Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

US Airways CFO takes jab at SWA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

lowecur

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
2,317
My my but times have changed. It seems US Airways is not going to take it anymore. First Dougie takes a swat a Jetblue, now the CFO Derek Kerr tells SWA they are no longer at the bully pulpit in PHL and have just been reduced to another player.

Also, CO President Jeff Smisek takes Jetblue and Delta to task. These guys have turned into Don Rickles with their mean spirited remarks.

On another note, I was interested in a post made on another board where Lehman Brothers wrote an apparent 150 pg report on Jetblue. The report spelled out that Jetblue is losing money on it's upstate routes based on 12 month data up to Sept 2005: City-Pair LF PRASM

  • BUF-JFK 81.3% 17.94 cents - $300,000 profit
    BTV-JFK 84.3% 17.57 cents - $2M loss
    JFK-SYR 84.0% 21.69 cents - $2.1M loss
    JFK-ROC 77.0% 17.15 cents - $4.5M loss(worst performing B6 route)
Now you know why the yield department was moved back East and probably why John Owen was sacked. Jetblue needs to add more of these type routes to increase RASM, but obviously they need to do a much better job on yield. SYR is the high cost station and Jetblue did something right in yield mgt by offering less discounted fares in that market. I believe SYR is now running close to 90 LF since Independence Air tanked, and yet B6 still only runs 3 flts per day. Instead they continue to reward ROC with 5 flts per day just to maintain market share.........and against who?.....a few RJs and props....This is mgt at it's worst.


[FONT=arial, helvetica]Transportation[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]Airlines Thrive in Thinner Air
[/FONT][FONT=arial, helvetica]By Ted Reed
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]5/15/2006 7:09 AM EDT[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]
The airline industry is suddenly awash in good news.
Demand for seats is rising, while supply is falling. The historically profitable summer months are approaching. Southwest Airlines (LUV:NYSE) , which has kept fares down for all carriers, faces increasing cost pressure. Companies are talking about paying down debt. A handful are even making money.

During the first quarter, domestic fares rose 10.5% from a year earlier, while domestic capacity fell 4.1%, the Air Transport Association reports. Overall capacity fell 1.9%, after international increases. The positive trends cheered the Bear Stearns Global Transportation Conference in New York on Wednesday, even as high fuel costs continue to cast a pall over the industry.

Capacity restraint is probably the industry's biggest positive, although it is not entirely a result of the airlines' strategic thinking. "The capital markets aren't as excited about airlines as they were some years ago," Gerard Arpey, CEO of AMR (AMR:NYSE) , told the conference. "Therefore, there is capacity restraint in this industry, [which] is leading to the environment we have today."

Added Derek Kerr, CFO of US Airways Group (LCC:NYSE) : "The reason it's working in the industry right now is really capacity. As capacity comes down, RASM (revenue per available seat mile) is increasing."

The closely followed measure will likely be in the 12% to 15% range for the second quarter, Kerr said, but could slow afterward as comparisons with 2005 become less favorable. US Airways was a first-quarter leader in RASM growth, Kerr said, because the 2005 merger of the former US Airways with America West Airlines led to reduced capacity, network synergies and strong pricing comparisons with the cash-starved former US Airways.

AirTran Holdings (AAI:NYSE) in particular benefits from capacity reductions by competitors, said President Bob Fornaro. Pulldowns by Delta Air Lines (DALRQ:OTC BB) and US Airways are fueling RASM growth on connecting flights to Florida and throughout the East Coast, he said. AirTran's presence in Detroit and Flint means it is also benefiting from pulldowns by Northwest Airlines (NWACQ:OTC BB) , which said Wednesday that it reduced first-quarter capacity by 10%, cutting its fleet to 367 planes from 432 planes.

Continental's (CAL:NYSE) Jeff Smisek recently offered some colorful commentary on the airline industry and its players: Jetblue - "They are a low-cost carrier, they are also an extremely low-RASM carrier, and their customers don't pay them a penny to watch those I Love Lucy reruns. ... It is a wasted investment in my mind." Delta - "Our successful international expansion is being copied by a lot of people, including at least one bankrupt airline in Atlanta. They've already gone through their stockholders money; now they are using their creditors' money. They are throwing a lot of capacity into the market. I predict they will lose their shirts on it."

Reduced capacity means "we're starting to see some pricing power," Fornaro said. "There's been no pricing power the last five years." On a conference call Monday, UAL's (UAUA:Nasdaq) executive vice president, John Tague, said that United proposed 16 major domestic fare increases in the first quarter. Six were matched by competitors. United also introduced dozens of international and "tactical" increases, Tague said.

Improved pricing prompted AirTran on Wednesday to raise its second-quarter RASM to a range between 13% and 16%, up from 12% to 14%. Analysts had expressed disappointment at the earlier guidance. Better revenue also means that American, which has $4.8 billion in cash, has "begun to chip away" at its $20 billion debt load, Arpey said. And Alaska Air Group (ALK:NYSE) , like US Airways and Southwest, had a profitable first quarter. "We're the most seasonal of the larger airlines," said CFO Brad Tilden. "It's not uncommon for us to dig a bit of a hole in the first quarter, (so) it's very gratifying to start the second quarter with money in the bank."

Another positive for the industry is that Southwest, for a long time the 500-pound pricing gorilla, seems more prone to raise fares as its fuel hedges expire and perhaps less prone to chew up its competitors. "It's definitely having a huge effect on the industry," US Airways' Kerr said. "They're the only airline that really prices to their cost, [and] that kept pressure on the industry."

Kerr noted that Southwest "tried to run US Airways out of Philly, until we produced a transaction that was strong and had lots of cash -- then they backed off in Philly."

Meanwhile, Frontier Airlines (FRNT:Nasdaq) CFO Paul Tate said that Southwest "has a problem on the labor side (because) their cost per pilot is much higher than anybody else's in the industry." Tate dismissed the perception that Frontier was badly hurt when Southwest began flying to its Denver hub in January. Frontier RASM grew by 6.8% in April, after rising just 1.9% in the first quarter.

Despite the good news, it is clear that pricing has not caught up with high fuel costs. Fuel costs rose 28% in the quarter, the ATA said. "We're going to have to figure out how to take that cost and pass it on or we're not going to be in business," Arpey said. "Recent results would indicate we're still not doing a very good job."
[/FONT]
 
Kerr noted that Southwest "tried to run US Airways out of Philly, until we produced a transaction that was strong and had lots of cash -- then they backed off in Philly.


I think we backed off of Philly because we can't get no more gates. Plus, we opened at least 3 new cities and got 10 extra gates in MDW since then. Only so many "new" airplanes coming, you gotta put them somewhere. They were trying to rebuild MSY too... lots on the plate.
 
SWA/FO said:
I think we backed off of Philly because we can't get no more gates. Plus, we opened at least 3 new cities and got 10 extra gates in MDW since then. Only so many "new" airplanes coming, you gotta put them somewhere. They were trying to rebuild MSY too... lots on the plate.


Another reason SW backed off in Philly because a lot of their Paxs into Philly were helping to fill US's international flights.
 
Maybe ASA starting Wilmington, DE (across the way) with two daily RJs scared USAir and Southwest!!?????!!!?? (hey, we now hit all 50 states--yippy)


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
Maybe ASA starting Wilmington, DE (across the way) with two daily RJs scared USAir and Southwest!!?????!!!?? (hey, we now hit all 50 states--yippy)


Bye Bye--General Lee

Maybe if a pax flew out of ILG "tax free" to anywhere in the world, the city would do really well.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom