Luvin' it...SWA 2nd time hopefuls!

[hyperboy]

I interviewed on Sept. 19th. I got the letter the first time. Sure it hurt but we need to stick together. I can't wait for my next chance. Hopefully we can stay informed and connected for those like me have always dreamed of working at SWA.

 

[jv123]

2nd time is a charm

I think the second time is more rewarding for most (there with ya)

 

[capt. megadeth]

I think the second time is more rewarding for most (there with ya)

OMG, give me a break! More rewarding? "I wasn't good enough the first time, so I lost at least a year of seniority, pay, etc. The next time, apparently I am good enough now and it's more rewarding now" ROTFLMAO!






I am just going to hold my breath till I get slammed for this one.

 

[kingairpilot]

OMG, give me a break! More rewarding? "I wasn't good enough the first time, so I lost at least a year of seniority, pay, etc. The next time, apparently I am good enough now and it's more rewarding now" ROTFLMAO!






I am just going to hold my breath till I get slammed for this one.

You Poor, Poor, Poorperson. I'm not slamming, I'm feeling sorry for YOU.


la

 

[Rez O. Lewshun]

OMG, give me a break! More rewarding? "I wasn't good enough the first time, so I lost at least a year of seniority, pay, etc. The next time, apparently I am good enough now and it's more rewarding now" ROTFLMAO!






I am just going to hold my breath till I get slammed for this one.

Mega.... now you know I repsect you... I gotta call you out on this one...

Not letting a setback effect ones attitude is pretty darn good. Knowing that many more before have been told no and gotten hired later shows perseverance and humilty.

Keeping ones goals insight and not letting expectations defines ones self or change thier attitude towards the company....

 

[RollinOnMy22sYo]

OMG, give me a break! More rewarding? "I wasn't good enough the first time, so I lost at least a year of seniority, pay, etc. The next time, apparently I am good enough now and it's more rewarding now" ROTFLMAO!


I am just going to hold my breath till I get slammed for this one.

Don't worry, lots of people who get turned down at SWA are good enough for "the new Yonited"

 

[JetFumes]

OMG, give me a break! More rewarding? "I wasn't good enough the first time, so I lost at least a year of seniority, pay, etc. The next time, apparently I am good enough now and it's more rewarding now" ROTFLMAO!






I am just going to hold my breath till I get slammed for this one.

I tend to agree. The whole SWA process is BS. They should call people they want to hire so that when you go in, you know you have a 75% chance or better of getting the job, not 25%. I also understand the desire to go back and try again, its still the best airline job out there (unless your a freight guy) right now, so why not try again.

 

[scoreboard]

OMG, give me a break!

Did you give up when SWA didn't hire you? Didn't think so.

 

[LearAv8r]

Did you give up when SWA didn't hire you? Didn't think so.

Nah....she is probably dropping eggs.

 

[Uniform Shop]

its still the best airline job out there (unless your a freight guy) right now

I won't disagree that it's the most "stable" airline job out there but I would disagree with your statement about it being the "best Airline job" out there.

The stability is great and the pay is excellent (in 2006) but there is much better flying (in my opinion) at some of the other airlines.

I'm not bashing SWA for all you SWA people out there because I know it's a great place to work but I wouldn't say it was the best airline job out there.

 

[RedDogC130]

They should call people they want to hire so that when you go in, you know you have a 75% chance or better of getting the job, not 25%.
.

How is a company to know who to hire until they meet you? Numbers on a paper is nothing. You need to meet the person to see what they are truly like or a glimpse into it. I for one like the process. I struck out the first time and am waiting on the second. Did it make me hate the company and the process....not at all. Did I try to improve on things I could to be more competative and did it make me take a better look at things I can control....YES. You can't just sit in your same position a year later and think you will get another shot. Change something. Doesn't have to be the company or equipment...just something...even your name....just kidding, that may work now that I think of it. Change or do something in your life that will make you a better person. Before someone goes yelling and screaming on this site, remember how small the industry is and don't let some words come back to haunt you. People can figure out who someone is on this site. Good flying!!

 

[skiandsurf]

When my dad goy hired at UAL in 1967, the airline of choice for others was Eastern, CAL, Pan Am, TWA. His buddies teased him for going with United. We know what happened to those airlines. Then in the 90s, when guys would go to SWA, its like they where giving up on the dream. Today, it seems that SWA is the dream. Will this cycle continue? Lets hope that Skybus is not the next dream.

 

[YourPilotFriend]

Don't be so sure that's a bad thing that you didn't get hired. SWA is not going to perform the way it was predicted last earnings report. Delta lead the way in cutting fares on the LCC routes and SWA has matched. If those fares don't come back up by the first half of 2007 SWA may be reporting losses. If capacity drops, it will be major losses.

 

[khsgt]

I got the "thanks for playing" letter the first time around...I'm hopeful that next spring goes a little better

Go SWA!

 

[JetFumes]

How is a company to know who to hire until they meet you? Numbers on a paper is nothing. You need to meet the person to see what they are truly like or a glimpse into it. I for one like the process. I struck out the first time and am waiting on the second. Did it make me hate the company and the process....not at all. Did I try to improve on things I could to be more competative and did it make me take a better look at things I can control....YES. You can't just sit in your same position a year later and think you will get another shot. Change something. Doesn't have to be the company or equipment...just something...even your name....just kidding, that may work now that I think of it. Change or do something in your life that will make you a better person. Before someone goes yelling and screaming on this site, remember how small the industry is and don't let some words come back to haunt you. People can figure out who someone is on this site. Good flying!!

Just look at the numbers that get hired vs. the number that don't the first time. Then look at the number of first time success stories at COntinental or JetBlue or FedEx as a percentage of total interviewees. Much better chances are to be had elsewhere the first time vs SWA. Why is that? I've met some class acts that didn't get hired the first time and some "not-so-great" people that did. Why is that? Simple, the system is flawed. However, I didn't get hired at SWA, so in that case, the system worked

 

[hyperboy]

stay strong and focused

I had all my references called. In fact I wrote Herb K. back in 1998 right as I started my flying career and told him SWA was where I wanted to be. He wrote me back. Yes I had herbs letters with me on interview day.

Yes, I got the letter but SWA remains my dream. Nobody says that your dreams are going to be a cake walk. You have to stay motivated and focused on what your dream is, everybody has different dreams, and that's OK. I don't feel hate SWA since that I did not make it the first time. I would be ignorant to think that I should get hired considering the company I interviewed with that day. Sure it hurt not to get the call but but that should not be the end if flying at SWA is your dream like mine.

Ever heard of Jimmy Valvano...that should be motivation enough. What a speech?! I know where I want to be and their are others out there as well. Don't give up!

Would you tell your child to give up on his/her dreams? No, you would support them and give them advice that will help them accomplish their dreams. That is the reason for this post.

 

[scoreboard]

Simple, the system is flawed.

Complete BS and you know it.

We have a system, it works great.

It allows a mass of folks WHO MEET the minimums an OPPORTUNITY to interview. What YOU do with that interview is up to you (to include background, references, experience, prep, etc). To my knowledge you won't find that anywhere else.

You don't want to be called for an interview unless you have a 100% chance? Simple, apply elsewhere. And good luck.

 

[Dude]

The flaw is using people to hire people. But I'm not sure what alternative we have. Our system of interviewing is not perfect, by far, but I'll be damned if anyone else does it better and has had the success at hiring such depth and diversity into their cockpits as SWA.

I've flown with ex-astronauts, ex-Thunderbirds, ex-college dropouts, ex-attorneys, ex-freight dogs, ex-test pilots, ex-commuter dudes, ex-corporate dudes, ex-tanker dudes, ex-fighter dudes, and a couple of current buttholes. There is a trend here. Ex would be the operative word. There is a distinct difference between desperation and desire. Southwest wants people that desire to be a member of the Southwest family. Flying is such a small part of the collective equation. I agree that it is difficult to spend $8000.00 to buy a type without any guarantee but I paid a lot more for my other certificates and I sleep very well at night with the decision I made. It was an investment and therefore, the cost of doing business.

The personality portion is the hard one. Any schmuck can fly an approach and not kill anyone. You have only three 45 minute interviews and during those and your LOI you have to show those folks who you really are. It doesn't matter if your prepped or not or if your an ace or a good bull$hitter. What matters is what they read between the lines and in between stories. They are pros and can tell who fits and who doesn't. Sadly, a large number of those turned down shouldn't have been; but the system is run by imperfect people who misread an answer, didn't listen attentively, or are having a bad day. On the whole, the systems is very effective and I am glad we have it. The test is in our performance as an airline, in which the pilot contribute. It appears we pass.

 

[Speedbird34]

HYPERBOY.. You will be smilin next year! I also did not get hired. Did not impress the recruiters enough and very impressive group of pilots also trying to get the job tough calls for the recruiters to make and their system really does hire a diverse mix. All we can do is build more expereince and walk the walk not just talk the talk. lets try to get involved in mentoring in our present companies, maybe become check airmen. Surely we shall build more PIC and then maybe even get involve in the community you live in. Help people outside flying while there is a limit how much you can shine as a pilot. As a human being doing good deeds there is no limit to how much goodness you can deal. That is very impressive and SWA wants you to impress them and I hope to use my 1+ years waiting for another interveiw improving myself in all areas so that when I walk out of my next interveiw the fellows would say I am impressed by the progress, No let them say I am blown off my feet by this Pilot. Goodluck and keep your chin up as you say something that great is worth fighting for and waiting for.

 

[LJDRVR]

Southwest was always my dream airline, from 1998 onward, it's the one place I really wanted to work. My logbook show something in the neighborhood of 20+ hours with Herb in the back of my Learjet. I finally got the opportunity to interview in August, and a funny thing happened: I didn't get the job. More than likely I got nervous and messed up the LOI. (Interestingly enough, I've had many no-s__t IFE's for real, and always handled them very well. Some days the bear eats you.

Here's my advice to all you SW hopefuls: take it very seriously and prepare constantly. I had been updating for almost five years when they called, and it caught me off guard. I briefly considered doing some prep, but decided I didn't want to appear too canned. BIG mistake. DO THE PREP. You will get insights into what the recruiters are really wanting to know when they ask a specific question. Thus armed, you'll be able show them the "real you" even better. Again, DO THE PREP!

Here's the thing, whoever said one door closes and another opens was correct. The next day after I got the letter, a different major airline called me for an interview. This time I got serious, did two different preps and I got hired.

Best of luck to all my SWA brothers and sisters, but when my year comes up, I'm hoping to be in the schoolhouse, transitioning from the 737 to the 757.

 

[737ski]

Dude,
You said it better than anyone could. I planned to go negative on this thread until I read your response and couldn't agree more, I, too, have flown with or known alot of ex's, would've/should've/could've...

Don't we all live our lives that way? Take a risk, live life, take that risk for the 3rd, 4th or 5th times! If at first you don't succeed, try, try again... Isn't that the American way? Keep the faith & pursue your dream...

Ski

 

[LearDriver]

I interviewed with SW almost 2.5 years ago with the type, and with references called. I felt like all went well, but in the end received the dreaded letter. That was my first interview, but hopefully not my last.

I have kept everything updated frequently since, but I am slightly concerned since I have not heard a peep out of them since then. I keep checking to make sure that I haven't missed anything on the application, and have had others proof it for me. I'm sure that others have waited longer than this for a second chance, but I can't help wondering if this is the normal waiting period in the current hiring market or not. It just seems like a long time to me. Good luck to all the hopeful.

 

[BagelBaker]

The flaw is using people to hire people. But I'm not sure what alternative we have. Our system of interviewing is not perfect, by far, but I'll be danged if anyone else does it better and has had the success at hiring such depth and diversity into their cockpits as SWA.

I've flown with ex-astronauts, ex-Thunderbirds, ex-college dropouts, ex-attorneys, ex-freight dogs, ex-test pilots, ex-commuter dudes, ex-corporate dudes, ex-tanker dudes, ex-fighter dudes, and a couple of current buttholes. There is a trend here. Ex would be the operative word. There is a distinct difference between desperation and desire. Southwest wants people that desire to be a member of the Southwest family. Flying is such a small part of the collective equation. I agree that it is difficult to spend $8000.00 to buy a type without any guarantee but I paid a lot more for my other certificates and I sleep very well at night with the decision I made. It was an investment and therefore, the cost of doing business.

The personality portion is the hard one. Any schmuck can fly an approach and not kill anyone. You have only three 45 minute interviews and during those and your LOI you have to show those folks who you really are. It doesn't matter if your prepped or not or if your an ace or a good bull$hitter. What matters is what they read between the lines and in between stories. They are pros and can tell who fits and who doesn't. Sadly, a large number of those turned down shouldn't have been; but the system is run by imperfect people who misread an answer, didn't listen attentively, or are having a bad day. On the whole, the systems is very effective and I am glad we have it. The test is in our performance as an airline, in which the pilot contribute. It appears we pass.

Excellent post...

Hopefully gonna add "Ex-Bagel Baker" to that list soon!

Hyperboy, I'm pulling for you for next year, man.

 

[JetFumes]

Complete BS and you know it.

We have a system, it works great.

It allows a mass of folks WHO MEET the minimums an OPPORTUNITY to interview. What YOU do with that interview is up to you (to include background, references, experience, prep, etc). To my knowledge you won't find that anywhere else.

You don't want to be called for an interview unless you have a 100% chance? Simple, apply elsewhere. And good luck.

NO, I don't. First off, when I say that there are class acts that didn't make it, do you really think these guys didn't take it seriously, and when I say that there are some real screw-ups who did, do you think I didn't know who I was talking about.

Here's the flaw in the system as I see it.( Keep in mind, SWA isn't the only place that does it this way) SWA bases their decisions on a personality style, lets get to know you interview. There is no sim ride, no real techincal questions asked, or a written test given. So if you have two equally qualified individuals who both have perfect resumes and backgrounds, why does one get hired and one not? Its based on the interviewers brief "perception" of their personalities. Thats too shallow of an analysis, in my opinion. And I only base it on the good people I know who got turned down. On the flip side, SWA has hired some great people as well, and I'm glad they got on there, they deserve it.

 

[SWAdude]

NO, I don't. First off, when I say that there are class acts that didn't make it, do you really think these guys didn't take it seriously, and when I say that there are some real screw-ups who did, do you think I didn't know who I was talking about.

Here's the flaw in the system as I see it.( Keep in mind, SWA isn't the only place that does it this way) SWA bases their decisions on a personality style, lets get to know you interview. There is no sim ride, no real techincal questions asked, or a written test given. So if you have two equally qualified individuals who both have perfect resumes and backgrounds, why does one get hired and one not? Its based on the interviewers brief "perception" of their personalities. Thats too shallow of an analysis, in my opinion. And I only base it on the good people I know who got turned down. On the flip side, SWA has hired some great people as well, and I'm glad they got on there, they deserve it.

The major flaw I see in your statement (there are a few others) is that you assume since you think they were great people that SWA would see them as good employees.

You never know how well your friends actually interviewed.

 

[Mooseflyer]

Its based on the interviewers brief "perception" of their personalities. Thats too shallow of an analysis, in my opinion. And I only base it on the good people I know who got turned down.

Bold text above added by me.

I agree, it is too shallow. Which is why some airlines have a program in place to combat the "brief perception". Some call it the sponsor, some call it the silver bullet, some call it the meet&greet, some call it the letter of recommendation. I think it's an excellent idea - after all, pilots don't fly with HR interviewers, they fly with other pilots. But companies get slammed (by us) for having such a program. Take FedEx for example - all the time on this board you hear folks saying it's too much of a "good 'ole boys club".

I, for one, would much rather fly with guys recommended by my peers than with someone hired after a 30 minute interview. Perhaps the interviewee told good stories, or they memorized the company mission statement, or they looked snappy in their dark blue suit, whatever. I couldn't give a rats a$$ about any of that if I have to sit next to some $hitbag for days on end. Of course, all that goes out the window when one $hitbag already on the property recommends other $hitbags!

 

[canyonblue]

We have many pilots here, myself included, who have been pissed off after one of their friends got the letter. I know of a few individuals that got the letter and I was more than a little pissed, I went to talk to the CP about it. Do the interviewers screw up? In my experience with the guys I knew that were turned down, YES! I have flown with a couple of guys who did the interviews, and always asked a million questions about our process. The bottom line, they would like to hire every pilot that comes in. Well they obviously do not and this is where the human factor plays in, for better or worse. He did confirm the story about the cell phone guy, and also about the guy who dropped the F word about 109 times between the 3 interviewers. Two of the guys I know who got the letter are waiting on their year, I'm not sure about the other. My one friend said he wished that he did the Prep, as it may of made a difference.

So what is the reason to try again in a year? Because you know that they screwed up and missed a great employee, and you will give them another shot at hiring you.

Please try again if you really want to work for SWA, we really need those positive attitudes.

 

[capt. megadeth]

Did you give up when SWA didn't hire you? Didn't think so.

Uh....actually I did.

 

[SWAdude]

We have many pilots here, myself included, who have been pissed off after one of their friends got the letter. I know of a few individuals that got the letter and I was more than a little pissed, I went to talk to the CP about it. Do the interviewers screw up? In my experience with the guys I knew that were turned down, YES! I have flown with a couple of guys who did the interviews, and always asked a million questions about our process. The bottom line, they would like to hire every pilot that comes in. Well they obviously do not and this is where the human factor plays in, for better or worse. He did confirm the story about the cell phone guy, and also about the guy who dropped the F word about 109 times between the 3 interviewers. Two of the guys I know who got the letter are waiting on their year, I'm not sure about the other. My one friend said he wished that he did the Prep, as it may of made a difference.

So what is the reason to try again in a year? Because you know that they screwed up and missed a great employee, and you will give them another shot at hiring you.

Please try again if you really want to work for SWA, we really need those positive attitudes.

Well said. Most all of us have had "great" people interviewed and turned down. I have no doubt that I interviewed many "great" people that I didn't recommend for hire. I truly wish that I could have approved of everyone but the fact of the matter is that not all people are good for SWA. And SWA is what mine and every employees family depends on. Some "great" people just don't interview well. And some "great" people are recommended by some not so "great" people. This is only to mean maybe these weren't such "great" people to begin with.

We have forty five minutes to come to a decision about an individual. As for testing and the such. My experience has always been, you can teach someone how to fly but you can't change their attitude. If they have problems with their skill, we find that in training and take care of it there. Instead of an hour sim ride and a few hours of timed testing, we give them six weeks to prove that they are adequate. After that a year on the line. In the 12 years I have been here I have only heard a story or two about someone not being able to do the job. A few others for attitude problems. This company will bend over backwards to help you through.

This system works as good as you could hope for any system to work. We get "great" people to work with. Its not 100% by any means. We have plenty that slip through the cracks. But its what works for us.

Good luck to all.

 

[scoreboard]

Thats too shallow of an analysis, in my opinion. .

We agree to disagree on symantics, you say it is flawed, I will agree it is not perfect, but neither is it flawed. Oh, and what system at what company is perfect? It works for SWA. It is what it is.