Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

VS buys 24 787s

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

jonjuan

Honey Ryder
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Posts
4,155
http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/artic...4-24_04-39-28_N24348000&type=comktNews&rpc=44

Virgin gets in line for BAs new 787. Do you get first in line dibs if your are not in bankruptcy? I would think that Branson could actually afford the 787 while not giving his staff millions. I wonder if VS lost 3/4 of its cash over thae past 4 years and still isn't making money. I wonder.

We at DL supposedly will get some in 2008 too, except we did it via a lessor (who is not in BK). There are many ways to do things in this business, sonny.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Expect to see Virgin use some of these 787s on non-UK flights to the US (from other points in Europe) - more of a regional strategy now that any European airline can operate from any European airport to the US (so long as they have adequate gate space at various airports). Virgin will likely use its popular brand to expand from other European points. Certainly Gatwick, Manchester and other UK regional airports will likely benefit with some VS 787 service too. However, LHR will be the big play and I don't think VS has many extra slots at Heathrow to expand unless they acquire BMI or someone else with gates/slots. Either that or Virgin's alliance partners will have to give VS some slots so that the alliance benefits with more Heathrow revenue. What Heathrow needs now is another runway but that ain't gonna happen any time soon...........

Should be interesting to watch the crowded skies across the pond as Ryanair and others jump in with 787s, etc.
 
Last edited:
Delta hasn't begun a campaign to fill the gap between its 76-seat regional jets and 142-seat MD-80s, but its business plan calls for 25 small-gauge narrowbodies by 2010.

The carrier is taking on 15 124-seat Boeing 737-700s, but Chief Operating Officer Jim Whitehurst recently said those aircraft are targeted for very specific performance-limited airports, citing Vail, Mexico City and some islands in the Caribbean, where the carrier currently has to fly 757s and would like to have fewer seats or operate additional frequencies.

The 737-700s slated for the targeted markets aren't viewed as small-gauge, narrowbody aircraft. Whitehurst explained that for markets such as Atlanta-Knoxville or -Buffalo, Delta does have a gap between 76-seats and 142-seats, and "we will look at all the alternatives out there to close that gap."

Delta will also likely need to make a widebody replacement decision within 12 months. Whitehurst pointed out the airline probably won't need new aircraft until 2011 or 2012 -- the point Delta where will have exhausted its move of widebody aircraft from domestic to international service. At that time, Delta will need replacement of some of its older 767s, as well as additional growth.

Delta is stretching the 767s "as far as we can," Whitehurst said, explaining the carrier is putting a horizontal crew rest on a subfleet of the 767s, so they are capable of flying them longer than 12 hours. That capability allowed Delta to announce its Atlanta-Lagos and JFK-Tel Aviv routes. Whitehurst said the 767's mission is about 13 hours, and the 787 would supply an additional mission capability that Delta does not have today, and that's something the carrier would be interested in, assuming it selects the 787.
 
We at DL supposedly will get some in 2008 too, except we did it via a lessor (who is not in BK). There are many ways to do things in this business, sonny.


Bye Bye--General Lee

2008 seem a bit early for delta. A year behind Continental and Northwest if luckly.
 
Last edited:
Delta hasn't begun a campaign to fill the gap between its 76-seat regional jets and 142-seat MD-80s, but its business plan calls for 25 small-gauge narrowbodies by 2010.

The carrier is taking on 15 124-seat Boeing 737-700s, but Chief Operating Officer Jim Whitehurst recently said those aircraft are targeted for very specific performance-limited airports, citing Vail, Mexico City and some islands in the Caribbean, where the carrier currently has to fly 757s and would like to have fewer seats or operate additional frequencies.

The 737-700s slated for the targeted markets aren't viewed as small-gauge, narrowbody aircraft. Whitehurst explained that for markets such as Atlanta-Knoxville or -Buffalo, Delta does have a gap between 76-seats and 142-seats, and "we will look at all the alternatives out there to close that gap."

Delta will also likely need to make a widebody replacement decision within 12 months. Whitehurst pointed out the airline probably won't need new aircraft until 2011 or 2012 -- the point Delta where will have exhausted its move of widebody aircraft from domestic to international service. At that time, Delta will need replacement of some of its older 767s, as well as additional growth.

Delta is stretching the 767s "as far as we can," Whitehurst said, explaining the carrier is putting a horizontal crew rest on a subfleet of the 767s, so they are capable of flying them longer than 12 hours. That capability allowed Delta to announce its Atlanta-Lagos and JFK-Tel Aviv routes. Whitehurst said the 767's mission is about 13 hours, and the 787 would supply an additional mission capability that Delta does not have today, and that's something the carrier would be interested in, assuming it selects the 787.

Uhm, could you make your font a little more stealth? lol
 
Uhm, could you make your font a little more stealth? lol
It's an age 60 test. If you can't read it, you have identified yourself as over the age of 60 and your opinions are thus ignored.
 
What is Victorias Secret going to do with 787s?
 
Over 60?

It's an age 60 test. If you can't read it, you have identified yourself as over the age of 60 and your opinions are thus ignored.

Oh no, what if I'm under 60 crowd, does it mean I'm going blind???

Where's that darn SEND button?...

414 - your avatar makes me...confused?
 
It's an age 60 test. If you can't read it, you have identified yourself as over the age of 60 and your opinions are thus ignored.

hey- i thought there weren't going to be any changes to the medical quals. oh boy!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom