Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Why Mergers get Axed by the Feds

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
More info on why the Feds ax mergers
COMPETITION IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY​
Testimony of​


JOEL I. KLEIN
Assistant Attorney General
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice


Before the
Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
United States Senate

Charleston, SC
March 12, 1999​

MERGER ENFORCEMENT​
Since 1989, when airline merger review authority was turned over to the Antitrust Division, there have been relatively few mergers proposed among the major airlines. One exception is the proposal last year by Northwest Airlines to purchase a controlling stake in Continental Airlines, which we challenged in a suit filed in October under section 7 of the Clayton Act. Section 7 prohibits mergers and acquisitions that are likely to substantially lessen competition in any market. The courts have interpreted this to prohibit mergers that create or enhance market power or make it easier for a firm to exercise market power. Market power is the ability of a firm to successfully raise its price above the competitive level without that move being defeated by counteractive competitive responses by its rivals.

Northwest and Continental are the fourth- and fifth-largest U.S. airlines, respectively, and compete to provide air transportation services on thousands of routes across the country. The proposed acquisition would allow Northwest to acquire voting control over Continental, as well as share in Continental's profits, diminishing substantially both Northwest and Continental's incentives to compete against each other. We concluded that the acquisition would lead to higher ticket prices and worse service for millions of passengers, especially those traveling on routes dominated by the two airlines.
Northwest and Continental are each other's most significant competitors -- if not only competitors -- for nonstop airline service between the cities where they operate their hubs. Northwest operates hubs at Detroit, Memphis, and Minneapolis. Continental operates hubs at Cleveland, Houston and Newark. The two airlines also have a dominant share of the traffic on connecting flights between numerous cities. Millions of passengers spend hundreds of millions of dollars each year traveling between these cities.

The stock Northwest acquired represents 51 percent of Continental's voting rights, as well as 14 percent of its equity, it represented. Although Northwest has placed that stock in a "voting trust" that places certain limits on its exercise of voting control for six years, and lesser restrictions for an additional four years, the Antitrust Division does not view that as a satisfactory answer to the long-term competitive concern. Continental is still fully aware that it is owned by Northwest, which can only discourage it from pursuing competitive strategies that benefit consumers but are adverse to Northwest. That is no substitute for the kind of competitive incentives that true independence provides.
Also in the merger enforcement area, the Antitrust Division has moved aggressively to block acquisition of gates or slots that would eliminate existing or potential hub competition, including Eastern's proposal to sell eight gates to USAir at the gate-constrained Philadelphia International Airport, and Eastern's proposed sale of slots and gates at Reagan Washington National Airport to United, which operated a significant hub out of nearby Dulles airport.
 
Come on FDJ2, Marko Ramius doesn't want to hear any of that...... Parker, Lowecur, and PHXFlyer don't want to either.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
FD2,

There was no need to post that, since I already posted a link to the DOJ own press release. They were going to sue because UA hadn't done anything to assuage DOJ's concerns over their January proposal which was outlined in the link I posted and the excerpts you did. Those concerns weren't addressed because UA management no longer wanted the merger. In July '01 when all of these comments were published, do you honestly think UA wanted the merger anymore? The tail wagged the dog and the big players were happy: DOJ got their big bad press release on something that they never got to rule on because it was withdrawn, UA got out of the merger with minimal cost, and Wolf and Gangwal got their money to ride off into the sunset. You choose to take the way that deal went down at face value, fine, I was just trying to point out that there were other things at play as well. For the sake of FI, I'll just say that we agree to disagree and leave it at.
 
Why didn't LCC go after NW? They have very little overlap (like US and AWA). Their hubs are not very close. (like CLT and ATL--250 miles apart! And what about LAS/SLC/PHX?) And they have almost the same aircraft:

Both have A330s, both have A320/319s. Both have 757s. Both will have E190s (NW very likely will order them). There are differences in the DC9s, 737-3(4)00s, and 747s. But, DL and US have nothing in common at all.

NW and LCC can fly to Europe (from DTW/MSP for NW, and PHL/CLT for LCC, without any overlap), and NW could give them Asia.

It makes no sense, unless Parker just wants to get rid of the competition, and that would be blocked by the DOJ and Congress anyway.


Bye Bye--General Lee


General- Excellent point about the aircraft fleet and types. However- Doug doesn't have a strong affinity in the least for Airbus and is looking to go all Boeing with USAirways in the future. He's even tried to pick up alot of the former American aircraft that ended up at UPS to become freighters.
 
Come on FDJ2, Marko Ramius doesn't want to hear any of that...... Parker, Lowecur, and PHXFlyer don't want to either.


Bye Bye--General Lee

What is it exactly that I want to hear? I'm curious because I haven't posted much of an opinion of whether this is going through or not primarily because I don't have one yet. I was just trying to shead some illumination on a previous merger attempt, that you likely won't see printed by the parties that involved for fairly obvious reasons. You disagree, so be it. You told me to stop right there on your previous post, I believe I'll do that and bow out of this thread. Hopefully in the end, you end hearing what you wanted to hear all along.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom