Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

WTF?: Southwest RJ's

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Geneology

The 737-100 came first, and was upgraded to the -200 almost immediately. Darn few -100's sold.

Then came the classics: the -300 came first, bigger jet, bigger engines, etc. Then the stretch model, the -400. Then the bright idea of a smaller version, compatible with the -200 in terms of size, and lighter/more fuel efficient than the -300, but same basic technology. Thus the -500. (All of the classics could have round dials, as SWA jets do, or the 4-tube EFIS, as many other airlines have.)

Then came the NG's, and they made the numbers increase with size: -600, -700, and -800 going from "small" to "standard" to "x-large." The -600 is the NG successor to the -500, and they're roughly the same size (except wingspan), just as the -700 is to the -300, and the -800 to the -400.

For SWA, the smaller jets are sort of a "gotcha" waiting to happen -- you sell 137 seats, and a -500 shows up at the gate, and you have an immediate oversell. Ooops!

Still, a -600 would be fun to fly -- that much power in a light airframe with all the NG bells & whistles! If only they would land like the -200 does (by far the best touchdowns of all the varients we fly)!

Snoopy
 

Latest resources

Back
Top