inflightboi175
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Posts
- 151
This is a tough time for U.S. regional airlines.The major carriers, upon whom regionals rely for business, have slashed domestic capacity--first to cope with last year's skyrocketing fuel prices, and then with the long and deep recession.The legacy airlines they once thought of as partners also have become more like clients in a buyer-vendor relationship. Delta Air Lines in particular is looking for wiggle room in long-term contracts to let it cut regional services or payments to the carriers, two of which--Mesa Air Group and SkyWest--are in court with Delta over contract disputes. SkyWest is also wrangling with Delta out of court on contract-based calculations for resetting of rates.From August 2008 to February 2009, U.S. regional airlines reduced their workforce by more than 6%, about 4,000 employees. Shares in Mesa Air Group, one of the largest players, are trading for pennies--literally--on the stock market and the company is in danger of being delisted. Republic Airways Holdings has felt compelled to invest in carriers to keep them from going out of business or into bankruptcy, so it can maintain or add them as clients for its jets.
The demand for 50-seat aircraft has dropped precipitously, and the future of fuel costs makes it unlikely that it will recover significantly. The fall-off in business traffic has lowered, or even eliminated, the profitability of some regional jets. And the regionals are being pressured to cut costs at a time when shrinking fleets make unit-cost reductions especially challenging.
With the use of predominantly long-term, fixed-fee contracts, the business model adopted by the regional carriers proved itself very resilient in the past 10 years, even when major carriers ran into financial trouble, says Jonathan Ornstein, Mesa Air Group's chairman and CEO. But he concedes that "the Achilles' heel of the business model was that it relied upon contracts with major carriers for their financial health, and [those contracts] had a term associated with them."So where do U.S. regional airlines go from here? Do they revamp their business models, stay on the same course until the economy improves or pick a middle ground? For now, they seem to be opting for the middle ground: Maintaining a belief in the fundamentals of their model while recognizing their business will never be quite the same.Some changes are already taking place.
Regional carriers are moving away from jets with 50 or fewer seats. Republic Airways Holdings is leading the way--as of the end of March, aircraft of 70 seats or more accounted for 130 of its 221 aircraft. At the same time last year, Republic had 118 aircraft with 36-50 seats and 108 with 70 or more.And regionals are operating in some bigger markets now, not just small-city-to-big-hub feeder routes. The number of flights linking large hub airports has increased in total and as a percentage of all regional airline operations, according to the Jacobs Consultancy. Global airlines have shifted more of their own aircraft to international routes with no low-cost-carrier competition and "outsourced" more domestic flying to the regionals. Industry analyst Michael Boyd does not even like to call them "regionals" anymore--or even "airlines."They're not in the airline business; they're in the leasing business," Boyd says. "It's a leasing model. [And] the need of the major carriers to lease in certain types of airplanes will evolve." It is not likely that many, if any, regional carriers would go along with that terminology. But they do acknowledge that the business is changing.
This need to *****retool and rethink is a far cry from just a few years ago, when demand for regional services was booming. In the midst of a recession and in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and their added impact on traffic, the major carriers turned to regionals to fill their domestic flights, and they grew rapidly.In 2000-05, by the FAA's count, the U.S. regional airline fleet grew nearly 25%, to 2,830 from 2,274 aircraft."There was a time when the majors were fighting over regional jet capacity," Ornstein recalls.But 2005 was the peak, and the bottom dropped out last year. In April, according to the Regional Airline Assn. (RAA), the U.S. regional fleet stood at 2,324 aircraft--almost back to where it was at the beginning of the decade.Average aircraft size has increased, but after average annual growth in traffic topping 15% in 2000-07, traffic fell slightly in 2008, although that understates the drop. In the fourth quarter of last year, according to RAA numbers, traffic declined 8.2% year-over-year on a 9% cut in capacity.Nonetheless, regional airlines are still big service providers. Regional jets accounted for 15% of domestic capacity in 2008 and 36% of domestic flights, according to Jacobs Consultancy figures. The RAA says regional airlines serve 631 U.S. airports, and provide the only scheduled service at 486 of them.But the shrinking pie for regional services--and the drop in demand for 50-seat aircraft in particular--has sharpened competition and left regionals more vulnerable to major airline demands.Some of this will play out years from now, as existing long-term contracts between major and regional airlines expire. Still, regional carriers also have to make changes now.
The demand for 50-seat aircraft has dropped precipitously, and the future of fuel costs makes it unlikely that it will recover significantly. The fall-off in business traffic has lowered, or even eliminated, the profitability of some regional jets. And the regionals are being pressured to cut costs at a time when shrinking fleets make unit-cost reductions especially challenging.
With the use of predominantly long-term, fixed-fee contracts, the business model adopted by the regional carriers proved itself very resilient in the past 10 years, even when major carriers ran into financial trouble, says Jonathan Ornstein, Mesa Air Group's chairman and CEO. But he concedes that "the Achilles' heel of the business model was that it relied upon contracts with major carriers for their financial health, and [those contracts] had a term associated with them."So where do U.S. regional airlines go from here? Do they revamp their business models, stay on the same course until the economy improves or pick a middle ground? For now, they seem to be opting for the middle ground: Maintaining a belief in the fundamentals of their model while recognizing their business will never be quite the same.Some changes are already taking place.
Regional carriers are moving away from jets with 50 or fewer seats. Republic Airways Holdings is leading the way--as of the end of March, aircraft of 70 seats or more accounted for 130 of its 221 aircraft. At the same time last year, Republic had 118 aircraft with 36-50 seats and 108 with 70 or more.And regionals are operating in some bigger markets now, not just small-city-to-big-hub feeder routes. The number of flights linking large hub airports has increased in total and as a percentage of all regional airline operations, according to the Jacobs Consultancy. Global airlines have shifted more of their own aircraft to international routes with no low-cost-carrier competition and "outsourced" more domestic flying to the regionals. Industry analyst Michael Boyd does not even like to call them "regionals" anymore--or even "airlines."They're not in the airline business; they're in the leasing business," Boyd says. "It's a leasing model. [And] the need of the major carriers to lease in certain types of airplanes will evolve." It is not likely that many, if any, regional carriers would go along with that terminology. But they do acknowledge that the business is changing.
This need to *****retool and rethink is a far cry from just a few years ago, when demand for regional services was booming. In the midst of a recession and in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and their added impact on traffic, the major carriers turned to regionals to fill their domestic flights, and they grew rapidly.In 2000-05, by the FAA's count, the U.S. regional airline fleet grew nearly 25%, to 2,830 from 2,274 aircraft."There was a time when the majors were fighting over regional jet capacity," Ornstein recalls.But 2005 was the peak, and the bottom dropped out last year. In April, according to the Regional Airline Assn. (RAA), the U.S. regional fleet stood at 2,324 aircraft--almost back to where it was at the beginning of the decade.Average aircraft size has increased, but after average annual growth in traffic topping 15% in 2000-07, traffic fell slightly in 2008, although that understates the drop. In the fourth quarter of last year, according to RAA numbers, traffic declined 8.2% year-over-year on a 9% cut in capacity.Nonetheless, regional airlines are still big service providers. Regional jets accounted for 15% of domestic capacity in 2008 and 36% of domestic flights, according to Jacobs Consultancy figures. The RAA says regional airlines serve 631 U.S. airports, and provide the only scheduled service at 486 of them.But the shrinking pie for regional services--and the drop in demand for 50-seat aircraft in particular--has sharpened competition and left regionals more vulnerable to major airline demands.Some of this will play out years from now, as existing long-term contracts between major and regional airlines expire. Still, regional carriers also have to make changes now.