lookup
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2002
- Posts
- 50
Okay, let me say up front that I have a limited view of the world when it comes to airline pilot lives. If it makes someone feel good by flaming me, then flame on. But what I want to do with this post is share some thoughts and perhaps get a better view of the world you guys (and gals) are struggling in. Had my high-tech job laid me off in early '01 I would be in the furlough trainwreck at AmEagle, but I lucked out and still have a decent high-tech job, but my heart is in the cockpit...
Anyway... on to my thoughts and questions...
I read with much interest and sadness the posts in the "Thank you DAL pilots" thread. The issues between DAL and the feeder lines sound just like the ones at AA and it's feeders. I talk at great length to my best friend at AE as well as the men and women of AA as I fly (as pax) for my "day job".
It seems to me that these issues are as complicated as the Isreal/Palestine conflict! I can't help but wonder how the industry ended up this way. Does corporate management bear 100% of the fault there...? maybe... Does ALPA/APA share in it? perhaps...
How is it that "main line" pilots and FAs feel so much resentment toward feeder peers of the same parent company? Don't the feeder crews directly contribute to the same parent company day in and day out? Don't they work crappy hours for really crappy pay just to "pay their dues". When (IF) they get hired by the main line, do they "magically" become a new person and get embraced by the "big boy club".?
How hard is it for main line crews to understand the economics of small/mid market lines and the need for low cost feeds into the large lines?
What would be so wrong with a fully integrated "list" with "B scales" for planes less than 100 seats on small/mid market lines?
It seems all these games that management plays to try to get around scope clauses and other union protections end up hurting everyone. Bottom line is the bottom line. As long as any of us (me included) work for a company that has stock, we are all second to the needs of the public stockholder.. That is just a fact of life. Upper management is taught in business school to lower costs to compete in price sensitive markets. Return on stock investment is the American mantra...
Let's play a game... Kind of like "can average joe prop pilot fly a 707 without killing anyone?"... instead, let's make it "can Joe pilot fly a full blow Airline in crisis..."
Me first...
Steps:
- fire most of the middle managers, make all management pay calibrated to corporate performance including customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, and profits.
- fire anyone who thinks they "deserve to be there" and are no longer interested in building a company that is a great place to work for (and be a pax on)
- scrap all existing past union contracts, force integration of seperate unions between feeders and main line
- work with ALPA to create some thing that doesn't currently exist
- close the gap between the worst paid and the best paid crews (feeder probey pay is criminal! and 777 capt is pay is a joke the other way)
- incent crew/rampers/gate agents for performance
- create a system that allows the feeders to operate at low cost, develops small/mid markets, and develop team players to move to main line after some time in service.
Just some thoughts from the outside.... (constructive comments / ideas welcome) route flames to /dev/null (I will)
Anyway... on to my thoughts and questions...
I read with much interest and sadness the posts in the "Thank you DAL pilots" thread. The issues between DAL and the feeder lines sound just like the ones at AA and it's feeders. I talk at great length to my best friend at AE as well as the men and women of AA as I fly (as pax) for my "day job".
It seems to me that these issues are as complicated as the Isreal/Palestine conflict! I can't help but wonder how the industry ended up this way. Does corporate management bear 100% of the fault there...? maybe... Does ALPA/APA share in it? perhaps...
How is it that "main line" pilots and FAs feel so much resentment toward feeder peers of the same parent company? Don't the feeder crews directly contribute to the same parent company day in and day out? Don't they work crappy hours for really crappy pay just to "pay their dues". When (IF) they get hired by the main line, do they "magically" become a new person and get embraced by the "big boy club".?
How hard is it for main line crews to understand the economics of small/mid market lines and the need for low cost feeds into the large lines?
What would be so wrong with a fully integrated "list" with "B scales" for planes less than 100 seats on small/mid market lines?
It seems all these games that management plays to try to get around scope clauses and other union protections end up hurting everyone. Bottom line is the bottom line. As long as any of us (me included) work for a company that has stock, we are all second to the needs of the public stockholder.. That is just a fact of life. Upper management is taught in business school to lower costs to compete in price sensitive markets. Return on stock investment is the American mantra...
Let's play a game... Kind of like "can average joe prop pilot fly a 707 without killing anyone?"... instead, let's make it "can Joe pilot fly a full blow Airline in crisis..."
Me first...
Steps:
- fire most of the middle managers, make all management pay calibrated to corporate performance including customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, and profits.
- fire anyone who thinks they "deserve to be there" and are no longer interested in building a company that is a great place to work for (and be a pax on)
- scrap all existing past union contracts, force integration of seperate unions between feeders and main line
- work with ALPA to create some thing that doesn't currently exist
- close the gap between the worst paid and the best paid crews (feeder probey pay is criminal! and 777 capt is pay is a joke the other way)
- incent crew/rampers/gate agents for performance
- create a system that allows the feeders to operate at low cost, develops small/mid markets, and develop team players to move to main line after some time in service.
Just some thoughts from the outside.... (constructive comments / ideas welcome) route flames to /dev/null (I will)