Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Win for Jetblue pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I tried to skim through this thread to figure out a dollar amount you were suing for. What percentage or dollar amount are the airbus pilots expecting? Is there some sort of lump sum retro and then raise going forward? All I've seen so far is that bus pilots want the same percentage raise as the 190 pilots.

Should be big $$$ but in the end it will be pennies on the dollar
 
It is my under standing that ALL 3A pilots under contract going forward get the bump.. That means A320 and E190 get the 26.7%. You were not under contract before 2007. Your bitching about Airbus pilots vs E190 when your beef is really you were hired to late. The dividing line is NOT Airbus pilot v E190 pilots it is pre 2007 hire and post 2007 hire. There are 1100 pilots hired AFTER 2007 and they are all NOT E190 pilots.

My head hurts just reading this. What a frigging mess.
 
Although not part of 3A what I like about the decision is that it calls into question JB Legal's judgement on what is and/or is not valid in the PEA.

So, when they tell us that "Yes, you have seniority list integration protections provided for under McCaskill-Bond" we can now point out how very wrong they were about 3A and that no one should take their word for it.

Just an example. I think this can severly cripple the credibility of their propaganda press releases, if it is played correctly.
 
Although not part of 3A what I like about the decision is that it calls into question JB Legal's judgement on what is and/or is not valid in the PEA.

So, when they tell us that "Yes, you have seniority list integration protections provided for under McCaskill-Bond" we can now point out how very wrong they were about 3A and that no one should take their word for it.

Just an example. I think this can severly cripple the credibility of their propaganda press releases, if it is played correctly.

This post should be read by all the no voters/BoB types.

Best post of the year in my view.
 
From the SEC 8-K filing on May 28, 2013.
>>>

Item 7.01. Regulation FD.


As previously disclosed in our periodic filings, a group of current and former pilots commenced arbitration in a base pay dispute related to compensation under their Pilot Employment Agreements (PEA). The arbitrator issued his decision yesterday, on May 28, 2013, denying the claims from 2009, but determining that the 2007 pay adjustments for certain pilots triggered a provision of the PEA under his interpretation of the agreement. The Company is evaluating the decision and next steps.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top