Hulk Hogan
XJ
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Posts
- 308
I agree that the best interest of the union as a whole has to be considered when making such a decision as DW is making with XJ. However, one could argue that a truly good leader would consider minimizing the gains of one group in order to minimize the loss of another. Another quality of a good leader could be to put personal gain aside while representing the best interest of ALL (DW desire to be reelected). I can't say that DW has shown either of these two qualities in relation to XJ. Maybe the bigest problem with ALPA is that they are not in tune with what the group really wants. I think this argument can be made at the MEC level as well. (Look at the issue with McClain being recalled yet the TA he worked on being ratified by the pilot group.) This whole Comapss issue reaks of incompetence on behalf of the union as well. Why the heck didn't they do one of their little polls to figure out ahead of time that few NWA furloughs would actually take a ppsition at Compass (heck they did that f-ing fatigue poll why couldn't they do this poll). Instead they create the oportunity for another airline (represented by ALPA) to compete against two other airlines (both represented by ALPA and competing against each other) for flying these airplanes. I would think a one time offer to NWA furloughs to work at XJ and 9E in these airplanes (granted not displacing a current employee of XJ or 9E) could have been a better solution than creating the oportunity for another airline to compete. I can't say I have any solutions....but then again I am not being paid to or representing that I do either. I believe DW's actions to be motivated by personal gain rather than by the best interest of our union. My opinion is based on the fact that I have to read about the future of my airline in the newspaper rather than in corespondence addressed to me. DW, if you need attention that badly, get a f-ing dog.