Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What's with the Dogs!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
Unfortunately a letter from a physician stating the animal is needed for "anxiety" is all you need to have the pet out of the carrier as a "service animal".
 
waka said:
The benefits of the ADA far outweighs its abuses. Overall, you should be happy about it.




I agree that there are some trashy looking passengers. However, times have changed and the days of donning formal attire for the sole purpose of taking a flight are over. I wouldn't want to fly for more than an hour in the cabin wearing a suit. Not to mention, your personal dress code is arbitrary. A button down shirt can be trashier than a t-shirt, depending on the design and how clothes are worn.

You might be an SIC or a PIC and in command of the airplane but it is not your airplane, it is the airlines'. If you don't like the fact that your employer doesn't have a dress code for passengers, then you get the eff out and find another job.

Besides, I doubt you would be as repulsed by the trashy attire of a Daisy Duke look-alike......you'd even welcome it.
Click to expand...

He did! He got the eff out of the industry. I guess after twenty some odd years,enough was enough.

So can I go the sex shop and buy one of those Jenna Jameson "molded replicas" , "sit it in my lap" while traveling and if questioned about it,call it my comfort device?
 
waka said:
The benefits of the ADA far outweighs its abuses. Overall, you should be happy about it.




I agree that there are some trashy looking passengers. However, times have changed and the days of donning formal attire for the sole purpose of taking a flight are over. I wouldn't want to fly for more than an hour in the cabin wearing a suit. Not to mention, your personal dress code is arbitrary. A button down shirt can be trashier than a t-shirt, depending on the design and how clothes are worn.

You might be an SIC or a PIC and in command of the airplane but it is not your airplane, it is the airlines'. If you don't like the fact that your employer doesn't have a dress code for passengers, then you get the eff out and find another job.

Besides, I doubt you would be as repulsed by the trashy attire of a Daisy Duke look-alike......you'd even welcome it.
Click to expand...

( "Gee Ward, don't you think you were a little hard on the Beaver?" )


Hey Fella's...get a load of this guy!

I wanna Party with you Cowboy....



YKLOL
 
Last edited:
~~~^~~~ said:
Why call the F/A? The dog is supposed to remain in the carrier. IMHO a perfect legitimate reason to have law enforcement meet the jet.
Click to expand...

...and we wonder why there is such a big pubic movement to limit what they see as extremes of interfering with a crewmember, etc...and trying to get that limited....:rolleyes: If being next to a dog is the worst thing to happen to you through the course of airlining, perhaps you should just stay inside your house?...or do you have so little power at home that fixating on such things makes you feel as if you have some significance?
 
" Curr Position: pro choice" - Waka

"The benefits of the ADA far outweighs its abuses." - Waka

------------------------------------------------

So, let me understand your position here:

- Kill Babies.
- Help cripples.

?

Ookaaay...

Wait...Better idea:

- How about we just kill crippled Babies so we have a perfect society and no need for the ADA and all this other PC krap?

( Can I say "crippled" or do I need to use the terms "mentally or physically challenged" ? It's just all so overwhelming.)


YK????
 
Last edited:
" How about we just kill crippled Babies..."

Okay, that would'nt work...We would cut off the supply of people who grow up and become Airline Pilots.

Wait...Maybe that's the answer to creating "The Pilot Shortage" and putting Kit Darby back in business?

Man, I come up with some great ideas when I drink this new blend of coffee from Peru. At least I'm pretty sure it's coffee...A little on the bitter side, but man it get's the wheels turning.


YKMKR
 
Voice Of Reason said:
...and we wonder why there is such a big pubic movement to limit what they see as extremes of interfering with a crewmember, etc...and trying to get that limited....:rolleyes: If being next to a dog is the worst thing to happen to you through the course of airlining, perhaps you should just stay inside your house?...or do you have so little power at home that fixating on such things makes you feel as if you have some significance?
Click to expand...
My response was to a post reporting that he saw the dog defecating in the aircraft and the owner making no effort to tell anyone, or clean it up.

The rule is that the animal remains inside its carrier, unless it is required to be out (as in a seeing eye dog) and then it must be on a harness.

The lady described clearly violated the rule, the comfort, and potentially the safety of other passengers. It is likely a frightened dog will bite another passenger. We have an affirmative duty to forsee potential harm to our passengers and protect them.

Secure areas are not designed with any places for a dog to relieve itself. We all know, eventually, the dog is going to relieve itself in a public place. Maybe a requirement for doggie diapers is in order, but in no way should an airline permit defecation in the public areas on board a crowded jet.
 
Last edited:
Like my hero Larry the Cable guy says, "The cripple stool is the Cadillac of all the poopin' stools."

And for all my fellow hunters out there, why is it that dogs can lay 3coil steamers and humans can't?
 
Last edited:
Whataburger said:
Like my hero Larry the Cable guy says, "The cripple stool is the Cadillac of all the poopin' stools."

And for all my fellow hunters out there, why is it that dogs can lay 3coil steamers and humans can't?
Click to expand...

Speak for yourself. My sphincter can push out soft-serve styled coils with ease. :p
 
In the Corps, guys used to have "coil contests". They'd come back to base after being out in the field, some "saved it up" for a day or 2(competitive advantage), and commense layin' the cable. One of the few times that being a judge in a contest would be a bad thing!
 
Whine Lover said:
" Curr Position: pro choice" - Waka

"The benefits of the ADA far outweighs its abuses." - Waka

------------------------------------------------

So, let me understand your position here:

- Kill Babies.
- Help cripples.

?

Ookaaay...

Wait...Better idea:

- How about we just kill crippled Babies so we have a perfect society and no need for the ADA and all this other PC krap?

( Can I say "crippled" or do I need to use the terms "mentally or physically challenged" ? It's just all so overwhelming.)


YK????
Click to expand...

non sequitur

they're not "babies", they're blank circuit boards.....like some posters on here :rolleyes: ahem!

now shut up and pay your taxes
 
ATRCAPT said:
Commuting to PHX and sitting to a blue-hair with a little rat-dog in a carrying case. She reaches down and opens the lid on the cage, and the dog proceeds to hop out and lay a 3 coil steamer on the carpet.

The stupid old hag wasn't going to say anything either! I finally changed seats and flagged a F/A down.

I hate dogs, and dog-owners are nearly as bad.
Click to expand...
What's your beef with dogs? Did one eat your Pu*sy
 
Last edited:

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top