shamrock
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2001
- Posts
- 1,786
.... and five crew members were taken off and screened while the plane was searched....
Well thank God for that!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.... and five crew members were taken off and screened while the plane was searched....
The sad part if that they diverted for this. The smell of a burning match would have dissipated in under a few minutes. In addition, I have seen no regulation against the striking of a match on an aircraft. Probably not a good idea, but not against any reg that I have ever seen.
You mean like the Air Canada DC9 that didn't divert because the fire that "was out" after a few minutes and forced them to land later but not before most of the passengers were burned death before the plane was able to be evacuated? Do you have any idea how fast fire spreads in an airplane?!
Do a little reading.
Oh, and THANK GOODNESS the CREW was rescreened. What a chinese fire drill we have for "security"!
TSA has new method to detect just who farted: See the link attached:
http://break.com/index/fart_caught_on_infrared_camera.html
It was a match. A match has a very definate smell, and it does NOT smell like ANY type of fire. I don't know when this lady confessed, but if she did so before the divert then I don't think the divert was justified. Yes, a smell of smoke demands quick action. But when the source of smoke is identified, an immediate landing may or may not be necessary. And I don't think landing over a match being lit is necessary. Sure, that's just my opinion, but I think that I am just as concerned about safety as anyone.