Finally an intelligent response..
I appreciate your reply Jason Kagan. My response to your question is this:
It is irrelevant to another Pilot Group what the reason for a particular Pilot Groups scope clause in their CBA. The fact is... it exists for their benefit and to turn a blind eye to that fact changes nothing.
With that said..... my main point to the Pilots at Trans States is this:
Stop your big bad toughguy talk and antics towards other Pilots that are doing the SAME thing that your are doing and are willing to do. It happens and you are NO different and you can only imagine if the all the Pilot groups started acting personally towards you like you have been acting.
Jason Kagan said:Angus,
I can only answer your questions with a question. What do the AA pilots gain or hope to gain from having scope language that prohibits code share partners from flying 70 seat aircraft, even if it is flown for a different code share? I don't understand the logic in that language.
Please explain.
I appreciate your reply Jason Kagan. My response to your question is this:
It is irrelevant to another Pilot Group what the reason for a particular Pilot Groups scope clause in their CBA. The fact is... it exists for their benefit and to turn a blind eye to that fact changes nothing.
With that said..... my main point to the Pilots at Trans States is this:
Stop your big bad toughguy talk and antics towards other Pilots that are doing the SAME thing that your are doing and are willing to do. It happens and you are NO different and you can only imagine if the all the Pilot groups started acting personally towards you like you have been acting.