Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Who will survive? Republic Airways

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Pilot124

170 Driver
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Posts
397
Two Words
$100 Oil
It's Re-Engineer-The-Business Time...
On An Emergency Basis

Sector One: Small Lift Providers

Say Good-Bye To A Lot of Regional Jets, Real Soon.
Fuel Pass-Throughs Will Pass Them Directly To The Desert

It should be back-to-the-drawing-board time for small lift providers, what some still call "regional airlines." Maybe time for a period of sheer panic, too. The issue: 50-seat and smaller RJs are being economically marginalized by skyrocketing fuel costs.

Major carriers will be looking to quickly cull out dozens of RJs in the coming months. And hundreds more in the next five years, with no replacement for this lift - or many of the markets they operate - in sight.

Most SLP agreements provide for fuel costs to be a pure pass-through to the major carrier, and that means the majors are eating a lot of red ink. A lot of RJ mission applications that once provided adequate revenue generation are now net drains on major airline systems. They cannot but move quickly to restructure (read: reduce) the fleets of RJs they're leasing in.

Faster Retirements Than Predicted. The Boyd Group's Global Fleet Demand Forecasts were the first to predict the decline in demand for new RJs, and also to predict that the number in operation represented a glut. That was as far back as 1999, when other consultants were still forecasting just the opposite from the comfort of their rearview mirrors, and the warmth of being within "the consensus.".

As attendees at our Annual Aviation Forecast Conference last October learned, retirements of CRJs and ERJs would result in global RJ fleets declining by over 1,200 units over the next ten years.

Now, with oil hovering at $100 a barrel, that forecast has been revised. The retirement projections are for over 1,700 RJs to come out of fleets for the same ten year period, with the rate front-loaded in the 2008 - 2013 period, representing approximately 835 RJs taken out of service in the US alone.



The net-new figure represents larger CRJs (mostly -900s) coming into SLP fleets to replace 50-seat -200s. But even here, there isn't a whole lot of demand going forward. There are no new-generation <70 seaters on the horizon to replace the current fleet of 50-seat and smaller RJs. That means new fleet mixes.

It also means fundamentally-revised airline route systems.

Note: The Boyd Group categorizes "regional jets" as CRJ and ERJ airliners, based on cabin ergonomics. It is inaccurate to define "regional jets" by seat capacity, otherwise airliners such as the F-100, the DC-9, the F-28, and even the 737-200/500 could be defined as "regional jets." Therefore, the Embraer E-Jet platform, which represents per-passenger cabin dimensions that are equal to and even better than 737s, is not considered a "regional jet" aircraft. That's because the market niche that aircraft was designed for was to fill the mainline airliner gap left open by Boeing and Airbus.

Late Night Oil Burning In The Planning Department. As we speak, planning departments at comprehensive network carriers are in full metal jacket status, working to moderate the level of financial drain smaller RJs are inflicting on their systems.

Legal departments are working, too, reviewing current service agreements with SLPs. Most contracts are relatively long-term - to 2013 or beyond. The problem is that there is no way that the current number of these RJs can be supported until then with jet-A heading to $3 a gallon and up. Culling the herd in is the cards.

Many agreements contain an early-out provision for the CNC, where a six-month notice can be given. In most cases, however, these notice dates don't become effective until late 2008 or 2009, and majors cannot afford to wait that long to cut RJ lift. So that means doing some deals with current SLPs. A cash payment in exchange for an early-out. Renegotiating the agreement with a financial incentive for the SLP to shift to larger CRJs or even into E-Jets, depending on the status of scope clauses at the CNC.

Wholly-Owned SLPs Could Be Going Away? Maybe - just maybe - if the financial hit becomes too onerous, some wholly-owned SLP subsidiaries could be shuttered. This is not a drill - we are talking financial bleeding here. With fuel costs going up, the economy (maybe) softening, and the specter of labor needing and demanding increases, such an action is not out of the question.

Small Lift Providers To Watch. Clearly, 50-seaters are in the economic cross-hairs. And any jet airliner smaller than that is just marking time 'til the grim-reaper comes to take it to the Budweiser plant. So the question arises regarding how the SLP sector will survive.

The hard reality is that the SLP sector will be shrinking markedly over the next three years. Hard fact: there are more 50-seat jets than can be economically flown. Hard fact: that means cutbacks in the number of operators.

SLPs must move to hasten their fleet migration into larger CRJs or, better, into the Embraer E-Jet platform. But that means bigger units of capacity, higher sector costs, and, ergo, fewer markets where such aircraft can operate compared to what 50-seaters could do before the price of jet-A headed toward the Moon.

The first option - larger CRJs - will provide better per-seat economics for the CNC customer, and for CRJ-200 operators, a relatively painless shift. But it's still an RJ, and with more seats and higher sector costs, it won't do much for the communities that are in line to see loss of service as the 50-seat cost bar goes up and CNCs cut flights.

A Potential Winner In The Wings. The SLP to watch is Republic. It has dumped its 37-seat ERJs, and has adjusted its fleet to the point where over half of its inventory is now out of RJs and into E-Jets. And, regardless of the trendy babble to the contrary, small mainline airliners such as these are the ones that have the long-term future, not RJs. Republic also has a wide stable of CNC customers, giving it enormous depth of revenue flows - not to mention some insulation from doom if the dragons of Wall Street drag a couple of CNCs into the merger pit. Without question, Republic is the best postured SLP to not only survive the upcoming RJ-Fleet-Valentine's Day Massacre, but to actually prosper.

http://www.aviationplanning.com/Predictions2008.htm
 
Aaaaand who do you work for again?

I don't see why RAH is in so much better shape than the other regional carriers. The E170 is a gas guzzler. Unless I've been grossly misinformed, the Jungle Bus burns more gas than the CRJs with equivalent seating capacity, and still burns more dead dinosaurs per passenger mile than a guppy or 'bus. Engines mounted on wings do not a mainline airliner make. It's an interesting article, just don't take the positive stuff written about your airline as gospel truth or you'll draw accusations of SKW-style Kool-Aid consumption. :rolleyes:

Turboprops are taking it back! GLA is going to run the whole show! Pass the Sharkleberry Fin!
 
Last edited:
"The SLP to watch is Republic. It has dumped its 37-seat ERJs, and has adjusted its fleet to the point where over half of its inventory is now out of RJs and into E-Jets"
An "E-Jet" is still an RJ
 
I understand every dollar makes a difference. Why is 100/barrel the 'breaking point'? Shouldn't have $80 (or lower) been the breaking point?
 
If Boyds prediction is correct(I know he's an idiot but this makes sense), I would guess more majors would go the same route as Jet Blue and US Airways and fly their own E-jets. Or like NWA did with Compass. It'll be an interesting ride! The upcycle this time was short lived.
 
RAH has a "wide stable of CNC customers"...all of which will be looking to divest contract regional feed in the event of a merger. Besides, E-Jets might be half the fleet but the OTHER half are those "gas-guzzling RJs".

They're in better shape than most, but Michael Boyd? That man is master of the obvious.
 
doesn't a 170 only have 70 seats?? How much fuels does it burn an hour? The CRJ 700 carries 70 people and burns about 3,000 total in cruise. Does the 170 compare? I agree the 170 is still a RJ in my book.
 
E175 carries 86 people and burns 1600-1700 per side in the mid 30's at M78. E170 carries 76 people with the same fuel burn.
 
Actually, fuel wise at first when the 170 was first being flown by RAH it was guzzling a ton of fuel and the CRJ 700 was out performing it. That is because everyone was flying them at barber pole everywhere. When Delta threatened to discontinue the 170 program, RAH infused a fuel savings program and after three months Delta came back to RAH awarding them more flying for the fact that when flown appropriatley they kill the CRJ 700 in the fuel burn. You will see alot more of these "E-Jets", guppy killers, baby airbuses, whatever you want to call them. So if you are not at a company the flys them, well, good luck to your career. Go where the big planes are.
 
The fuel crunch and seat mile cost of an RJ is already hitting Europe, and they are looking back at the turbo prop market.

I think what you will see is the comeback of the turbo props such as the ATR 72, Q400, and the like into the US market. These planes can fly at higher seat capacity than most RJs while operating at a fraction of what it costs to move a 50 seat RJ. Additionally, on a 300 mile flight, the block times are very comparable.

The regionals will most likely go back to what their title refers to them as, "regionals". Regional airlines will go back to flying routes <300 miles with turbo props. The 50 seat RJs will become spars with the 70+ seat RJ most likely flying only the high demand routes like Dulles to New York, or Atlanta to West Palm Beach, etc., while turbo props reclaim the smaller markets.

The regional jet was a good idea gone wrong. With its seat mile cost, it makes no sense to fly 50 people 500+ miles. I agree the E-jets will become the dominate player of what's left of the RJ flying.

The mainline carriers, after shrinking what's flown by the regional airlines, will take over some routes. However, to smaller markets they will most likely do point to point flying such as a Chicago-St.Louis-Omaha and then reverse the legs back to Chicago.

Just my two cents.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top