Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

V1, Die, Heaven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 350DRIVER
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 0

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
3

350DRIVER

more bad news..



http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04231/363350.stm

Bronner: No rescuers for US Airways

Chairman says a return to bankruptcy soon would mean oblivion for the troubled airline

Wednesday, August 18, 2004

By Dan Fitzpatrick, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette




If US Airways files for bankruptcy in less than a month, airline chairman David Bronner predicts that no one, including himself, will be willing to rescue the nation's seventh-largest carrier from oblivion.





http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/imag...s/blurbrule.gif



Related article:

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/imag...simages/dot.gif Keeping air service to London could be complicated


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/imag...s/blurbrule.gif





In the last 30 days, Bronner said only one investor has contacted him about a bankrupt US Airways -- and that was a foreign player interested only in the leftover piece of an airline that employs 28,000 people, including about 8,000 in the Pittsburgh area. "They don't want the whole thing," he said.

Bronner, who runs the Retirement Systems of Alabama, the pension fund that owns a controlling stake in the ailing airline, claims that US Airways' predicament is more dire than it was in 2003, when the company reemerged from bankruptcy with his help. The outspoken pension fund manager fought off a rival bidder to provide $240 million in equity in the airline -- a stake now worth less than $100 million.

This time around, Bronner does not expect anyone to compete for the right to keep US Airways intact and compete in an industry roiled by high fuel prices and aggressive low-cost carriers such as JetBlue Airways and Southwest Airlines. Such reluctance extends even to Bronner, who knows that a second bankruptcy will wipe out most of his investment.

Bronner said he can't imagine pumping more money into the airline and starting a new set of negotiations with creditors and labor groups -- the same labor groups that have yet to give the airline an additional $800 million in concessions the airline claims it needs to survive. "It is just not worth it," he said in a telephone interview yesterday.

US Airways faces a number of critical hurdles next month that could plunge the carrier back into bankruptcy, the first being a $110 million pension payment due its flight attendants and machinists on Sept. 15 -- a payment that could deplete its cash and force a default on more than $700 million in federally-backed loans.

US Airways is asking the Internal Revenue Service for permission to reduce the Sept. 15 payment by almost $28.6 million, which would leave it with a reduced obligation of $81.4 million. But Bronner said yesterday that the reduced obligation, if the IRS signs off, may not be small enough for the airline to still avoid defaulting on the loan.

Bronner also dismissed suggestions that the airline's September deadline for new union agreements could be extended, saying that a "couple" options have been discussed but they are "so far-fetched no one pays any attention to them." One, he said, is to make all required pension payments due that month and "hope for a couple more weeks," but "that doesn't get you out of your problems."

He does not think the airline can renegotiate the federal loan covenants requiring US Airways to make progress on cutting costs by Sept. 30, saying that would "set off 40 different other whistles" among its creditors. "I don't think we have any options if we don't have any labor agreements" by mid-September, he said.

Faced with no cooperation from labor, Bronner would file Chapter 11 bankruptcy rather than sell the company's assets, hoping to "protect as many people" as he can until all options are exhausted. The chances of getting agreements with the labor groups and thus avoid another bankruptcy filing stand at "50-50," he said.

US Airways since last spring has been trying to coax another $800 million in annual concessions from its pilots, flight attendants, machinists and passenger service workers -- all of who sacrificed more than $1 billion during the airline's last bankruptcy.

Negotiations have been slow, and in the case of the machinists, nonexistent. The only group close to an agreement is the pilots union, holed up this week with management negotiators in Arlington, Va., where the airline is based.

Bronner, amazed at the slow pace, has been trying "to rationalize in my own head" the lack of new agreements so close to the mid-September deadline. Perhaps employees "have heard the sky is falling for so long" that they "simply don't believe it."

But Bronner -- and US Airways -- is running out of patience. "Either you do it or you don't, but you sure don't wait until the last minute. ... If you do it at the last minute, all that does is hurt the company every day it drags on. Each day it drags along and pokes along, each day it becomes more difficult."
 
Keeping air service to London could be complicated

US Airways, other airlines could move the route to another city


Wednesday, August 18, 2004

By Mark Belko, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Keeping nonstop air service between Pittsburgh and London could end up becoming far more complicated than finding another carrier willing to fly the route being abandoned by US Airways in November.

In addition to losing the nonstop flights, the region also could end up losing the right to fly the Pittsburgh-to-London route, which was awarded to US Airways in 2000 after a contentious battle between the British and U.S. governments.

In fact, the London route, commonly known as a gateway, is such a coveted prize in the aviation industry that local political and airport leaders could end up competing against US Airways and possibly other airlines for the rights to it.

Once US Airways ends the service Nov. 7, it would have the option of applying to the U.S. Department of Transportation to transfer the rights to another city.

Other airlines also would be able to apply to secure the rights to the London route, either for the purpose of flying it from Pittsburgh or from another city at which it offers service.

The number of gateways to London's Heathrow and Gatwick airports is restricted under the bilateral agreement between the United States and Great Britain, and none currently is available. As a result, there could be keen interest from other airlines in securing the rights once US Airways drops Pittsburgh-to-London service.

"There is interest in serving the United Kingdom. We have a very restricted agreement with the United Kingdom. We expect interest in the market," said William Mosley, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Transportation.

US Airways spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said the airline has not decided whether it will seek to transfer the rights to the route to another city. The airline also flies nonstop to London from Philadelphia, but would not be able to transfer the rights to that airport. US Airways also offers nonstop service to London from Charlotte, N.C.

Kent George, executive director of the Allegheny County Airport Authority, said regional leaders would fight to keep the rights to the London route.

"If I have a replacement carrier and need it for London, we'll do everything in our power to retain the authority," he said. "We will work to retain that service and believe we can retain that service."

The Airport Authority, county Chief Executive Dan Onorato and the Allegheny Conference on Community Development, through the Pittsburgh Regional Alliance, have been talking to other carriers about picking up the service to London and to Frankfurt, Germany, which US Airways also will drop in November.

"We are looking at all opportunities to keep the [London] authority but one of the key things you need to retain the authority is having a carrier willing or ready to assume the service and, very bluntly, we do not have a carrier today to assume the service," George said.

Even if Pittsburgh loses the route, there still may be opportunities for airlines to fly into Great Britain's Manchester or Stansted airports from Pittsburgh, George said.

US Airways ended up getting the Pittsburgh-to-London route in July 2000 after a pitched battle between the British and U.S. governments over aviation rights between the two countries.

It was only after months of negotiations, pressure from local officials, and the intervention of former U.S. Rep. Bud Shuster, then powerful chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, that officials ended up reaching an agreement that allowed US Airways to fly to London from Pittsburgh.

As for the Pittsburgh-Frankfurt flight, US Airways Chief Executive Officer Bruce Lakefield yesterday rejected a request by U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter that the airline continue the nonstop flight beyond Nov. 7.

In a letter to Specter, Lakefield said the flight posted a net loss at current levels of traffic volume at the airport, and said "the prospects only get worse" as US Airways cuts service and connecting traffic at the airport later this summer and fall. "Because we project significant losses for the fourth quarter 2004 and the first quarter 2005, in good conscience, I cannot ask our employees to take pay cuts while at the same time fly a route that I know will lose money," Lakefield said.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top