Foxcow
screwed
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Posts
- 343
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd put my greenbacks on the F-104...Airpiraterob said:.
what about the running start climb then?
f-15 or f-14.....or even...f-104.
what would you take for the running start? form a standing start the f-15 no question.....but what if both were mach 1 to begin with down low, and then went for the climb....who would win?
Airpiraterob said:it's a shame. you see that wide expansive area between the wings? the top of the engine tunnels? well that my-friends is what makes that plane the best climbing plane over ANY of our current stock of planes. its got less power to weight...but pull it up to over 70 deg. climb.....itll outclimb anything else we got simply cause of the lifting surfaces....theyre more effective. the F-16 can go supersonic vertically......and it still cant out do the F-14....in that area.....so do your high speed pass....go vert. and nothing will catch you.
the superhornet?....anyone know if it can fire that big AIM-54? i guess thats the replacement now...
If the Air Force or Navy determines that they need a longer range missile, they'll add ramjet propulsion to an AMRAAM, or license build the European Meteor missile (already has a ramjet).RJP said:While it's obvious that you're not an aeronautical engineer, you may want to study up on the issue (as others have mentioned here) of 'thrust-to-weight ratio'. That's what makes flying things continue to go up when the items that provide lift no longer are able to do so.
The cat's had it's day. Time to go to Tucson and gather dust. And you've probably seen the end of the AIM-54 as well. AAMRAAM is much better while lacking some of the full-range of the -54.
Jedi_Cheese said:I think there would be a (small) market for used F-14's... if the US goverment will sell them (which is doubtful).