PositiveRate
Refugee
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2002
- Posts
- 728
Without a mutual desire to fight for a better contract, we are all doomed to fail.
The reality is that this is the wrong fight for all of us. The award is binding and won't be thrown out. And while we haggle to no avail for what will surely be months, the chance for a joint contract will quickly pass us by.
If we were all fighting like heck together, within a year we'd likely have a contract with top line narrowbody pay around 170-180 for CA and 110-120 for FO's as well as 13-15% B plan, better workrules, etc. This would be a modest, but welcome improvement for the West and a huge jump forward for the East.
So, what do we want more? Money and power together or should we continue to offer our services on the cheap to management and make it as easy as possible for them to whipsaw us to their benefit for DECADES to come? The later is the road many seem scarily happy to be on at the moment.
The reality is that this is the wrong fight for all of us. The award is binding and won't be thrown out. And while we haggle to no avail for what will surely be months, the chance for a joint contract will quickly pass us by.
If we were all fighting like heck together, within a year we'd likely have a contract with top line narrowbody pay around 170-180 for CA and 110-120 for FO's as well as 13-15% B plan, better workrules, etc. This would be a modest, but welcome improvement for the West and a huge jump forward for the East.
So, what do we want more? Money and power together or should we continue to offer our services on the cheap to management and make it as easy as possible for them to whipsaw us to their benefit for DECADES to come? The later is the road many seem scarily happy to be on at the moment.
Last edited: