Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What Delta wants

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

General Lee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
20,442
Delta says focused on emerging as stand-alone carrier


NEW YORK, Nov 15 (Reuters) - Delta Air Lines (DALRQ.PK: Quote, Profile, Research), which got a takeover offer from US Airways Group (LCC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) valued at $8 billion, is focused on emerging from bankruptcy as a stand-alone carrier, a spokeswoman said on Wednesday.
"As we have said all along, Delta is focused on emerging as a stand-alone company," spokeswoman Betsy Talton said.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
To bad DAL does not have any say in this, its the creditors and they were just given 1.25 on the dollar so who knows. Believe me I do not want this to happen as much as you do but it may be out of Grinstein's hands.
 
i can't wait to have the general sling gear for me.

We shall see, but there is way too much overlap and the regulators will have to look at this too, not just the creditors. Would CLT and ATL stay? How about SLC and PHX? PHL and JFK? How about owning both NYC Shuttles? How about all of those slots in LGA and DCA? How about fleet integration? Not even close on that one. We'll see.....


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Investment Bank airline analysts on CNBC said that Delta's response was "cool." (not fonzie cool, but unwelcomed cool). They both said, it doesn't matter, Parker is in the drivers seat now. Delta might have waited too long to get through bankruptcy to have any say in the matter. Analyst said consolidation is the key, although I am not sure that benefits all of the employees. The stock holders will welcome it.
Regarding government approval, he said that US has already done their homework (i.e. millions spent on lobbyists and regulatory attorneys) and it looks quite favorable at this point.
 
Last edited:
With a recent $52 million (or so) net profit last quarter and considerable international expansion that will pay huge dividends down the road, Delta can argue that things are trending well and it is not in financial trouble - it plans to exit bankruptcy relatively soon. Reducing customer choice will never be viewed positively - reducing flights from hubs can't be a customer benefit.

Plus, owning both NY shuttles will never be acceptable. It's too early to speculate - although that's all we hear from the "airline analysts" and fortune tellers on this board...
 
With a recent $52 million (or so) net profit last quarter and considerable international expansion that will pay huge dividends down the road, Delta can argue that things are trending well and it is not in financial trouble - it plans to exit bankruptcy relatively soon. Reducing customer choice will never be viewed positively - reducing flights from hubs can't be a customer benefit.

Plus, owning both NY shuttles will never be acceptable. It's too early to speculate - although that's all we hear from the "airline analysts" and fortune tellers on this board...


Exactly.
 
With a recent $52 million (or so) net profit last quarter and considerable international expansion that will pay huge dividends down the road, Delta can argue that things are trending well and it is not in financial trouble - it plans to exit bankruptcy relatively soon. Reducing customer choice will never be viewed positively - reducing flights from hubs can't be a customer benefit.

Plus, owning both NY shuttles will never be acceptable. It's too early to speculate - although that's all we hear from the "airline analysts" and fortune tellers on this board...
No bucks, no Buck Rogers.
 
If there were a merger, hubs could close. Congressmen in any of those districts will fight for this not to happen. Even the Mormon Church in SLC could lose a hub, and their senators are high ranking and would put a block to it for sure rather than lose their "hub to the church." Oppostion will be fierce, and as On Your Six stated, DL is already on its way back to profitability.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Bye Bye General

Never has a handle been for fitting. The General's career has just been given a death sentance. This will certainly acerbate the end of Delta and probably USAir as well. Oh well, the General can always work for the likes of MaxJet.

Good by General, it's about time!
 
Never has a handle been for fitting. The General's career has just been given a death sentance. This will certainly acerbate the end of Delta and probably USAir as well. Oh well, the General can always work for the likes of MaxJet.

Good by General, it's about time!

Go crawl back under your rock. I don't work for DL, but that kind of comment is f..g stupid.
 
Never has a handle been for fitting. The General's career has just been given a death sentance. This will certainly acerbate the end of Delta and probably USAir as well. Oh well, the General can always work for the likes of MaxJet.


I don't want this merger, but I would rather Delta merge with USAir than with UAL. Consolidation is going to happen. We can't stop that. The question is who will the merger partners be.
 
Never has a handle been for fitting. The General's career has just been given a death sentance. This will certainly acerbate the end of Delta and probably USAir as well. Oh well, the General can always work for the likes of MaxJet.

Good by General, it's about time!

Huh? Ummmm Ooooookay. Nice spelling errors---"Good BY?" Smart guy.

BYE BYE--General Lee
 
Since UAL and USAir are the only airlines interested in merging, why can't they get together and leave everyone else alone?
 
Never has a handle been for fitting. The General's career has just been given a death sentance. This will certainly acerbate the end of Delta and probably USAir as well. Oh well, the General can always work for the likes of MaxJet.

Good by General, it's about time!

Nice.

Hope (more) misery finds your way also pal.
 
Your to stupid work for DL. It's over for the General at that's all this comment was about.

Say what? This guy is pure dumb. "YOUR TO STUPID." Alllllllllllright. Even if this merger were to happen, Delta would retain the name. It's over? Huh? Go back to the hills of Kentucky. (near the CVG airport)

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Since UAL and USAir are the only airlines interested in merging, why can't they get together and leave everyone else alone?

Exactly! What the heck! You know what the problem is? It makes sense. Or does it? We'll see what the government says, although they might like it if it makes life good for them out of DCA.
 
Investment Bank airline analysts on CNBC said that Delta's response was "cool." (not fonzie cool, but unwelcomed cool). They both said, it doesn't matter, Parker is in the drivers seat now. Delta might have waited too long to get through bankruptcy to have any say in the matter. Analyst said consolidation is the key, although I am not sure that benefits all of the employees. The stock holders will welcome it.
Regarding government approval, he said that US has already done their homework (i.e. millions spent on lobbyists and regulatory attorneys) and it looks quite favorable at this point.


Having spent 6 years on Wall Street and in investment banking, I can tell you most of these analysts and IBankers severly underestimate the effect of labor. They simply don't understand it. Perhaps ALPA will have some influence, ala Washington DC style, on the so-called upcoming consolidation in our industry. Certainly, with JP taking over as our leader, the possibility for labor to finally grow a sack is better than it has been in a while. IMO, in a merger the size of this one, you've got to have labor on board or you're gonna' get burried in the long run.
 
We shall see, but there is way too much overlap and the regulators will have to look at this too, not just the creditors. Would CLT and ATL stay? How about SLC and PHX? PHL and JFK? How about owning both NYC Shuttles? How about all of those slots in LGA and DCA? How about fleet integration? Not even close on that one. We'll see.....


Bye Bye--General Lee

DOJ hasn't killed a merger with less than 30% of market share in 30 years.
 
DOJ hasn't killed a merger with less than 30% of market share in 30 years.

Analysts bullish on bid for Delta
Skeptics say feds could scuttle it

By RUSSELL GRANTHAM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 11/17/06
Wall Street is giving US Airways high odds of succeeding in its bid to buy Delta Air Lines, but others say not so fast.
Some industry analysts say US Airways' blockbuster, unsolicited bid — the value of which has risen to almost $8.8 billion since it was announced Wednesday — has as much as an 80 percent chance of happening.
COMMITTEE OF INFLUENCE
Delta's unsecured creditors committee has nine members who represent thousands of creditors. The committee, which includes smaller creditors as well as some of the largest, plays a key role in deciding whether to back the airline's reorganization plan or a potential outsider's plan, such as US Airways' merger proposal.
• Boeing: The jet maker has a $3.7 billion claim from Delta's future aircraft commitments.
• Fidelity: An investment firm headquartered in Boston.
• Coca-Cola: Atlanta-based soft drink maker has a claim of at least $468,034.
• Pratt & Whitney: The engine supplier, a unit of United Technologies, has claims of at least $3.6 million.
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.: The federal agency insuring pensions has a $2.9 billion claim.
• Air Line Pilots Association: The pilots union holds a $2.1 billion claim related to its pay and pension concessions.
• Bank of New York: This big banking firm is a trustee for Delta bondholders.
• U.S. Bancorp: A financial institution.
• MacKay Shields: An investment unit of New York Life.

But others contend that federal regulators' scrutiny of the would-be takeover of Delta could delay the Atlanta airline's exit from bankruptcy by months, or the regulators could even scuttle the deal over antitrust issues.
Such concerns are among the reasons that a court-appointed creditors committee, which holds huge sway in Delta's Chapter 11 reorganization, might pass on the deal that would create the nation's largest airline, according to a person familiar with the bankruptcy case.
While that person, who requested anonymity, said creditors might conclude the proposed merger is better than keeping Delta independent, they also noted that it will likely take weeks of analysis by Delta management and the creditors committee before a decision is made on whether to encourage the deal.
US Airways took its hostile bid public Wednesday after being twice rebuffed by Delta's management, which had informed creditors about the earlier overtures.
If successful, US Airways would combine two airlines whose routes overlap 36 percent — more than any other potential marriage of Delta and another airline, according to the person familiar with the bankruptcy proceedings. That overlap dramatically raises the odds that the U.S. Department of Justice will reject or seriously delay the merger, said the person.
To get government approval, US Airways would not only have to shed one of two competing shuttle subsidiaries the two airlines operate in the Northeast, but also might have to shed more than 10 percent of its overall operations, the person said. That might include dismantling the US Airways hub in Charlotte, which serves many of the same markets as Delta's Atlanta hub.
"There is some view that this would be the most difficult merger to get done because of the overlap," the person said. "You have to know this is going to get a lot of scrutiny."
Creditors a key
Besides those hurdles, the deal also faces opposition from Delta's management. It also might encounter political opposition, ranging from cities concerned about their air service to resurgent Democrats on Capitol Hill who may investigate the effects of airline consolidation.
But at least initially, the deal also will swing on whether US Airways can convince enough members of Delta's influential creditors committee of its merits. The nine-member unsecured creditors committee — which includes such corporate icons as Coca-Cola and Boeing — has a big say in Delta's future because it represents thousands of creditors who will ultimately vote on the reorganization plan Delta needs to exit from bankruptcy protection. Delta filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last fall.
As part of that role, the committee also has significant influence in shaping the reorganization plan, including choosing Delta's board of directors and its next management team, said Jeff Morris, a law professor and bankruptcy expert at the University of Dayton School of Law.
Delta's secured lenders — those whose loans are backed by aircraft and other assets — technically have even more clout, but their debts are often paid off in a merger, Morris said.
"They can't complain if you pay them off," Morris said.
US Airways' offer is backed by a $7.2 billion financing commitment from Citigroup. The airline has offered to pay creditors $4 billion in cash and give them 78.5 million US Airways shares — initially worth $4 billion but now up to almost $4.8 billion at Thursday's market close. US Airways shares have risen 19 percent since the bid was announced.
Delta's unsecured creditor committee, with its diverse members ranging from Boeing to bond investors to trade vendors to its pilots' union, will undoubtedly have differing perspectives on US Airways' offer, said Morris. Some may view US Airways as "coming in to get the good stuff" now that Delta's prospects are improving, he said.
The view of others, he said, is "how do I get my money fast?"
The Atlanta unit of the Air Line Pilots Association, which has a $2.1 billion claim stemming from a prior deal with Delta in which it agreed to huge concessions, has said it is waiting for more information.
Attorneys for Coca-Cola and Pratt & Whitney, other members of the committee, could not be reached for comment Thursday.
Handicappers optimistic
While Wall Street analysts acknowledged that the proposed merger faces potential antitrust issues and other hurdles, some concluded the odds are still fairly high that US Airways will succeed.
Merrill Lynch analyst Michael Linenberg gives US Airways about a 60 percent chance of getting a merger agreement, citing Chief Executive Doug Parker's track record with turning the money-losing America West into a profitable carrier that acquired US Airways in a merger that many in the industry view as a success.
"We think this is achievable. If there is one management that is able to pull this off, it is this management," Linenberg said in a Thursday conference call with investors. He said US Airways will agree to whatever conditions the Justice Department sets to approve the merger.
JPMorgan analyst Jamie Baker puts the odds even higher, despite his firm's analysis that a US Airways-Delta merger would affect more cities than any other likely combination. The increased market concentration in 11 cities, including Boston, Tampa and Seattle, is "potentially unacceptable to regulators," he said in a report.
Still, he said there's an 80 percent chance that US Airways or another acquirer will succeed in getting creditor and regulatory approval.
"Clearly, lots of twists and turns lie ahead," he said.
Delta execs silent
Meanwhile, Delta executives have seemingly climbed into the cellar and slammed the door, perhaps to revise the reorganization plan they have been working on for months.
While US Airways CEO Parker did a full-court press Wednesday of media interviews and conference calls with investors, Delta CEO Gerald Grinstein restricted his response largely to a memorandum to employees that was forwarded to the press.
On Thursday, Delta's executive vice president in charge of routes and revenue management, Glen Hauenstein, canceled a public appearance at Kennesaw State University.
"There are other things occupying our executives' time, so we will reschedule," said Delta spokeswoman Gina Laughlin, adding that the airline's executive team is reviewing the proposal "as we are obligated to do."





COMMITTEE OF INFLUENCE
Delta's unsecured creditors committee has nine members who represent thousands of creditors. The committee, which includes smaller creditors as well as some of the largest, plays a key role in deciding whether to back the airline's reorganization plan or a potential outsider's plan, such as US Airways' merger proposal.
• Boeing: The jet maker has a $3.7 billion claim from Delta's future aircraft commitments.
• Fidelity: An investment firm headquartered in Boston.
• Coca-Cola: Atlanta-based soft drink maker has a claim of at least $468,034.
• Pratt & Whitney: The engine supplier, a unit of United Technologies, has claims of at least $3.6 million.
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.: The federal agency insuring pensions has a $2.9 billion claim.
• Air Line Pilots Association: The pilots union holds a $2.1 billion claim related to its pay and pension concessions.
• Bank of New York: This big banking firm is a trustee for Delta bondholders.
• U.S. Bancorp: A financial institution.
• MacKay Shields: An investment unit of New York Life.
 
Last edited:
Bankruptcy Court Can Be Tough
Venue for Hostile Takeovers
By MARIE BEAUDETTE and LAURA MCGANN
November 15, 2006 4:20 p.m.

US Airways Chief Executive Doug Parker faces a major handicap in his $8 billion bid to acquire unreceptive Delta Air Lines Inc.: Bankruptcy courts tend to be poor staging grounds for hostile takeovers.

Unless Delta's management can be persuaded to go along with the deal or its creditors stage a revolt in the bankruptcy court, US Airway's bid is a longshot, bankruptcy experts said Wednesday. Delta has exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case through at least early February, and bankruptcy courts seldom overrule management when things are going smoothly.

Mr. Parker "basically lobbed this Hail Mary pass up in the air to see who's going to catch it," said Fulbright & Jaworski partner William Rochelle. "To be able to have a prayer for success, he's got to be able to generate interest from creditors."

Mr. Rochelle, who represents secured creditors in airline bankruptcy cases, said Parker chose the "least offensive method" to persuade Delta to accept its proposal. Rebuffed by Delta's management, he decided to publicly court the carrier's unsecured creditors, who stand to gain a 45% stake in what would be one of the world's largest airlines.

But Mr. Parker, the America West chief who took the helm of US Airways when it merged with the Arizona-based carrier last fall, could be in for a bumpy ride as he attempts to take over a company protected by the bankruptcy court.

"If management is hostile to the US Airways proposal, US Airways may find it difficult to force its way into the room," said Reed Smith bankruptcy partner Eric Schaffer, who worked on US Airways' first Chapter 11 case. US Airways emerged from its second bankruptcy reorganization in 2005.

Ray Neidl, an airline analyst with Calyon Securities Inc., said convincing Delta's major creditors will be crucial if US Airways wants this deal to work.

"If the creditors see a better proposal, then the management would probably have to listen to them," he said.

Resisting Us Airways' Advances

For now, Delta is still resisting US Airways' advances. Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein responded Wednesday with a terse statement, making it clear that the company still plans to move forward with a stand-alone reorganization and that it intends to invoke its control over its Chapter 11 case to do so.

"The bankruptcy court has granted Delta the exclusive right to create a plan of reorganization until Feb. 15, 2007," he said. "We will continue to move aggressively toward that goal."

Delta, the nation's fourth largest airline, sought Chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005, about a month before changes to the Bankruptcy Code that sharply curbed debtor control in Chapter 11 cases took effect. Accordingly, the airline can expect to continue to drive its own reorganization process even beyond the current Feb. 15 plan filing deadline.

Companies in Chapter 11 protection are given an exclusive period of time to file a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, but can seek extensions if negotiations with creditors are moving forward. Although last year's bankruptcy law changes limit those to a maximum of 18 months, Delta could potentially enjoy unlimited extensions -- as did UAL Corp., the parent of United Airlines, which spent more than three years in bankruptcy.

Creditors can seek to end a company's exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case so they can file their own reorganization proposals. But bankruptcy experts say Delta's creditors would face an uphill battle wresting control from a team of competent executives managing a viable company.

Over the last year or so, Delta has negotiated deals to terminate its pilots' pension plan, obtained $280 million in annual wage-and-benefit concessions from its pilots, and said it's "on track" to exit Chapter 11 proceedings by the middle of 2007. The airline has also recalled 1,000 flight attendants in preparation for a major expansion of its international routes.

"Bankruptcy courts don't terminate exclusivity easily or quickly," Mr. Rochelle said. "It takes a lot of banging on the door before things happen."

In the absence of a deal with management, convincing a pivotal group of unsecured creditors -- the official committee that represents them in the airline's Chapter 11 case -- will be key.

The panel, formed early in every Chapter 11 case and usually made up of the largest unsecured creditors, has significant influence in a bankruptcy case and can be instrumental in swaying the court to second-guess a debtor company's business judgment.

The Delta committee, which includes aircraft financier Boeing Capital Corp., the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Bank of New York Co. and the Air Line Pilots Association, hasn't yet shown its hand. Calls to committee members and the attorney who represents them weren't returned Wednesday.

US Airways could choose to buy Delta's unsecured claims in order to gain a foothold in the case and command the committee's attention, a move potential buyers often employ in smaller Chapter 11 cases.

For example, the hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners forced an exclusivity battle in the bankruptcy of West Coast jewelry chain Crescent Jewelers and ultimately won control of the company post-bankruptcy. Harbinger later merged the company with another company it bought out of Chapter 11 -- East Coast chain Friedman's Inc.

Financier Ron Burkle's Yucaipa Cos. has bought up unsecured debt of rival auto-hauling companies Allied Holdings Inc. and Performance Transportation Services Inc., which are both operating under Chapter 11 protection, and is expected to attempt to merge them post-bankruptcy.

US Airways, whose smooth merger last fall with America West had management backing, has the experience of two past Chapter 11 cases as it moves forward with its proposal.

The airline could ally itself with other major creditors to force Delta -- or the Manhattan bankruptcy court -- to move toward a merger.

"Management will have to consider what the creditors want," Mr. Neidl said. "It's the most important element of the company now, and they'll at least have to listen to their opinion."

But Mr. Rochelle of Fulbright & Jaworski said he'd be surprised if Delta and its major creditors "ran off in different directions."

He also questioned whether US Airways' Mr. Parker, widely regarded as a savvy executive who saved his airline from extinction, would want to be the architect of a deal built on a bitter battle between Delta and its creditors.

"I don't know whether Doug Parker would want to do it on a highly adversarial basis," Mr. Rochelle said. "That would really not create the kind of an effective working environment you need to integrate three airlines.
 
Bankruptcy Court Can Be Tough
Venue for Hostile Takeovers
By MARIE BEAUDETTE and LAURA MCGANN
November 15, 2006 4:20 p.m.

US Airways Chief Executive Doug Parker faces a major handicap in his $8 billion bid to acquire unreceptive Delta Air Lines Inc.: Bankruptcy courts tend to be poor staging grounds for hostile takeovers.

Unless Delta's management can be persuaded to go along with the deal or its creditors stage a revolt in the bankruptcy court, US Airway's bid is a longshot, bankruptcy experts said Wednesday. Delta has exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case through at least early February, and bankruptcy courts seldom overrule management when things are going smoothly.

Mr. Parker "basically lobbed this Hail Mary pass up in the air to see who's going to catch it," said Fulbright & Jaworski partner William Rochelle. "To be able to have a prayer for success, he's got to be able to generate interest from creditors."

Mr. Rochelle, who represents secured creditors in airline bankruptcy cases, said Parker chose the "least offensive method" to persuade Delta to accept its proposal. Rebuffed by Delta's management, he decided to publicly court the carrier's unsecured creditors, who stand to gain a 45% stake in what would be one of the world's largest airlines.

But Mr. Parker, the America West chief who took the helm of US Airways when it merged with the Arizona-based carrier last fall, could be in for a bumpy ride as he attempts to take over a company protected by the bankruptcy court.

"If management is hostile to the US Airways proposal, US Airways may find it difficult to force its way into the room," said Reed Smith bankruptcy partner Eric Schaffer, who worked on US Airways' first Chapter 11 case. US Airways emerged from its second bankruptcy reorganization in 2005.

Ray Neidl, an airline analyst with Calyon Securities Inc., said convincing Delta's major creditors will be crucial if US Airways wants this deal to work.

"If the creditors see a better proposal, then the management would probably have to listen to them," he said.

Resisting Us Airways' Advances

For now, Delta is still resisting US Airways' advances. Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein responded Wednesday with a terse statement, making it clear that the company still plans to move forward with a stand-alone reorganization and that it intends to invoke its control over its Chapter 11 case to do so.

"The bankruptcy court has granted Delta the exclusive right to create a plan of reorganization until Feb. 15, 2007," he said. "We will continue to move aggressively toward that goal."

Delta, the nation's fourth largest airline, sought Chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005, about a month before changes to the Bankruptcy Code that sharply curbed debtor control in Chapter 11 cases took effect. Accordingly, the airline can expect to continue to drive its own reorganization process even beyond the current Feb. 15 plan filing deadline.

Companies in Chapter 11 protection are given an exclusive period of time to file a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, but can seek extensions if negotiations with creditors are moving forward. Although last year's bankruptcy law changes limit those to a maximum of 18 months, Delta could potentially enjoy unlimited extensions -- as did UAL Corp., the parent of United Airlines, which spent more than three years in bankruptcy.

Creditors can seek to end a company's exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case so they can file their own reorganization proposals. But bankruptcy experts say Delta's creditors would face an uphill battle wresting control from a team of competent executives managing a viable company.

Over the last year or so, Delta has negotiated deals to terminate its pilots' pension plan, obtained $280 million in annual wage-and-benefit concessions from its pilots, and said it's "on track" to exit Chapter 11 proceedings by the middle of 2007. The airline has also recalled 1,000 flight attendants in preparation for a major expansion of its international routes.

"Bankruptcy courts don't terminate exclusivity easily or quickly," Mr. Rochelle said. "It takes a lot of banging on the door before things happen."

In the absence of a deal with management, convincing a pivotal group of unsecured creditors -- the official committee that represents them in the airline's Chapter 11 case -- will be key.

The panel, formed early in every Chapter 11 case and usually made up of the largest unsecured creditors, has significant influence in a bankruptcy case and can be instrumental in swaying the court to second-guess a debtor company's business judgment.

The Delta committee, which includes aircraft financier Boeing Capital Corp., the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Bank of New York Co. and the Air Line Pilots Association, hasn't yet shown its hand. Calls to committee members and the attorney who represents them weren't returned Wednesday.

US Airways could choose to buy Delta's unsecured claims in order to gain a foothold in the case and command the committee's attention, a move potential buyers often employ in smaller Chapter 11 cases.

For example, the hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners forced an exclusivity battle in the bankruptcy of West Coast jewelry chain Crescent Jewelers and ultimately won control of the company post-bankruptcy. Harbinger later merged the company with another company it bought out of Chapter 11 -- East Coast chain Friedman's Inc.

Financier Ron Burkle's Yucaipa Cos. has bought up unsecured debt of rival auto-hauling companies Allied Holdings Inc. and Performance Transportation Services Inc., which are both operating under Chapter 11 protection, and is expected to attempt to merge them post-bankruptcy.

US Airways, whose smooth merger last fall with America West had management backing, has the experience of two past Chapter 11 cases as it moves forward with its proposal.

The airline could ally itself with other major creditors to force Delta -- or the Manhattan bankruptcy court -- to move toward a merger.

"Management will have to consider what the creditors want," Mr. Neidl said. "It's the most important element of the company now, and they'll at least have to listen to their opinion."

But Mr. Rochelle of Fulbright & Jaworski said he'd be surprised if Delta and its major creditors "ran off in different directions."

He also questioned whether US Airways' Mr. Parker, widely regarded as a savvy executive who saved his airline from extinction, would want to be the architect of a deal built on a bitter battle between Delta and its creditors.

"I don't know whether Doug Parker would want to do it on a highly adversarial basis," Mr. Rochelle said. "That would really not create the kind of an effective working environment you need to integrate three airlines.


Keep searching you'll find a silver linning somewhere......:D
 
Having spent 6 years on Wall Street and in investment banking, I can tell you most of these analysts and IBankers severly underestimate the effect of labor. They simply don't understand it. Perhaps ALPA will have some influence, ala Washington DC style, on the so-called upcoming consolidation in our industry. Certainly, with JP taking over as our leader, the possibility for labor to finally grow a sack is better than it has been in a while. IMO, in a merger the size of this one, you've got to have labor on board or you're gonna' get burried in the long run.

Congress is going to have a say in this and they have just become much more labor friendly. This is about as anti-competitive as it can get. If the deal doesn't die earlier they'll pressure the DOJ to pull the plug.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom