http://www.avweb.com/podcast/files/2007-04-30.mp3
OK, here we go. Another debate about ‘college training’ vs ‘non-college training’ – in this case, no training at all.
I have always maintained that in aviation, a ‘specific college’ degree in flight or ATC training does not necessary make you a better pilot or Air Traffic Controller. We all have our own opinions and we should all respect those who differ from us on this topic. Still, I would like to invite all to debate on this: For & Against. Both for Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers.
Now, once you hear this Podcast and read other recent FAA ‘new-hire’ drive news, you’d realize that there really is a ‘class’ issue going on between the college-trained new –hires and non-college trained new hires.
In some ways it reminds me of discussions on this board about pilots who had to log many thousands of hours, accumulate more debt, work longer hours as CFI/freightdogs etc., before finally securing the 121 Turbine job vs. those who got hired to fly modern regional jets with much lower time, i.e., 300-800 hour range. Or…could we really compare this issue with the ATC issue?
I ask every one not to put down either side, but simply discuss the issue, root causes, and what could be done. Or is this even an issue? Why would a college-trained ATC controller have an issue with those without it simply because the first party decided to go to college and accumulated debt.
Thanks all for their input.
OK, here we go. Another debate about ‘college training’ vs ‘non-college training’ – in this case, no training at all.
I have always maintained that in aviation, a ‘specific college’ degree in flight or ATC training does not necessary make you a better pilot or Air Traffic Controller. We all have our own opinions and we should all respect those who differ from us on this topic. Still, I would like to invite all to debate on this: For & Against. Both for Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers.
Now, once you hear this Podcast and read other recent FAA ‘new-hire’ drive news, you’d realize that there really is a ‘class’ issue going on between the college-trained new –hires and non-college trained new hires.
In some ways it reminds me of discussions on this board about pilots who had to log many thousands of hours, accumulate more debt, work longer hours as CFI/freightdogs etc., before finally securing the 121 Turbine job vs. those who got hired to fly modern regional jets with much lower time, i.e., 300-800 hour range. Or…could we really compare this issue with the ATC issue?
I ask every one not to put down either side, but simply discuss the issue, root causes, and what could be done. Or is this even an issue? Why would a college-trained ATC controller have an issue with those without it simply because the first party decided to go to college and accumulated debt.
Thanks all for their input.