I thought you leaned above 3000ft?
The number may be three grand, some manufacturers it's four grand, and all that number represents is a wave at stupid pilots. Providing a general wasteful counsel to lean above those altitudes is an attempt at idiot-proofing the leaning practice because manufacturers know that pilots are seldom taught to lean properly, that pilots seldom remember, that pilots are generally dense enough that providing a blanket direction like that is really the only way to encourage pilots not to do something damaging to the airplane.
Have you ever stopped to wonder why the manufacturer provides a general counsel to refrain from leaning below 3,000'? Is it because there's a problem with leaning below that altitude? Of course not.
The reason that pilots are cautioned about leaning below certain altitudes is because a normally aspirated engine above those altitudes can't be run at a power setting high enough for a pilot to screw up the leaning procedure and damage the airplane. Once an engine is powered back below 75% power, you're not going to hurt it by leaning. You're not going to get into detonation issues by leaning, you're not going to be burning valves by leaning, you're seldom going to cause CHT issues or approach EGT limits (where applicable) at lower power settings. Lean away.
Manufacturers also don't encourage lean of peak operations for the same reasons. Is operating lean of peak harmful? Nope. It's helpful to an engine, and the better way to operate...but only if done properly, and in context.
Can you safely lean below 3,000'? You bet. Can you safely lean above 75% power? You bet. Can you operate at power settings less than 75% power below 3,000'? Sure.
The altitudes provided by manufacturers are altitudes at which typically you can't produce enough power at full throttle to go past 75 to 80% power...the altitude at which you can't hurt the engine any more by leaning, no matter how hard you try.
In truth, if you fail to note your cylinder head temps and fly at too low an airspeed, mismanage cowl flaps, or do other things wrong, you can still hurt the engine, but the altitudes published for leaning procedures are efforts at attempting to reduce the chances for untrained pilots to do dumb things. That's all.
You haven't described your boss. Is he a pilot? Non-pilot? Instructor? Have you asked him to discuss his leaning practices? You might learn something.
Presently your description suggests that you don't understand engine operation or leaning: now is as good a time as any to get educated.
If you still feel compelled to get in the airplane with this person, offer to pay the cost of their fuel savings from constant leaning up front in exchange for them leaving the mixture rich. On a typical flight behind an O-360, that should set you back about five bucks.
I find that behind an O-360 I typically use about 25% less fuel than most. Over the course of a few hours, that adds up to more than five bucks. Proper leaning does more than merely save fuel, however. Proper leaning is essential and appropriate to improved engine health.