Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

USA Today bashes Jonathan Gibbs!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Newjetjockey

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2003
Posts
173
This is appalling. This is an excerpt from a USA Today article about Jetblue's laptops. Jonathan Gibbs was the first officer on flight 5481 in CLT. The Facts are the Jonathan Gibbs did make an error that resulted in the aircraft being 120 lbs under the stated weight, thus the error was on the side of Safety. I suggest ALL Pilots boycott USA Today. NEVER BUY that **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** Paper again (like a pilot has ever bought a paper). Send an e-mail the editor explaining that you are boycotting them for their slander.

Was crash preventable?

As they prepared their 19-seat commuter plane Jan. 8 to depart Charlotte, two Air Midwest pilots followed the standard procedure to calculate the plane's weight. First officer Jonathan Gibbs jotted a series of figures onto a sheet of paper. Then he added them.

Interrupted several times, Gibbs made two errors, according to National Transportation Safety Board documents. As a consequence, he underestimated the plane's weight by 110 pounds. The plane took off slightly above its weight limit. Within seconds, all 21 people aboard were dead after the plane went out of control and crashed.

Federal accident investigators have focused on maintenance done on the plane shortly before its fatal flight. But they say that weight is one of several factors also under investigation. The incident highlights how small errors by pilots can compromise safety.


Here is the whole story:
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/...21/5605389s.htm
 
OK, I sent-in my scathing letter to USAToday. I couldn't believe they wrote that crap when I read it in the paper two days ago.

I agree... boycott that piece-of-s***newspaper.
 
110 lbs., huh... That would surely do it. NOT!

Like a L1011 captain told me once--"there's probably a couple thousand pounds of dust and bread crumbs on this airplane anyway..."

I get more hard news from my kid's "Weekly Reader" than that rag.TC
 
Me too!!
 
It's hard to believe all the potential sh#t we are exposed to as pilots for a measely 20-30k per year...Whoever wrote that article should be publicly denounced for his/her ignorant drivel.
 
Unfortunately..

The dead have always been easy targets for the bottom feeders of the newspaper industry..

We should boycott the sale and distribution of the rag all over the world even if it means the Captains will have to buy their own papers..

Mike
 

Latest resources

Back
Top