I've read some of the recent threads that contain the usual paths of conversation regarding unions and their influence on the industry.
Can someone help explain to me why traditional unions (and I'm a proud furloughed ALPA member) consistently reject work rules that reward individual performance? When the first ERP was in the works at UAL, one of the prizes the union brought back to the masses was a difference in how pilots would be paid schedule vs. block, with the change resulting in an increase in pay for no more work done. It astounded me that we celebrated this when the company was losing huge sums of cash every time the wheels went in the wells.
As a proud new father of an 8 month old (thanks, 9/11, at least I get to watch my son grow up...now if only I can feed him too) I'm learning the importance of encouraging desirable behavior and discouraging undesirable behavior (I'm not equating airline pilots to 8 month olds, although when the hotel van isn't on time the comparison is tempting). The work rule mentioned above was in place at the regional where I flew before UAL and it made me sad to watch captains fly at 2/3 cruise speed just to get the extra tenth or two (unless it's the go home leg, than it's max blast...so much for customer empathy). It strikes me that these work rules serve to reward undesirable, ineffecient behavior.
Here's the root of my thought: either A) pilots truly are in a position to direct the chorus (fuel, catering, flight attendants, maintenance, appropriate altitudes for wind, etc) and should be appropriately rewarded for good performance in the things they claim to be the final authority over, or B) we don't have that much control, shouldn't be held accountable, and (gasp) shouldn't be paid as much. I see option A in line operations and believe I deserve the resulting pay (not the pay da Massa hands down, but the pay my union negotiates, thank you).
Should I have gone to Southwest because the mentality I speak of just won't ever come to fruition at UAL in the foreseeable future?
W8N
Can someone help explain to me why traditional unions (and I'm a proud furloughed ALPA member) consistently reject work rules that reward individual performance? When the first ERP was in the works at UAL, one of the prizes the union brought back to the masses was a difference in how pilots would be paid schedule vs. block, with the change resulting in an increase in pay for no more work done. It astounded me that we celebrated this when the company was losing huge sums of cash every time the wheels went in the wells.
As a proud new father of an 8 month old (thanks, 9/11, at least I get to watch my son grow up...now if only I can feed him too) I'm learning the importance of encouraging desirable behavior and discouraging undesirable behavior (I'm not equating airline pilots to 8 month olds, although when the hotel van isn't on time the comparison is tempting). The work rule mentioned above was in place at the regional where I flew before UAL and it made me sad to watch captains fly at 2/3 cruise speed just to get the extra tenth or two (unless it's the go home leg, than it's max blast...so much for customer empathy). It strikes me that these work rules serve to reward undesirable, ineffecient behavior.
Here's the root of my thought: either A) pilots truly are in a position to direct the chorus (fuel, catering, flight attendants, maintenance, appropriate altitudes for wind, etc) and should be appropriately rewarded for good performance in the things they claim to be the final authority over, or B) we don't have that much control, shouldn't be held accountable, and (gasp) shouldn't be paid as much. I see option A in line operations and believe I deserve the resulting pay (not the pay da Massa hands down, but the pay my union negotiates, thank you).
Should I have gone to Southwest because the mentality I speak of just won't ever come to fruition at UAL in the foreseeable future?
W8N