Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Virgin America on the Cobert report.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
...VAmer's entire financing structure needs to be very thouroughly reviewed. If the slightest shread of proof exists, they need to have their certification pulled immediately, ...

Iron City,
Thanks for the well thought out response. I was just having some fun with your (not really your, you know what I mean...) Steelers. My point is that what you've called for above has been conducted adnauseam, for over a year!. Very powerful interests on your (not really your, well... forget it) side of the issue filed legal brief after legal brief. CAL/DAL/AAL, etc. all spent considerable time, $$, & effort trying to convince the DOT that what you allege is/was in fact the case; They failed. They've all dropped it. The only entity refusing to give it a rest are the resident Flightinfo "Experts", not exactly the legal professionals that worked the case on behalf of the legacy carriers, but I suppose they know something those lawyers didn't. I'm just saying that because the guy says "my", "our", "your", or whatever, on Comedy Central, it hardly rates a DOT review. We've been down that road far enough, trust me, I lived it. It's legal, it's been reviewed, it meets US law; sorry that some feel the Gov't reached their decision in error, but that's the way it shook out.

As far as M Vick is concerned, don't get me started, with any luck we won't see him again. Now if a few other QB's would "depart the league" my Lions would have a shot.
 
What you're saying is true enough, but its important to add that VAmer's final aprooval was given in advance, based on them meeting a rather large set of criteria. Much of that criteria has to do (and will always have to do on an ongoing, daily basis) their unquestionable operational and financial independance from Virgin Atlantic, Richard Branson and any other foreign investor(s). To get aprooval, a bill of goods was sold to US lawmakers that RB was a quiet, benevolent little minority stakeholder, that's it. The instant that changes, it literaly becomes a big federal case, and VAmer's operations would then be subject to the same criteria they had to meet to get aprooved, to remain aprooved.

His arrogance for our laws and his desire for world domination for its own sake is the lose string hanging off a 300 dollar cashmere sweater. Maybe he'll clip it off before anyone notices. Or maybe it will catch and the whole thing will come unraveled.

As for Vick, good riddance to a punk thug POS. I liked him early on, and couldn't help but respect his natural ability and versitility as a player. Unfortunately as a person he crossed the line and will pay dearly with at least a large portion of his best years as a player. Personal foul, 10,000 yard penalty. The ruling on the field stands.
 
What you're saying is true enough, but its important to add that VAmer's final aprooval was given in advance, based on them meeting a rather large set of criteria. Much of that criteria has to do (and will always have to do on an ongoing, daily basis) their unquestionable operational and financial independance from Virgin Atlantic, Richard Branson and any other foreign investor(s)... .

You're right regarding the criteria that was placed upon them. I'm sure they understand the gravity of the situation & have no intention of failing to comply. I believe they have made/will continue to make the fundamental changes required. These were the rules established in granting the certificate, and as such, VA agreed to abide by them. Should they fail to "hit all the gates" someone who's watching closer than we are, will call them on it.

As far as Vick...I agree with you 100%. Take care, nice talking to you. I appreciate the "flame free" conversation!
 
Colbert throwing water on Branson (and vise-versa) was likely staged, go to wikipedia and look up 'viral video' - it's a very current marketing technique, and this skit is not remarkable.

meh
 
Last edited:
Flightinfo is about the most Soviet board I've come across on the internet.

If you guys are so sure that US pilots are the best around and you work for good, strong American companies... let VA (or Branson, if he wants to pretend it's his) compete with you and quit whining about it.

Funny how the same sort of talk came about when a little company in Texas started a while back... now they're accepted as part of the "club."

VA will either tank, or will succeed and be accepted. Either way, quit whining and let the market work. And for God's sake, (on other VA threads) quit acting as if pilots who go there are traitors or fools. Just because some guys aren't socialists doesn't mean they're trying to harm you.
 
Let VA (or Branson, if he wants to pretend it's his) compete with you and quit whining about it.

When Branson claims that it is "his airline" he is openly admitting violating the laws of our country.

If pilots in the U.S.A are against Virgin they are free to vocalize their protest and take any actions (that are legal) against Virgin America. And Virgin is free to fight back. That is capitalism at its best.
 
When Branson claims that it is "his airline" he is openly admitting violating the laws of our country.

If pilots in the U.S.A are against Virgin they are free to vocalize their protest and take any actions (that are legal) against Virgin America. And Virgin is free to fight back. That is capitalism at its best.

Touché.

I just think that people seem a little protectionist... I don't necessarily agree with the laws preventing foreigners from "playing with airplanes" in the US. If they obey the safety rules, I don't care.

 
Stephen Colbert is NOT afraid of bears. He merely recognizes them as a threat to hardworking citizens of the 'nation' everywhere. As such, they must be watched. Closely.

Bears are one of the main reasons why there is no place for women in the workforce. Women menstruate, and that attracts bears.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top