What are the chances

[positiveg]

If I was to pay for my own college and do ROTC, would I have a commitment afterwards or not? Could I do ROTC while I pay for college then "chose" to comission if I am offered a pilot slot?

Also, would doing ROTC help the chances of me getting a UPT slot with the ANG afterwards?

 

[hawaii_boy]

Don't be a btch tell me how to get a a pilot job.

 

[RickKC-135]

To answer a couple of the above post. Yes the academy gets a higher percentage of the pilot slots. I never said they didn't, just that the other routes offer them too, and they are not the "scraps" left over from the academy. As far as networking, yes the "zoo" has great networking, but do you think networking doesn't occur at A&M, Citadel, VMI, Harvard, Yale, etc.

As far as commitments go. If you do a four year ROTC program there is no commitment until the last two years. If you do the two year program the commitment to the AF starts the first day you show up for the ROTC class. There is a summer camp you must go to before this class, I don't know if the commitment starts there, but I don't think so. Be sure to ask the ROTC guys about that one.

No you can't just pay for college and do ROTC simultaneously and not have a commitment to the AF. If that's the path you want to take it's called OTS. With this path you finish college then go to OTS. Like said before, if you want to go any of these routes, make sure you have the pilot slot before you sign up.

Guy's this is not an academy vs. ROTC/OTS slam, sorry if I made it sound that way. The guy asking for advice was almost complete with school, so what's the point of advertising the academy route.

 

[positiveg]

As far as commitments go. If you do a four year ROTC program there is no commitment until the last two years. If you do the two year program the commitment to the AF starts the first day you show up for the ROTC class. There is a summer camp you must go to before this class, I don't know if the commitment starts there, but I don't think so. Be sure to ask the ROTC guys about that one.

No you can't just pay for college and do ROTC simultaneously and not have a commitment to the AF. If that's the path you want to take it's called OTS. With this path you finish college then go to OTS. Like said before, if you want to go any of these routes, make sure you have the pilot slot before you sign up.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

 

[tomgoodman]

If I was to pay for my own college and do ROTC, would I have a commitment afterwards or not? Could I do ROTC while I pay for college then "chose" to comission if I am offered a pilot slot?

Also, would doing ROTC help the chances of me getting a UPT slot with the ANG afterwards?

It sounds like you would not particularly enjoy serving in the military as a non-rated officer. Fair enough---most of us probably felt the same way. But if such a fate is absolutely unacceptable to you, better not join up. About 30% of my UPT class washed out, and still had a commitment. Then there's the possibility of a non-flying assignment AFTER you get your wings, if the "needs of the service" dictate. Rarely, you may be "grounded" for some medical item that an FAA physical would have ignored.

If you're offered a UPT slot, by all means grab it. Just be aware that there are no "guarantees" once you start training.

 

[positiveg]

It sounds like you would not particularly enjoy serving in the military as a non-rated officer. Fair enough---most of us probably felt the same way. But if such a fate is absolutely unacceptable to you, better not join up. About 30% of my UPT class washed out, and still had a commitment. Then there's the possibility of a non-flying assignment AFTER you get your wings, if the "needs of the service" dictate. Rarely, you may be "grounded" for some medical item that an FAA physical would have ignored.

If you're offered a UPT slot, by all means grab it. Just be aware that there are no "guarantees" once you start training.

Well, considering I'm thinking about enlisting in the ANG prior to applying to an ANG pilot slot, I'm sure I have no problem serving the country and being an officer/enlistee first before anything else. I'd be bummed if I went in as a pilot and was assigned something afterwards. But if it is in the ANG I wouldn't mind at all.

 

[stonewall]

Not trying to start a holy war here, Magnum. Just wondering if you might expand on this thought with some specifics because it does not reflect my experience at all.

You see more as an AD guy. At least 2-3 assignments, several different ranges, several different exercises, countless other dudes flown with with varying experience levels, more situations, tougher upgrades.

Your experience may be different in your unit, and that's fine. It's just not what I've seen. When I compare a 10 year all Guard guy to a 10 year Guard guy with 8 of them on AD in all fighter assignments, I see two different products. Yes, it depends alot on the individual. However, with two guys with the same skill level, I think the AD guy will be more well rounded. I'm not saying that it's true in your case...it may not be. And it may not be true with regard to heavy drivers. I can't comment on that. However, there's a reason my unit will only hire from AD these days.

 

[AdlerDriver]

You see more as an AD guy. At least 2-3 assignments, several different ranges, several different exercises, countless other dudes flown with with varying experience levels, more situations, tougher upgrades.

Your experience may be different in your unit, and that's fine. It's just not what I've seen. When I compare a 10 year all Guard guy to a 10 year Guard guy with 8 of them on AD in all fighter assignments, I see two different products. Yes, it depends alot on the individual. However, with two guys with the same skill level, I think the AD guy will be more well rounded. I'm not saying that it's true in your case...it may not be. And it may not be true with regard to heavy drivers. I can't comment on that. However, there's a reason my unit will only hire from AD these days.

I guess it depends on the unit to some degree. We hire outstanding AD dudes with the variety of experiences you list that are clearly valuable. You can't put a 4-ship together that doesn't have at least 8000 hours between the dudes unless you plan it well. However, my guard unit has done more Flags, overseas deployments, contingency ops and generally top-notch training deployments than I ever saw in three AD squadrons and the FTU.
My point is: When we do get a true Guard baby (we've only had 3 in the 8+ years I've been there) - they have ended up head and shoulders above their peers on AD. Earlier 2FL, 4FL and MC upgrades and a cadre of 2000-3000 hour bubbas to keep him straight.

The big thing is the Guard baby can't go part time too early. If he doesn't spend ~8 years and ~1500 hours in the above environment b/4 becoming a traditional part timer, then I agree with you.

 

[TankerDriver]

The ANG vs. AD debate is very airframe dependant. It seems as though you're getting advice from mainly a fighter pilot perspective and while it's important to get advice from every community you can, your chances of going to a fighter is probably 25-30%. This is not to discourage you, but really the reality of it all and you didn't even say you wanted fighters to begin with. I guess it was just assumed. If flying fighters is what you want, then going AD may be the better choice. However, I can tell you from a tanker perspective that going to the ANG or Reserves is the better choice. You will get more training from more experienced IP's and see more places around the world with a tanker guard unit than you would going to one of the AD super-tanker bases. You'll get more variety. Of course there is Kadena and Mildenhall who do their own thing, but as far as the stateside super-tanker bases go, the majority of your TDY's and flying will be in the desert *right now*. Takeoff, orbit/give gas for 5-6 hours, come back and do one to a full stop. We spend so much time over there that local training is often hindered. We barely get the min training required in a 6 month semester and the reason for that is when you come home from your deployment, you're back into your squadron job doing your "additional duties" and fly 2-3 times a month. In a 6 month semester, you may only be at your home station 2-3 months before deploying again. The problem with this is that a lot of our aircraft commanders and IP's got a lot of quick flight time from our desert deployments, which sent them to upgrade quicky, but not a lot of experience with anything else. Not so in the guard.

There are also many other roles the tanker plays in the wonderful world of Air Mobility Command that you will see more in the guard than you will on AD. Again, *right now*. In a tanker guard unit, you'll fly 1-2 times a week and pick up a trip or two every month. Your job as a part time pilot with a tanker guard unit is to fly airplanes and oh by the way, you can fly airplanes as a civilian while you're flying in the guard. Of course the benefits are different, which is a whole other discussion.