Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Virgin America Trims Flights, Labor Cost on Slower Winter

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Grandpa +65

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
315
By Mary Jane Credeur - Oct 17, 2012 3:04 PM MT


Virgin America Inc., the low-fareairline partly owned by Richard Branson, will trim capacity by 3percent in the first quarter and is offering voluntary short-term leave to employees to cut costs, citing a weaker outlook.
The company, which reported a wider net loss for the secondquarter, is seeking voluntary reductions through short-termleave and flex scheduling ahead of an anticipated drop intraffic in the first three months of 2013, Chief ExecutiveOfficer David Cush wrote in a letter to employees last week. TheBurlingame, California-based company, which employs about 2,600,hasn’t said how many workers are involved.
Closely held Virgin America, which ended the second quarterwith $82 million in unrestricted cash, may need to pursue a“major restructuring” to survive, said Hunter Keay, an analystat Wolfe Trahan & Co. in New York. Virgin America hascompetition on every route, such as San Francisco to New York.Each of the 11 other airlines Keay follows has a monopoly on atleast 25 percent of their routes, he said.
“A combination of cash burn and network missteps intohighly trafficked markets” is hurting Virgin America, Keay saidin a telephone interview. “They had an assumption thatconsumers would choose product quality over price andconvenience and network carriers responded with force.”
‘Network Missteps’

Keay questioned Virgin America’s ability to survive in aclient note today and said the carrier’s failure would benefitAlaska Air Group Inc. (ALK) and JetBlue Airways Corp. (JBLU) the most.
Jennifer Thomas, a Virgin America spokeswoman, declined tocomment on Keay’s report.
In the letter, Cush cited recent unit-revenue figures bycompetitors including United Continental Holdings Inc. (UAL) andSouthwest Airlines Co. (LUV), calling them “lackluster projections”that “point to a softening environment” and necessitate VirginAmerica’s cutbacks.
Earlier this month, United said revenue for each seat flowna mile fell 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent for September andSouthwest reported revenue on that basis dipped 2 percent to 3percent.
“The forecast for the first quarter of 2013 indicates itwill be a tough winter for the industry,” Cush said.
Virgin America reported a net loss of $31.76 million forthe second quarter, 46 percent wider than the same period a yearearlier.
‘Challenging’ Period

The January to March period is “challenging” for theindustry, especially because Virgin America’s coast-to-coastroutes often “underperform in the winter months,” Cush wrotein the letter. The airline’s network doesn’t allow it to easilyshift planes to shorter north-south “sun routes” that are morepopular in the cold months, he said.
Virgin America will eliminate some flights that aretraditionally unprofitable during the first three months of theyear such as red-eyes and midweek flights, and will restore thatservice in April when demand typically improves, he said.
The airline, which started service in August 2007, has afleet of Airbus SAS A320 jets and flies to cities including SanFrancisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York’s John F. Kennedyairport and Boston.
To contact the reporter on this story:Mary Jane Credeur in Atlanta at [email protected].

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...rims-flights-labor-cost-on-slower-winter.html
 
what we've all been wondering!!! How much longer can they survive?
 
...or is this a normal drop off due to the season and PR spinning it to posture for the union drive they're having?
 
What the analysts are saying is not normal. The product is better, no doubt. But ultimately you get a free soda and from a to b.

VA has no "cash cow" monopolized routes like its competitors. And there will be more consolidation ahead to make things even tougher.

In addition, everybody i know (my parents and friends) just don't care enough about how cool it is to fly VA. I can see why it worked in the UK as the average Brit IS a lot "cooler". But the average American cares a lot less about the things that make VA different.
 
apparently there is a new VP of Network Planning/Revenue. He's pushing for this change, and honestly, it does make financial sense. VA's first quarters have always been the worst compared to the other three quarters. By eliminating some unprofitable flying (redyes, midweek flights), VA is cutting its schedule 3% for the first quarter Jan 1 - March 30. By trimming the schedule and not paying for fuel expenses on flights where money isn't being made, the plan is to cut the overall loses that are traditionally seen in the first quarter. Note that as soon as Apr 1 comes, the flight schedule goes BACK to normal 100% operations.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top