RJDC Litigation Update November 7, 2006
In sworn depositions the RJDC lawsuit, which seeks among other things the elimination of the job protection elements of Collective Bargaining Agreements and the wholesale whipsaw of the industry, has suffered a serious set back.
Senior CMR MEC officials have admitted under oath that:
ASA and CMR flying is NOT highly integrated with Delta operations
and that DAL Scope is NOT a threat to the interests and collective bargaining power of ASA and CMR
That there is NO irreconcilable conflict of interest due to ALPA’s dual obligation to Delta pilots and the ASA and CMR pilots
That it would be inappropriate for a member of one MEC to enter uninvited into the negotiations of another MEC
That during the collective bargaining process MEC’s have the autonomy to make their own decisions, bargain for their own pilots and set their own strategies
That ALPA has NOT discriminated against the CMR pilots
That the PID request was improper and authored by Dan (Ford), not the CMR MEC Chairman
These stunning revelations, made under oath by CMR MEC officials, will only hasten the inevitable dismantling of an ill conceived and short sited lawsuit. At no time did any CMR MEC official, under oath, charge that ALPA’s action had been arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith.
In sworn depositions the RJDC lawsuit, which seeks among other things the elimination of the job protection elements of Collective Bargaining Agreements and the wholesale whipsaw of the industry, has suffered a serious set back.
Senior CMR MEC officials have admitted under oath that:
ASA and CMR flying is NOT highly integrated with Delta operations
and that DAL Scope is NOT a threat to the interests and collective bargaining power of ASA and CMR
That there is NO irreconcilable conflict of interest due to ALPA’s dual obligation to Delta pilots and the ASA and CMR pilots
That it would be inappropriate for a member of one MEC to enter uninvited into the negotiations of another MEC
That during the collective bargaining process MEC’s have the autonomy to make their own decisions, bargain for their own pilots and set their own strategies
That ALPA has NOT discriminated against the CMR pilots
That the PID request was improper and authored by Dan (Ford), not the CMR MEC Chairman
These stunning revelations, made under oath by CMR MEC officials, will only hasten the inevitable dismantling of an ill conceived and short sited lawsuit. At no time did any CMR MEC official, under oath, charge that ALPA’s action had been arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith.
Last edited: