P3-Adub,
I will be honest with you when the ERP was beving devised I knew it would have concessions and other work rulke changes to it. In fact I was quite surprized when I found out it was 10% in givebacks. What I hated the most about the whole thing was that it really did not have anything for the furloughees in it. I have many good friends that where hired in 2000, after leaving good military and civilian jobs. Now these guys have an uncertain furtures as to when they might return. I was upset with the ERP and ALPA for not putting some pressure on our feeder carriers to hire some furloughees, or having anykind of timeline to get the 844 back on property. In regards to ALPA and hiring our furloughees, it pi$$es me off that when other 121 carriers had furloughed there pilots in the past, such as Sun Country, or when UFS went under we invited there pilots to interviews and hired many of them. The furloughees could give 24 months without any worry just as much of training expense as any other new hire that could leave to head towards greener pastures. Today our furloughess have the kiss of death on there resumes being a furloughee. So they are told that there greievances will not be acted upon if we sign onto the ERP and we will give them longevity.
Also, allowing the US Air code share was done without MR, and simply thrown into the ERP at the last minute.
Anymore outsourcing of flying that may go into the Star Alliance plan.
Anyway, in regards to the 400's they have been on the chopping block plan around 2000. We have fewer seats in our 400's then our competitors do, and we have a lot of room for the first and business seats, but that market is way down and we need the suits at WHQ to figure this out and adapt to the changing airline market. The 400's are for sale, but no buyers are intrested. IMHO, since airliners are parking planes and being given great deals from Boeing and Airbus on new equipment, we will probably end up with them for awhile, and hopefully market dynamics will change and we can configure them to be profitable again.
The one rumor I remember hearing TK guys telling me was that the company in the future wanted to go more inline with 2 fleets. 777 for most Int'l flying and various Airbus' combo fleet to do the domestic flying. This would elliminate the amount of transition training and expense that UAL does with today's fleet plan. Just a rumor, but as you can see UAL has changed the fleet already and with the sale of the 400's I would not be surprised if we see another fleet head towards VCV. I am with you on the 400's I hate to see them go, and can see them sticking around for the next couple of years.
Now as far as the vote, I see it as being a waste of time unless we get the IAM and AFA to come up with a fast plan to givebacks. I can't see it happening and therefore we are headed towards the CH.11 playbook. I started out a strong No in July and was on the fence for a long time at the beginning of August, and now I have to say I will probably vote yes. As far as it stopping furloughs, that is what the ERP states, but you can see the company has not honored C2K so why would they honor the ERP.
Can't wait to see who we to run this airline. Sorry to go on, but it is going to be a long 29 days!