is currently practiced anyways from what I understand..
It's not practiced in the same way the T.A. is written from a language/interpretation standpoint.
Currently, if you don't get recommended, you are returned to the line without further training, as you haven't actually "failed" anything. No pink slip on your FAA record, and your PRIA record simply indicates you withdrew from upgrade and you spend a year in your old position before you get to try again.
You could *consider* that a "failure", the company does simply for the purposes of determining when you could come back for another upgrade/transition attempt, but the difference is there is no "termination risk" from multiple "failure to recommend" events, and a guy who just couldn't hack the upgrade would be a permanent F/O, but never at risk to be terminated for it.
The new T.A. puts those F/O's now at risk for termination. Granted, you're talking about probably 1-2% of the pilot group (10-20 guys), but I'm not interested in throwing ANYONE under the bus like that. Absolutely ZERO need for that to be added to the contract.
Incidentally, I didn't find the schoolhouse to be terribly bad or absolutely "the best". The curriculum needs tweaking, but the CBT is good, the VPT sessions are EXCELLENT for developing flows and reinforcing systems understanding, and the instructors were all very knowledgeable and VERY willing to help if you had a good attitude and asked for the help.
There WAS an undercurrent of "you'd better be at your best or you're out of here", but I think a lot of that was self-imposed by guys who freak during training anyway. Is it stressful? Sure; your career is on the line. Do they make it worse? Not really, and certainly not intentionally in any kind of "intimidation" exercise. It's just old school "Learn it our way or hit the road." If you can handle that with a good attitude, you'll be just fine, and might even enjoy it.