Brbrpole2theOM
Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Posts
- 6
I think that we would have to get minimum payment per departure to make sure that we return to profitability. I couldn't tell if that was what you were getting at, or if we would just recieve xx amount per filled seat.
The idea about letting Lakes sell seats also is pretty unique, currently Frontier can't sell just a ticket between ZK city pairs. They must have a connection onto Frontier. The only problem with the idea is now it is hurting F9 to allow GLA to sell tickets independently. They would be competing against eachother. They would have to match prices, and then it would just depend on who sells the tickets. would get the revenue. I think that this could cause too much hardship between the two companies. Also it would be very confusing when a Jet Express aircraft is being flown on a mainline route. If there were cancelations, delay's etc. Who would get the money if pax were moved to the other aircraft. It would also cause Frontier to place their jets in the best time slots/city pairs, and Lakes in less benifitial slots in order to maximize revenue. I think this would cause to many problems. If we are going to do this, we need to make it a seemless operation. Keep both parties happy and working together to provide the best product possible to passengers.
If we were serving markets that did not have the F9 code share, I could deffinetly see us trying to use our own reservation system. I think at this time, all of our Denver markets are code share with Frontier.
Keep your fingers crossed
The idea about letting Lakes sell seats also is pretty unique, currently Frontier can't sell just a ticket between ZK city pairs. They must have a connection onto Frontier. The only problem with the idea is now it is hurting F9 to allow GLA to sell tickets independently. They would be competing against eachother. They would have to match prices, and then it would just depend on who sells the tickets. would get the revenue. I think that this could cause too much hardship between the two companies. Also it would be very confusing when a Jet Express aircraft is being flown on a mainline route. If there were cancelations, delay's etc. Who would get the money if pax were moved to the other aircraft. It would also cause Frontier to place their jets in the best time slots/city pairs, and Lakes in less benifitial slots in order to maximize revenue. I think this would cause to many problems. If we are going to do this, we need to make it a seemless operation. Keep both parties happy and working together to provide the best product possible to passengers.
If we were serving markets that did not have the F9 code share, I could deffinetly see us trying to use our own reservation system. I think at this time, all of our Denver markets are code share with Frontier.
Keep your fingers crossed