Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UK and EU ETS fee's announced, let the games begin

  • Thread starter Thread starter G4G5
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 9

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Really waka? come on man:


Obama appears pretty good at taking over banks and car companies, feels pretty good about dolling out TARP to cronie states.



Obama is qouted saying "he doesn't think those fat cats deserve anything" and in fact "shall have their pay restricted".

Seems like a socialist to me.

I'm not a big Obama fan but don't be a hypocrite. Check out the Emergency Economic Stabilzation act of 2008 and see who signed that into law. Republicans are really no different than the Democrats. They aren't for bailouts unless it is their company or state that needs it.

Here I'll get you a link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008

Also, check out how many bailouts ocured in 2008... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._Savings_and_Loan_Crisis_.E2.80.93_1989
 
Really waka? come on man:


Obama appears pretty good at taking over banks and car companies, feels pretty good about dolling out TARP to cronie states.



Obama is qouted saying "he doesn't think those fat cats deserve anything" and in fact "shall have their pay restricted".

Seems like a socialist to me.

If we want to get really esoteric, I guess there's some wiggle room for the definition depending on where one considers himself to be on the political spectrum.

Obama didn't take over banks and the auto manufacturers against their will. Remember, they begged the gov't for assistance. Should they have received the proverbial blank check and carte blanche? Until they repay the money (some have), the gov't should own a controlling stake. That's not socialism, it's lending.

Now, if you think the gov't should have just let the banks/auto manufacturers fail and let Darwinism run its course, that's another debate.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom