Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Vfr Mel

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You stated that "Everything on the airplane is required to be working", which is not true. I then highlighted the applicable regulation that states which things (VFR day requirements and stuff on the required equipment list) are required to be working when you don't have an MEL and what you have to do to be legal to fly it (placard and deactivate, blah blah blah). I highlighted everything BUT the MEL stuff, where you got that I hightlight "a bunch of MEL stuff", I'm not sure.

Maybe it's your use of the word "deferred" in your original post that threw me but I've usually only used that in association with an MEL. Not saying your wrong in using it, I just misunderstood.

I think we all agree in the original poster's misuse of the term "VFR MEL" though.

-'duff
 
drinkduff77 said:
You stated that "Everything on the airplane is required to be working", which is not true. I then highlighted the applicable regulation that states which things (VFR day requirements and stuff on the required equipment list) are required to be working when you don't have an MEL and what you have to do to be legal to fly it (placard and deactivate, blah blah blah). I highlighted everything BUT the MEL stuff, where you got that I hightlight "a bunch of MEL stuff", I'm not sure.

Maybe it's your use of the word "deferred" in your original post that threw me but I've usually only used that in association with an MEL. Not saying your wrong in using it, I just misunderstood.

I think we all agree in the original poster's misuse of the term "VFR MEL" though.

-'duff

i should have elaborated a little but i figured it was implied. what i meant is that everything is required to be working, but if something is not working the flight can be continued depending on the which equipment is inop and if the proper mx procedure is followed.

sort of the same wording as the answer to the question- when are you supposed to file an alternate when flying IFR? A: always . . except when the weather is yada, yada, yada.

. . . and sorry, you were right. there were not a lot of MEL areas highlighted.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom