Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What's everyone hedged at?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Ted Striker

Piece of the Portfolio
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Posts
399
Forecasters See No Repeat of 80s Oil Bust
Sat Nov 13, 7:28 AM ET
Business - Reuters
By Mark Babineck

HOUSTON (Reuters) - A team of market forecasters that correctly predicted the oil bust of the 1980s thinks history will not repeat itself, at least for now.

They were voices in the wilderness, belittled and shunned when they formed a distinct minority forecasting gloomy times for the oil business as the 1980s dawned.

They were right about a looming bust, of course, and now avenged forecasters Barton Smith, Dale Steffes and Henry Groppe basically agree again on where the barrel price is headed.

No bust this time, they say.

"I think the real key is the peaking of world oil production," said Groppe, a partner with Groppe, Long & Littell, who has consulted the industry for a half century.

"In this new environment, the key question is what the price is going to be required in future years to cause enough demand destruction to match the total available supply. We think it's $50 or above on a year-round average."

Smith, a University of Houston economist, also believes producer fears another late 1990s-style price collapse is highly unlikely.

"That's not in the works," he said. "I think the bottom line is, for most of the 1990s we had unusually low prices. The problem with the American consumer is, you give them a break and rather than say, 'Thank goodness,' they take it as their eternal right."

That said, Smith believes "speculative fever" that pushed oil over the $55 per barrel mark "probably was excessive." He thinks a $35 floor is likely and reasonable.

"It's plenty stimulative enough to keep the exploration side going, but it will certainly be a break from the current (high-price) tax we're facing."

Steffes, who became known as the "Cassandra of crude" for his prophecy of cheap oil by the mid-1980s, also agrees there's no bust in the offing.

"We are going to sustain them for a period yet," Steffes said. "What hasn't happened since we got to $50 oil, the exploration people hasn't come in yet and the conservation people haven't come in yet. Neither side has believed in $50 oil.

"When those two sides decide to do something, it's going to fall back, mostly likely. But before then, my judgment is that it will go to $70 ... with a severe disruption."

Steffes notes the laundry list for disruptive possibilities is lengthy considering where most production occurs nowadays.

A major difference in today's oil market forecasting from the pre-bust era is that unpredictability is now part of the landscape. Then, forecasters who saw anything besides the accepted norm were ridiculed, especially in oil hub Houston.

"We encountered lots of hostility from the heads of oil companies and everybody in the business," said Groppe, whose firm forecast sub-$15 prices for 1985. "The official U.S. Department of Energy (news - web sites) forecast was $100 a barrel. Exxon's (NYSE:XOM - news) forecast was at $80 a barrel, Shell (SHEL.L) (RD.AS) was at $85 a barrel.

"We stuck to our guns and we turned out to be right."

Human nature is to take the current environment and use it to predict forward trends. Groppe said he prefers to break the market down to fundamentals and work from the bottom up.

"You have to think in discontinuous terms, and that requires a lot of continuing work and thought," he said.

The three don't agree in lock-step. Where Groppe is among those who believe world oil production is close to peaking if it hasn't already, Smith believes there is plenty of undiscovered crude out there.

Getting to it is the tricky part.

"Where do you go exploring for oil today? The choices are between bads -- Where's the least-bad place you can look for oil?" Smith said. "There's plenty out there if you can overcome the instability and political problems."
 
Check a recent SWA SEC filing, or it's last earnings call. I believe they are heavily hedged at not more than 30 bucks or so all the way to 2007 or 2008.

The call has the specific numbers. It is impressive hedging, IMO.

Ahh, I found it!

"...The Company is over 80 percent hedged for fourth quarter 2004 with prices capped below $24 per barrel...

over 80 percent in 2005 at $25 per barrel

60 percent in 2006 at $31 per barrel

40 percent at $30 per barrel in 2007.
 
ultrarunner said:
Check a recent SWA SEC filing, or it's last earnings call. I believe they are heavily hedged at not more than 30 bucks or so all the way to 2007 or 2008.

The call has the specific numbers. It is impressive hedging, IMO.

Ahh, I found it!

"...The Company is over 80 percent hedged for fourth quarter 2004 with prices capped below $24 per barrel...

over 80 percent in 2005 at $25 per barrel

60 percent in 2006 at $31 per barrel

40 percent at $30 per barrel in 2007.

Wow, that's pretty darn good. Especially since the "experts" in the article are saying that a $35 floor is pretty likely/reasonable.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top