Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Will DAL paycut's effect Comair?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rattler
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 6

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

rattler

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
242
Just curious, but is there any intention by managment to try to ask for concessions at Comair? With Comair being the highest paid operator of small jets, it would seem they might try. If so I hope the Comair guys hold tough, and hang on to what they worked so hard for just a few short years ago. With my airline in contract negotiations, we have set expectations to exceed the Comair pay by large margins. However it is tough to negotiate large pay increases when others are taking concessions. Wish us all luck.
 
In my humble opinion, DAL Mainline paycuts will probably adversely affect ASA/CMR pilots in so far as it will probably lead to a shift in flying back to mainline.
 
Airline management mostly cares about two things. CASM and RASM. Cost per Available Seat Mile and Revenue per Available Seat Mile. If Regionals pay increases and "Major Airline" pay decreases, I'm sure there is a point at which it is more profitable to have the flying done by the major. However, Im sure the pilot group as a whole would rather see Majors perform a majority of the flying, unless you plan on retiring at a regional.

With all the pay cuts at majors lately, I have heard some talk lately about RJ's loosing their appeal. I wouldn't be surprised if several years from now some management guru gets a bonus for replacing three RJs with one B737/A320, and RJs are placed back into their initial role of developing routes for Majors. But then again, this industry is predictably unpredictable.
 
Don't know if that is correct. Management is in love with RJs, they can't get enough. Our CASMs at AA are very low, and AE is growing like a plague.

AA
 
Actually, the question should be: how could concessions AFFECT Comair?

-The Grammar Police Are Here!-
 
rattler said:
Just curious, but is there any intention by managment to try to ask for concessions at Comair? With Comair being the highest paid operator of small jets, it would seem they might try. If so I hope the Comair guys hold tough, and hang on to what they worked so hard for just a few short years ago. With my airline in contract negotiations, we have set expectations to exceed the Comair pay by large margins. However it is tough to negotiate large pay increases when others are taking concessions. Wish us all luck.
Rattler,

I don't pretend to know management's "intentions" but common sense indicates that having asked before, they will ask again. This time the "asking" is quite likely to be more of a demand.

The Comair pilots' response to the previous asking for concessions was that negotiations/concessions were "premature". That resulted in the company (Delta) allocating growth aircraft to its other subsidiary and to its subcontractors. The carrot was "growth", the stick was stagnation punishment.

The Delta pilots have done everything in their power to "hold on" to their contract, but reality is that there are limits to what any pilot groups can do. Delta is now in financial trouble. As losses continue to mount and other competing airlines, through bankruptcy, near bankruptcy, negotiated or imposed new "agreements", etc., have continued to lower their costs, the differential between Delta's compensation package and that of its competitors has continued to increase. While the Delta pilots' pay is not the cause of Delta's troubles, the fact remains that the gap between a Delta pilots' compensation and the compensation levels at Delta's competitors has become so great that something has to give.

No one knows at this point what will happen at Delta, but whatever does, you can be certain it will affect Delta's subsidiaries and that includes Comair.

Apart from Delta mainline, and although Comair is profitable (according to Delta), in terms of pilot compensation Comair pilots have a problem that is quite similar to the problem of the Delta pilots. Since the last time the company asked Comair pilots for concessions, many airlines have signed new agreements. Comair compensation was not #1 originally, but other concessionary agreements (most unnecessary) have definitely made it so. Without exception, regional and mainline alike, are now flying similar equipment to Comair for far less money. We have been undercut at every opportunity for a variety of alleged "reasons".

The bottom line is that our current compensation package is substantially better than other airlines of our type. It is better than the new USAirways half-breed (MAA), and the latest Jet Blue announcement brings their 100-seat airplane in much below our 70-seat airplane. NW pilots are currently trying to capture 70-seat flying. To do it, they will have to accept rates that will wind up lower than Comair's. The Delta pilots are quite likely to do the same.

Any Comair pilot that believes the company will not seek concessions in the future is in for a surprise. It's coming.

Given what has been done at AAA, ARW, Mesa, Mesaba, MAA, CHQ and JBlue, our ability to "hold the line" at Comair is under ever increasing pressure. In my opinion, that pressure will only increase in the future. Where we were once ranked #2 or 3 in the compensation package game, we are now leagues ahead of everyone else. In terms of work rules, we are now better than United, let alone other regionals. In the next round when UAL, AA, DL and NWA loose their "A" plans, it will make our puny "B" plan and 401K look like grand theft.

As for those airlines currently in negotiations, about all I can do is wish you luck. However, common sense tells me that your aspirations to do better than Comair have been washed down the drain by the contracts that your union and others have seen fit to sign at competing carriers.

Ironically, the biggest "hit" so far to our pay rates does not come from other regionals, it comes from two so-called major airlines. USAirways pilots have agreed to fly the EMB-170/175 (a 76-seat aircraft) for "Eagle rates", but they have also agreed to give up their longevity. That means they will all start at MAA with 1st year pay of $58+ per hour. We do not have any 1st yr captains in the CRJ 70. With a few exceptions our CRJ 70 captains have 10 or more yrs. seniority. That makes our (10-yr) rate of $88+ $30 per hr higher than USAirways. Our top rate is $55 per hour higher; nearly double. Over at JB, they will fly the EMB-190 with 100-seats for $72 hr 1st yr. - $86 hr 12th yr. Again we have the problem of longevity. JB pilots will nearly all be at 1st yr pay. Since their airline is only 5 yrs old, none will be at 5th yr pay since all those guys fly the Bus. That leaves us paying $16 - $41 hr more for a 70-seat airplane than JB will earn in a 100-seat airplane. When NW and DL decide to match those rates to get the flying, where do you think that will leave Comair? Answer = Up the creek without the proverbial paddle. I don't mean to be a purveyor of doom and gloom, but the handwriting is on the wall.

If this trend of "majors" flying for nothing to keep flying from regionals or to get more flying for themselves continues, regional pilots are going to have to PFF (pay for flying) just to keep their jobs. It ain't pretty. They (the majors) couldn't get our airplanes with the Scope clauses, so now they're going to take them with their low-ball pay. Meanwhile they will no doubt continue to tell us that our "cheap labor" is the cause of their downfall. Of course we could counter this by offering to fly the AirBi and the 737's for 90 bucks an hour, but that wouldn't be "cricket" would it? We live in interesting times.

That was a pretty long-winded diatribe to answer a question that could have been answered with one word, i.e., YES. Sorry about that; we all get our turn to rant.

I'm sure we'll try to hold on as long as we can at Comair. Just the same it would be prudent to plan for a hit and a big one.
 
I sure hope the DAL pilot group does not cave in to this insanity without a hard and long battle, which is most likely what is going to happen. The Delta pilots have fought too hard to set the bar this high, expect a hard fight till the end.

Mainline flying must be done using mainline equipment and mainline pilots, this outsourcing of what were once profitable routes for Delta and replacing them with RJ's must stop if DAL is to get back to where they once were. Grinney needs to put an end to this (which hopefully will happen soon), CMR and ASA are not helping or "feeding" DAL, they are hurting them in more ways than one.

Keep replacing MD, 73, and 75 routes and putting RJ's in place will not get the job done, bottom line. Some of Delta's most profitable routes that were full at one point in time are now being flown by RJ's, just a tad mind boggling to say the least.

Delta flying must be done using Delta aircraft and Delta pilots, no way around this if Delta will once again be successful.


3 5 0
 
OK, that's easy enough. Comair, ASA, pilots can just resign. That will give all of their planes, which already belong to Delta, back to Delta. Then the Delta pilots can fly those routes in Delta planes.

That should keep all the important folks happy. It will also create more jobs at the major and the Comair and ASA pilots will be able to apply for them, if they can qualify to fly RJs and meet the mainline's higher standards.
 
Last edited:
Surplus,

I'm picking up on your sarcasm!

You're killing me! :)
 
350,

Not trying to flame here, but do you not work for Mesa?

This company has set the bar very low, has tried to bust mainline flying at AWA using 90 seat jets (note, I did not call it an RJ). It seems your comany is doing the exact same thing you are telling the DAL boys not give up on?

If I am wrong about where you work, please accept my aplogy. If I am right, could you please explain.

AA
 
350DRIVER said:
Mainline flying must be done using mainline equipment and mainline pilots,

Delta flying must be done using Delta aircraft and Delta pilots, no way around this if Delta will once again be successful.

3 5 0
Wonderful sentiment, but please tell me what defines mainline flying? Route length does not seem to. City size sure doesn't seem to. Does not Delta fly routes that used to be operated by ASA/Comair/ et. al.? Should these carriers demand "their" flying back? Does the company have the right to change the capacity on a route if the market dictates? Just because an RJ is full on a route does not mean a 737 could operate it profitably. If demand on a route declines for what ever reason, is it not smarter to put a smaller aircraft on it, keep it open, eek out what little margin you can and wait for better times, or close it all together?

Of course, if you wanted to bring all of the RJ's under the mainline banner, you might have something. Would they still be RJ's then, or mainline equipment?
 
AA,

I am not a Mesa pilot, although I do have quite a few friends over there but I am not and have never been a Mesa Airlines employee. This thread has nothing to do with Mesa and everything to do with the current shape of Delta and what it is going to take to get DAL back to where they once were not too long ago. I was merely offering my personal opinion and what I think it is going to take to return Delta to the days of being "profitable" and "successful". It is easy to place blame on the DAL pilots but that is a bad excuse since even with a 30-40% CUT DAL is still going to be loosing money, this is far greater than a "pay" or "pilot" issue.

Wonderful sentiment, but please tell me what defines mainline flying? Route length does not seem to.
Birddog,

I am unsure how one could define "mainline flying" other than the profitable routes that usually went out 90-95% full that were once serviced by Delta MD's, 73's, 75's, that are currently (present day) being flown by RJ's. The problem is that if you take a look at these routes they were extremely profitable for Delta and if they are to turn this ship around that flying needs to come back to mainline. If you keep pulling mainline equipment and replacing the profitable routes with RJ's then you can obviously see what is going to happen.


Just because an RJ is full on a route does not mean a 737 could operate it profitably. If demand on a route declines for what ever reason, is it not smarter to put a smaller aircraft on it, keep it open, eek out what little margin you can and wait for better times, or close it all together?

I agree and never argued that point. . I was simply pointing out that many of the routes that were going out full on a 73 have been replaced in favor of the RJ's. What good is this doing for Delta?. Obviously if you cannot push back with a full mainline aircraft then by all means replace it with RJ service but if you take a look at the loads on some of these routes you would see that this really isn't the case.

Should be interesting times ahead for sure but if DAL does not do something a long these lines then it will continue to be a long and bumpy ride.

change is going to have to occur if they are to right this ship.

3 5 0
 
350,

I don't want to sound like a "suit" but I think it is safe to say that the Company is trying hard to operate at a profit.

There are scope restrictions that limit the company's use of RJs. There are NO restrictions that limit the company's deployment of "mainline" equipment. Thus the company can replace any RJ on any route at any time.

If they are NOT doing that it has to be because management believes that its decision as to which aircraft should be deployed where is the right decision. Nothing at all forces the company to operate even one RJ. Their choice is made for economic reasons, not to please or annoy pilots.

Pilots, whether mainline or regional, might not agree with management's choice of aircraft on a particular route. Candidly that is irrelevant. The company does not exist for the purpose of providing employment for pilots. It exists to make a profit for the investors. Right now, the only part of the company's operations that are profitable, as a whole, are its regional airline operations (according to the company). Either they are lying about this and deliberately trying to bankrupt the company or they are telling the truth.

I don't know the answer but I respectfully submit that neither does any other pilot. We all have a surplus (no pun intended) of opinions. None of us knows the true facts.

Management hasn't done a very good job of managing the legacy carriers. However, at no time in aviation history that I can recall has any group of pilots ever run a successful airline. If I'm right,we are not really in a position to tell management how best it should be done.

In my opinion, pilots whether mainline or regional should NOT have the power to determine what aircraft a company should deploy, how many it should deploy or where it should deploy them. That's a "management right" and I think it should so remain. All these artificial contractual restrictions that usurp this basic management right have done much more to harm the respective airlines than help the associated pilot groups. More of the same will not make things better for anyone.

I think Delta will ultimately survive this crisis but it will not do it on the basis of how many RJs it does or does not operate. The RJ is not the problem. Pilot wages are not the problem. Those are both the "excuses". Market conditions and an outdated business plan are the problem.
 
350DRIVER said:
AA,

I am unsure how one could define "mainline flying" other than the profitable routes that usually went out 90-95% full that were once serviced by Delta MD's, 73's, 75's, that are currently (present day) being flown by RJ's. The problem is that if you take a look at these routes they were extremely profitable for Delta and if they are to turn this ship around that flying needs to come back to mainline. If you keep pulling mainline equipment and replacing the profitable routes with RJ's then you can obviously see what is going to happen.


3 5 0
Please name some of these "profitable" routes for us....particularly the ones that had 90-95% loads. And since you are such an expert, please cite the yields on this route too.

I get the feeling you are just making these "profitable" routes up, but feel free to prove me wrong and cite some real numbers.
 
Northwest to buy and fly 70 seaters

American's pilot union wins 400 seniority positions at American Eagle through federal abitration

UsAir pilots flying RJ's.

Airline analysts predict Delta to shrink to half it's size by 2015
I don't think it would take much figuring out to realize that BK filing by Delta mainline would benifit the company and the mainline union.

One, they would get to undo the contracts at asa and comair, alowing them to get those concessions from the pilots at comair and asa, without having to ask nice.

Two, the mainline pilot union would be able to get RJDC off their backs and open up flow backs into comair and asa...if they even exist in their present form in the future. I think the writing is on the wall, mainline likes their RJ-85's and CRJ's...it's just a matter of who is going to be flying them in the future.
 
surplus1 said:
350,

I think Delta will ultimately survive this crisis but it will not do it on the basis of how many RJs it does or does not operate. The RJ is not the problem. Pilot wages are not the problem. Those are both the "excuses". Market conditions and an outdated business plan are the problem.

WOW! Someone who understands!!
 
Surplus,

Sometimes management makes mistakes that are not in the best interest of a company, I believe you have a perfect example here. . . Take a look at the parked MD-11's for example that are sitting in the graveyard, not very smart and these could have been used flying back and forth over to the sandbox, etc. Also take a look at how much they are paying daily and weekly to have these airplanes sitting idle. Bad choices and bad gambles have been causing more problems than one could have first thought possible.

Pilots, whether mainline or regional, might not agree with management's choice of aircraft on a particular route. Candidly that is irrelevant. The company does not exist for the purpose of providing employment for pilots. It exists to make a profit for the investors. Right now, the only part of the company's operations that are profitable, as a whole, are its regional airline operations (according to the company). Either they are lying about this and deliberately trying to bankrupt the company or they are telling the truth.

It is not irrelevant at all since Delta's future is on the line and these choices have been doing damage I am very happy for you at Comair and those at ASA but should DAL go bye bye then the dominos are going to follow and fall rather quickly. I don't think anyone is cooking the books, lying, etc, but your success is not helping DAL. So you ask what is the fix? Your guess is as good as mine but surely changes are going to be made if this ship is to stop from sinking.


I don't know the answer but I respectfully submit that neither does any other pilot. We all have a surplus (no pun intended) of opinions. None of us knows the true facts.

The answer is rather simple, make the necessary changes in the business plan and get back to what made Delta so successful in the first place. Easier said than done but it is possible. Times are different and competition is fierce, somehow management is going to have to find the answer(s) to compete with the JB's and AirTran's of the industry.


Market conditions and an outdated business plan are the problem

I agree to a certain degree.... Mainline flying still needs to be done using mainline equipment and mainline pilots. Delta will not make it if they replace all the profitable routes with RJ's no matter how much less it can be flown for.


Please name some of these "profitable" routes for us....particularly the ones that had 90-95% loads. And since you are such an expert, please cite the yields on this route too.
I am an "expert" now? Hmmm... I don't recall ever proclaiming to be one but I do appreciate the kind words. I will have to re-read my previous posts to see where I signed off on my "opinions" as "expert" advice. . . I think it is clear that this has occurred all across the board, just take a look at some of the Delta hubs and compare the route structure now (present day ) to pre-911, you will see the changes. . . I am not really advocating anything here, merely just personal opinion coming from a former Delta Airlines employee (HOU) in a past lifetime... Is this the complete solution to the problem, absolutely not but if Delta is to live then the changes are going to have to occur whether you like it or not.

I am happy that Comair and ASA continue to grow, add equipment, routes, etc, etc, but it really is not doing much for Delta's current predicament present day is it?

I get the feeling you are just making these "profitable" routes up, but feel free to prove me wrong and cite some real numbers.

Prove you wrong? I do appreciate the offer and will respectfully decline the invitation to do so since it is not my "goal" or interest to do so. If you follow the major board then you would have been following the General's posts and a few others that actually showed the pairings of former Delta routes that are now being flown using regional jets.


Delta is in for a long battle but I don't think the bleeding will cause death in the end...


time shall tell...


3 5 0
 
350DRIVER said:
Surplus,

If you follow the major board then you would have been following the General's posts and a few others that actually showed the pairings of former Delta routes that are now being flown using regional jets.
Although you have not claimed to be an "expert" yourself, you apparently think that General Lee is. I respectfully submit that opinion is also open to question.

While the General may have indicated accurately a list of routes once flown by "mainline aircraft" that has nothing whatever to do with how much money the Company may have made or how much it has lost because of these changes in aircraft deployment. The General's opinions are not supported by the balance sheet. In fact his segment/division of the operation is hemorraging money while the segment he dislikes is making money. His theory does not compute.

In fact the only thing the General's statements "prove" is that he is partisan to what he considers the best interests of the Delta pilots, which unfortunately do not necessarily coincide with the best interests of Delta Air Lines. His "logic" often reminds me of the Republican political rhetoric, i.e., he has an ideology and an agenda, as long as his ideology/agenda wins the day he could care less what happens to the country (Delta). The attitude should come as no surprise given that most Delta pilots are know to be Republicans.

I don't share that view. Instead I believe that the Company must be free to select the right aircraft for the right market, regardless of whether its a 50-seat RJ or a Boeing 777. I don't think that selection should be determined by the General or any other Delta pilot. I also don't think it should be determined by any Comair pilot. The Delta pilot union and its parent union ALPA have been and remain on an anti-RJ campaign for years. Their objective has nothing to do with what is best for the Company and everything to do with what they think is best for Delta pilots. That is not the reason why Delta is in trouble, but it is definitely one of the reasons.

I agree completely that ASA and Comair, regardless of their profitability, cannot "save Delta" but I also know that the elimination of RJs and their replacement with 1/2 empty 737s will not save Delta either. Neither will anything else that the Air Line Pilots Association has proposed to date. The time may have come for the Delta pilots to accept the reality that their own survival is predicated on the survival of the Company as a whole.

It should be noted that I do NOT see the Delta pilots as objecting to the deployment of the so-called "regional jets". What they are objecting to is the fact that they are not sitting in the cockpits of those jets, nothing else. Attempts to make this appear or come across as an interst in the Company's welfare is totally transparent. They are interested in their own survival and they don't care if that results in the loss of survival for someone else.

Since I am not a Delta pilot, the interests of Delta pilots are not my number one priority. I would prefer to bet the farm on the survival of the Company, which in turn will ultimately equate to my survival. I'm quite willing to accept that ultimately a number of RJ routes will revert to "mainline equipment", whatever that is.

The bottom line is that there is and there should not be any "mainline equipment" or any "regional equipment". The Company owns ALL of these aircraft; one Company, not three. That company is Delta Air Lines and its management must be allowed to use these aircraft in whatever way it determines to be best. Management did not create the fence that divides Delta pilots from ASA/CMR pilots. ALPA and the Delta pilots did that. The pilots on both sides of the artificial "fence" can rant and rave to their hearts content about which airplane they think is best for them. In the big picture, management doesn't care who flies the airplane; it does care which airplane is flown on a given route. It has and should retain the right to make that decision, unfettered by pilot disputes. We (the pilots) are our own worst enemy.

As I tried to say earlier, this crisis is not about the deployment of RJs and it is not about the wages of pilots. I is also not about which pilot sits in what seat. The industry is undergoing a major change and that requires a major change in the business plan. Management did not adjust in a timely fashion, but neither has the labor union. That change is coming whether the pilots like it or not. It may result in more RJs or less RJs, likewise it may result in the elimination or replacement of MD80s or some other type by RJs. When it is finally done there may be fewer "regional pilots" or fewer "mainline pilots". The needs of the Company will dtermine that, not the wishes of the pilots.

I don't expect the Delta pilots to be impartial about which. It is natural for them to prefer their own longevity and jobs. It is equally natural for the regional pilots to prefer theirs. Neither one of us can be expected to enjoy the prospect of unemployment. Sure their jobs are more lucrative than ours and therefore "better", I don't argue that. That too is changing and will continue to change. The $300 a year dream world of the mainline pilot is on its way out. I'm not happy about that but I try to be realistic about it. However, management can't make its decision on which job is better for which pilot.

The purpose of the airline is to make money for the investors. It is not to provide jobs for pilots. It doesn't matter whether those pilots are Delta pilots or Comair or ASA pilots. Somehow I don't think Delta pilots have quite figured that out. If they have (more likely) they are keeping it a secret.

The BS about RJ vs mainline needs to end. Union pilots need to understand that these airplanes all belong to the same company. We should be in this together. That we are not is a decision made by those who see themselves as "mainline" pilots. Maybe that makes them feel good, but it isn't true. In reality we all work for the same Company and we will all sink or swim dependent on the success or failure of that Company. Squabbling over the number of RJs or where they fly may be fun today, but ultimately it has nothing to do with the eventual outcome.

I wish us all well.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top