Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Actual Combat

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
So what is the mission of the new 737-700 . . . ? Mil designation?
Thanks,
'Props

DV airlift out of Hickam (1 acft), Ramstein (1 acft) and Andrews (ultimately 4 acft)

Hickam acft primarily supports COMPACOM and COMPACAF on world-wide DV missions, but has been tasked for even higher level DV movement.

Ramstein support is similar for European Commander.

Andrews birds are part of the 89th fleet and get tasked with virtually any DV flying, but have done a lot of middle east support since coming on board....they also fly/"back up" highest level PAG missions.

Military designation = C-40

Sweet ride --- all glass, left-seat HUD, Cat III, autothrottle/autoland, VNAV, RNAV, typically flown with 3 pilots, 2 radio operatiors, 2-4 flight attendants and 2 crew cheifs due to ETOPS requirements.

Hickam bird carries 26 pax max, with max crew size of 13....extra gas tanks in the belly provide very long range. Routinely flys Hickam to Andrews non-stop, but typically can't make it back without a refueling stop on the west coast due to winds.

Longest missin I flew was a 10.5 from Germany to Kansas --- but I believe the Hickam record a few years ago was an 11.0
 
So what is the mission of the new 737-700 . . . ? Mil designation?
Thanks,
'Props

The Navy is slowly replacing the C-9's with 737's known as C-40A's. The Navy is also supposed to replace the P-3 Orion with 737's. They will be known as "MMA" or Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft. Don't know if the letter/number designation has been established yet. Hopefully the funding won't get cut.
 
Do most mil pilots never see any actual combat?
CX, over there, every time they're shot at, whether transitioning on an approach or picking it up from a hover, they're seeing actual combat.
 
CX, over there, every time they're shot at, whether transitioning on an approach or picking it up from a hover, they're seeing actual combat.


I would actually change that defiition a little. Officially, the AF determines what is combat time and what isn't. Currently, any flights over the airspace of Iraq, Afghanistan, and, I think, Pakistan, is considered Combat time. As far as actual combat, I'd say the the threat of being shot at is what should be considered actual combat. In the entire time I flew over there, I was only "shot at," as in directly engaged by someone trying to shoot my aircraft down specifically, with a decent chance of actually doing so, twice. However, I'd say that I've been in actual combat more than just those two instances. It gets kind of weird sometimes, with all of the chest thumping in the military (esp AFSOC) about who and who hasn't been in combat, who did more, who deserved what medal, who had the more dangerous job, who's been shot at, blah blah blah. Gets kind of old sometimes.
 
I think as a general rule of thumb, if it's grey (or P-3 white), you're eligible to be shot at. Regardless of what you fly. I had someone try to tell me tanker guys shouldn't log combat time the other day. I wanted to scream.
 
I would actually change that defiition a little. Officially, the AF determines what is combat time and what isn't. Currently, any flights over the airspace of Iraq, Afghanistan, and, I think, Pakistan, is considered Combat time. As far as actual combat, I'd say the the threat of being shot at is what should be considered actual combat. In the entire time I flew over there, I was only "shot at," as in directly engaged by someone trying to shoot my aircraft down specifically, with a decent chance of actually doing so, twice. However, I'd say that I've been in actual combat more than just those two instances. It gets kind of weird sometimes, with all of the chest thumping in the military (esp AFSOC) about who and who hasn't been in combat, who did more, who deserved what medal, who had the more dangerous job, who's been shot at, blah blah blah. Gets kind of old sometimes.


Give me a break Deuce, Only shot at twice! You did low levels out of Little Rock. You probably go shot at on every flight by some drunk redneck in his beat up 1992 Chevy pick up truck.:laugh:
 
After my first desert tour right out of Little Rock I had more combat time than regular time in the Herk. Off course a lot of that time is droning on the way in and out, but it still sounds cool...

As far as getting shot at I only saw incoming once, and even that was questionable...It's amazing, somehow the insurgents know only to shoot at active duty airplanes! Any guard/reserve guy who has sat through an OIF/OEF intel brief knows what I'm talking about.
 
It's hard to get medals if you've never been shot at, plus if you only do one tour you have to have some stories to tell back at home.
 
It's hard to get medals if you've never been shot at, plus if you only do one tour you have to have some stories to tell back at home.

Are you kidding? The Air Force gives medals/ribbons just for going through training.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top